Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BHP vs HP (Agricultural)

  • 22-08-2011 11:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭


    Anyone explain the difference to me.

    Most Irish cars have about 100bhp or so.

    Most Irish tractors are said to have 100 horse power.

    After having a look on the net I actually can find much about it. Is this some sort of metric v imperial measurement system or something ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭h3000


    I think it's more to do with where the power is measured than different units of measure. Most of the pulling power of tractors comes from their gearing. That are geared at much lower ratios than cars would be.

    I'm not 100% on the specifics and too tired to look them up ;):)

    0118 999 881 999 119 725 3



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭Neilw


    Torque, it's for tractors and trucks.......and vw tdi's:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Neilw wrote: »
    Torque, it's for tractors and trucks.......and vw tdi's:D

    I heard that NASA are planning to spin up the Moon with a 1.9 TDI. VAG have assured NASA that it won't need a remap.

    Terrible joke I know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,100 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Tractors may have similar HP to cars, but they have much more torque, so this combined with lower gearing gives them their massive pulling power in comparison to a car.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭pajo1981


    There is no difference. The peak power output of both a road car and a tractor is about 100BHP+


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    pajo1981 wrote: »
    There is no difference. The peak power output of both a road car and a tractor is about 100BHP+

    OK.

    Torque x RPM = Horse Power

    If this is the case, if a car and a tractor had the same power, if the tractor revved at half the speed of the car engine, it would have double the torque.

    What sort of size engines do tractors have and what sort of torque. From memory, they rev at, at least 2,000 RPM which isn't far off a diesel car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭Plug


    OSI wrote: »
    Aren't BHP and HP measured at different points along the drive train?

    I'm not sure it of it all, but I though one was measured at the flywheel, and the other at the wheels or something along those lines...
    BHP is measured at the flywheel with no load. No alternator, ac, ps, nothing. Its the true power output from an engine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭pajo1981


    OK.

    Torque x RPM = Horse Power

    If this is the case, if a car and a tractor had the same power, if the tractor revved at half the speed of the car engine, it would have double the torque.

    Correct, if the tractor puts out peak power at half the rev rate, then at peak power the torque output will be double.

    Don't forget though that this only one point on the rev range.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭Nonoperational


    Confab wrote: »
    I heard that NASA are planning to spin up the Moon with a 1.9 TDI. VAG have assured NASA that it won't need a remap.

    Terrible joke I know.

    The small silver bit at the end of your post should really be in huge bold font at the start :-)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,044 ✭✭✭Wossack


    OK.

    Torque x RPM = Horse Power

    If this is the case, if a car and a tractor had the same power, if the tractor revved at half the speed of the car engine, it would have double the torque.

    What sort of size engines do tractors have and what sort of torque. From memory, they rev at, at least 2,000 RPM which isn't far off a diesel car.

    dont forget the magic number! :)

    HP = torque x RPM / 5252

    under 5252 rpm, torque figures are always higher then hp, above 5252 rpm, hp is always higher. At 5252 rpm, torque and hp are exactly the same


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭conneem-TT


    Confab wrote: »
    I heard that NASA are planning to spin up the Moon with a 1.9 TDI. VAG have assured NASA that it won't need a remap.

    Terrible joke I know.

    Well known fact, they have been testing for years ;)

    space_shuttle_tdi.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26 rocky112


    Anyone explain the difference to me.

    Most Irish cars have about 100bhp or so.

    Most Irish tractors are said to have 100 horse power.

    After having a look on the net I actually can find much about it. Is this some sort of metric v imperial measurement system or something ?

    Hi,

    BHP is Break Horse Power and it is used to measure amount of horsepower for machines like dynamo-meter.
    HP is Horsepower is a mathematical definition of power.

    When it comes to vehicle like car then BHP is corrector of accessories and HP is for net figure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭Plug


    Heres a fact about the space shuttle, It pushes out about 20 million horsepower:eek:


    Not quite as powerful as a Tee Dee Aye though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭Pique


    Little known fact about BHP.
    It stands for Brake Horsepower.

