Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Magnitude 5.8 - VIRGINIA

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭Frynge


    Now 6.0 felt as far away as martha's vineyard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Gandhi


    Sure felt it here in Philly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Strongest earthquakes recorded in Virginia since 1897 it seems.

    Any reports of damage? 6km isnt very deep shallow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭Frynge


    seems to be damage/disruption to cell phone towers and satelite communication


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Pangea




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭Frynge


    Pangea wrote: »

    was it a different quake or an after shock of the virginina one.

    now revised to 5.9

    no reports of damage so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Frynge wrote: »
    was it a different quake or an after shock of the virginina one.

    now revised to 5.9

    no reports of damage so far.

    Not sure, it just happened 20 mins ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Upgraded to 5.9, strongest earthquake ever recorded in Virginia.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 31,117 ✭✭✭✭snubbleste


    Has FoxNews outlined which terrorist organisation is responsible? :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Local ABC news coverage http://www.wjla.com/live/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Gandhi


    snubbleste wrote: »
    Has FoxNews outlined which terrorist organisation is responsible? :cool:

    The Onion tweeted that a 500 ft Bin Laden was what we were feeling. They were pretty quick off the mark with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭muff03


    Girlfriend just text from Yonkers a few minutes ago after an aftershock


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭DjFlin


    It's actually just the Dollar collapsing...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭philstar


    are earthquakes weather related?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,333 ✭✭✭sunbabe08


    well we have volcano threads in here, might as well have earthquakes too.


    i have a brother in harrisonburg Virginia. trying to contact him:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    philstar wrote: »
    are earthquakes weather related?

    No.

    But this earthquake has happened less than a day after a 5.3 in Colorado.

    Largest earthquake in Colorado for over a century then hours later the largest earthquake ever recorded in Virginia. I guess there could be some connection there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Gandhi


    I always thought earthquakes were considered weather. Is weather atmospheric only?

    Anyway, cool graph showing travel times of the earthquake:

    http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_c0005ild_t.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭gbee


    Gandhi wrote: »
    I always thought earthquakes were considered weather. Is weather atmospheric only?]

    Volcanoes effect the weather, to a lesser extent earthquakes can too, they might cause a tsunami and flooding.

    I've no problems in having them in the weather forum ~


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,528 ✭✭✭✭dsmythy


    People less likely to pop into an "Earth sciences" forum than weather. Geography forum is a graveyard. Earthquake news here makes sense


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,921 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    philstar wrote: »
    are earthquakes weather related?
    And there's no mention on rte or anything of an earthquake in cavan, let alone such a massive one?

    What's going on? :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,333 ✭✭✭sunbabe08


    my brother's fine. did not give any details. hello, thats one of the reason i was looking for him, he's only a hour away from where the earthquake originated. the other was see if he was ok.


  • Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    philstar wrote: »
    are earthquakes weather related?


    wow, what an original question

    FFS:rolleyes:


  • Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    sunbabe08 wrote: »
    my brother's fine. did not give any details. hello, thats one of the reason i was looking for him, he's only a hour away from where the earthquake originated. the other was see if he was ok.

    Delighted for you that your brother is ok. Your nerves must have been shattered when you heard the initial report.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭gbee


    I did not see the turned over chair earlier ~ hope i'm not premature, but it seem like a storm in a teacup.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    Seems to be quite a lot of earthquakes recently in general.
    I wonder are we due for our once in 500 year mild shaking. It would certainly take care of the ghost estate problem!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭up for anything


    From BT:
    CHUCK BANKS on August 23, 2011, 7:07 PM
    I work in an 8-story building 45 miles from the epicenter of the VA quake. I was standing next to my desk talking to two guys. It started quite gentle for about 10 seconds. We looked around thinking someone was running past the desk. Suddenly, it got violent, shaking so hard that items on my desk bounced around, and the lights and cubicle walls swayed. The building made terrible cracking and poping sounds. One guy yelled “Under the desks!”, and we all followed within a second. The hard shaking lasted about 10-15 seconds, then it gradually eased off for maybe another 10-15 seconds. Everything was swaying so much that it’s hard to say exactly when the quake ended. Everything in the building seemed perfectly normal when it was over. However, all 7,000 of us decided that evacuation was a good idea after the sounds we heard and the possibility of aftershocks. Security inspected the parking garage, and we were released for the day. We all got out of the parking garage ASAP and went home.

    Cell phone lines were jammed for the next hour, but texting worked fine. That’s something everyone should remember in major events. A text only needs a fraction of a second of contact to get through, and your phone will try until it succeeds.

    There is minor, but widespread damage. The National Cathedral in DC had three of the four pinacles at the top of the spires fall off. There are pieces of them all over the roof and ground. They are stone, and several feet high.