    Also, the middle pedal is for the brakes.
    The lever behind the gearstick in most cars is called the handbrake.

    Please forward this information onto those who, despite driving for years, are still unaware of the difference between 'to brake' and 'to break'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭Plug


    Pique wrote: »
    Little known fact about BHP.
    It stands for Brake Horsepower.

    Also, the middle pedal is for the brakes.
    The lever behind the gearstick in most cars is called the handbrake.

    Please forward this information onto those who, despite driving for years, are still unaware of the difference between 'to brake' and 'to break'.
    have-a-break-have-a-kit-kat-small.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭Pique


    Plug wrote: »
    have-a-break-have-a-kit-kat-small.jpg

    om nom nom :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭dharn


    average 100 bhp tractor would be about 4 litres they must be designed for more torque output as the average tractor engine is much bigger than 3-4 litre car engine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭Plug


    dharn wrote: »
    average 100 bhp tractor would be about 4 litres they must be designed for more torque output as the average tractor engine is much bigger than 3-4 litre car engine
    They would have a long stroke to give high torque output. Also a long stroke gives it the low RPM.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Solnskaya


    Anyone explain the difference to me.

    Most Irish cars have about 100bhp or so.

    Most Irish tractors are said to have 100 horse power.

    After having a look on the net I actually can find much about it. Is this some sort of metric v imperial measurement system or something ?
    hitch your car to a tractor using a big, meaty chain, then have a tug of war between them. Nothing explains torque like a good auld visual demonstration. Unless you have a Daewoo Musso. (see youtube, daewoo musso v tractor, I'm way too thick to post a link, but it's a good watch. Well, I liked it anyway)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,971 ✭✭✭teednab-el


    My understanding is of the terms. HP in a tractor is pulling power. BHP in cars is power output of the drive shaft on an engine, completely different concepts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    OK.

    Torque x RPM = Horse Power

    That's not really correct.
    To be exact:

    Torque * Angular velocity = Power

    SI units for above are:

    Torque - Newton * Metre
    Angular velocity - Radian / second
    Power - Watt

    So in other words:

    1Newton * 1Metre * 1Radian / 1second = 1Watt

    To have it in more understandable format, we have to convert Angular velocity from Rad/s to RPM, and Watts to BHP - we can leave Torque at N*m as this is most commonly used unit.

    1 RPM = 2π/60 Rad/s
    1 BHP = 745.7 Watt

    So:

    1 Rad/s = 60/2π RPM = approx. 9.55 RPM
    1 Watt = 0.001341 BHP


    So now we have:

    (Torque of 1 N*m) * (9.55 RPM) will produce = (0.001341 BHP).

    Then:
    1 N*m * 1 RPM = 0.000140419 BHP

    Calculate:
    1/0.000140419 = 7121

    In the end:

    Torque (N*m) * Rev (RPM) / 7121 = Power (BHP)

    That's the correct formula (approxime as calulus was only approx).

    Assuming I made all calculations right ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Solnskaya wrote: »
    hitch your car to a tractor using a big, meaty chain, then have a tug of war between them. Nothing explains torque like a good auld visual demonstration. Unless you have a Daewoo Musso. (see youtube, daewoo musso v tractor, I'm way too thick to post a link, but it's a good watch. Well, I liked it anyway)

    Excluding the additional traction that a tractor has due to being heavier and having larger tyres, surely a car of the same horsepower as a tractor could pull a trailer equally as well as a car if you put a special gearbox in the car to gear down the RPM in order to increase torque to the same level as the tractor ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Solnskaya


    CiniO wrote: »
    That's not really correct.
    To be exact:

    Torque * Angular velocity = Power

    SI units for above are:

    Torque - Newton * Metre
    Angular velocity - Radian / second
    Power - Watt

    So in other words:

    1Newton * 1Metre * 1Radian / 1second = 1Watt

    To have it in more understandable format, we have to convert Angular velocity from Rad/s to RPM, and Watts to BHP - we can leave Torque at N*m as this is most commonly used unit.