    I just got a call that we are to return to work tomorrow, so I guess the building inspection was okay. I lived in CA for four years, and this was much stronger than anything I felt there.

    A lot of people are saying that is was much stronger than anything experienced on the West coast. Also there seems to be lots of finger crossing that it is the main earthquake and not a foreshock.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Solair


    From BT:



    A lot of people are saying that is was much stronger than anything experienced on the West coast. Also there seems to be lots of finger crossing that it is the main earthquake and not a foreshock.

    Could that be because most West Coast structures are relatively earthquake proof?
    East Coast buildings are far more like ours, they'd make a hell of a noise and probably crack of even slightly shaken. The pavements / sidewalks and roads would also probably transmit shockwaves too. West Coast pavements have to cope with regular tremors.

    I suspect the phone networks just overloaded as everyone suddenly rang everyone else. Cell sites can only host so many calls simultaneously.
    It didn't seem to be physical damage as it came back online very quickly afterwards.
    We've all experienced this on New Years eve.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭up for anything


    Solair wrote: »
    Could that be because most West Coast structures are relatively earthquake proof?
    East Coast buildings are far more like ours, they'd make a hell of a noise and probably crack of even slightly shaken. The pavements / sidewalks and roads would also probably transmit shockwaves too. West Coast pavements have to cope with regular tremors.

    I suspect the phone networks just overloaded as everyone suddenly rang everyone else. Cell sites can only host so many calls simultaneously.
    It didn't seem to be physical damage as it came back online very quickly afterwards.
    We've all experienced this on New Years eve.

    I came across a load of links yesterday explaining this but can't seem to find any now. I'll post some later when I track them down. It is due to the different geology of the West and East coasts and where they situated on plates and plate boundaries as far as I can remember.

    Edited.

    Found one.

    http://www.geol.vt.edu/outreach/vtso/cvsz.html
    EARTHQUAKES IN THE CENTRAL VIRGINIA SEISMIC ZONE
    Since at least 1774, people in central Virginia have felt small earthquakes and suffered damage from infrequent larger ones. The largest damaging earthquake (magnitude 4.8) in the seismic zone occurred in 1875. Smaller earthquakes that cause little or no damage are felt each year or two.

    Earthquakes in the central and eastern U.S., although less frequent than in the western U.S., are typically felt over a much broader region. East of the Rockies, an earthquake can be felt over an area as much as ten times larger than a similar magnitude earthquake on the west coast. A magnitude 4.0 eastern U.S. earthquake typically can be felt at many places as far as 100 km (60 mi) from where it occurred, and it infrequently causes damage near its source. A magnitude 5.5 eastern U.S. earthquake usually can be felt as far as 500 km (300 mi) from where it occurred, and sometimes causes damage as far away as 40 km (25 mi).

    FAULTS
    Earthquakes everywhere occur on faults within bedrock, usually miles deep. Most bedrock beneath central Virginia was assembled as continents collided to form a supercontinent about 500-300 million years ago, raising the Appalachian Mountains. Most of the rest of the bedrock formed when the supercontinent rifted apart about 200 million years ago to form what are now the northeastern U.S., the Atlantic Ocean, and Europe.

    At well-studied plate boundaries like the San Andreas fault system in California, often scientists can determine the name of the specific fault that is responsible for an earthquake. In contrast, east of the Rocky Mountains this is rarely the case. The Central Virginia seismic zone is far from the nearest plate boundaries, which are in the center of the Atlantic Ocean and in the Caribbean Sea. The seismic zone is laced with known faults but numerous smaller or deeply buried faults remain undetected. Even the known faults are poorly located at earthquake depths. Accordingly, few, if any, earthquakes in the seismic zone can be linked to named faults. It is difficult to determine if a known fault is still active and could slip and cause an earthquake. As in most other areas east of the Rockies, the best guide to earthquake hazards in the seismic zone is the earthquakes themselves.

    Source: NEIC/USGS


    VTSO Home Page


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    Jeez I haven't been on this forum in a while and what do I read but of earthquakes in south Cavan:eek:


  • Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    4.8 in California earlier, with lots of after shocks.

    EQ-20110827-208729-US
    Magnitude: 4.8
    Mercalli scale: 5
    Date-Time [UTC]: 27 August, 2011 at 07:18:21 UTC
    Local Date/Time: Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 07:18 in the moorning at epicenter
    Location: 36� 35.052, 121� 10.848
    Depth: 7.60 km (4.72 miles)
    Region: North America


  • Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    they have brought it down to 4.6. heres a list of the aftershocks from USGS

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/quakes_all.php


Advertisement