    1 RPM = 2π/60 Rad/s
    1 BHP = 745.7 Watt

    So:

    1 Rad/s = 60/2π RPM = approx. 9.55 RPM
    1 Watt = 0.001341 BHP


    So now we have:

    (Torque of 1 N*m) * (9.55 RPM) will produce = (0.001341 BHP).

    Then:
    1 N*m * 1 RPM = 0.000140419 BHP

    Calculate:
    1/0.000140419 = 7121

    In the end:

    Torque (N*m) * Rev (RPM) / 7121 = Power (BHP)

    That's the correct formula (approxime as calulus was only approx).

    Assuming I made all calculations right ;)
    And I thought Einstein was dead. My head hurts mum.Make the bad man stop.


  • Subscribers Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭conzy


    Excluding the additional traction that a tractor has due to being heavier and having larger tyres, surely a car of the same horsepower as a tractor could pull a trailer equally as well as a car if you put a special gearbox in the car to gear down the RPM in order to increase torque to the same level as the tractor ?

    Pretty much, just like if you put a tractor engine in a car and had a gearbox with longer gears it would accelerate at the same rate as a car with the same horsepower, obviously ignoring weight differences and the time taken to change
    gear etc..

    Gearing makes the torque generated at the flywheel irrelevant, a 300bhp car with 350Nm of torque will accelerate at the same rate as a 300bhp car with 150Nm of torque OR 900Nm of torque.. The are obviously geared very differently and are very different driving experiences


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    conzymaher wrote: »
    Pretty much, just like if you put a tractor engine in a car and had a gearbox with longer gears it would accelerate at the same rate as a car with the same horsepower, obviously ignoring weight differences and the time taken to change
    gear etc..

    Gearing makes the torque generated at the flywheel irrelevant, a 300bhp car with 350Nm of torque will accelerate at the same rate as a 300bhp car with 150Nm of torque OR 900Nm of torque.. The are obviously geared very differently and are very different driving experiences

    Why then are tractor engines so large compared to car engines if they are putting out a similar power output ?

    4L capacity has been quoted above for a mere 100bhp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 567 ✭✭✭puzzle factory


    Solnskaya wrote: »
    hitch your car to a tractor using a big, meaty chain, then have a tug of war between them. Nothing explains torque like a good auld visual demonstration. Unless you have a Daewoo Musso. (see youtube, daewoo musso v tractor, I'm way too thick to post a link, but it's a good watch. Well, I liked it anyway)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzxxok-H08E


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭Fishtits


    Cinio is dead right in his post.

    Unfortunately not everyone has a degree in engineering so here's a simpler explanation:

    Torque is a threat - here is what I think I can do - measured.

    Power is a witness - here is what actually happened - calculated.

    Power tells what torque did over a given time.

    You can have a huge torque and not move - ie a guy pulling on a spanner.

    Power incorporates the "work" torque has done once it moves a distance.

    To put it to bed, power = acceleration.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,094 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager


    In the good old days, wasn't there some rating system whereby a HP was 125cc? So, a one-litre car was classed as 8 HP, etc. I think this was for motor tax purposes.

    Not your ornery onager



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Esel wrote: »
    In the good old days, wasn't there some rating system whereby a HP was 125cc? So, a one-litre car was classed as 8 HP, etc. I think this was for motor tax purposes.

    Weird that. Cause a lot of farmers will tell you that most cars have around 10 HP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Fishtits wrote: »
    Cinio is dead right in his post.

    Unfortunately not everyone has a degree in engineering so here's a simpler explanation:

    Torque is a threat - here is what I think I can do - measured.

    Power is a witness - here is what actually happened - calculated.

    Power tells what torque did over a given time.

    You can have a huge torque and not move - ie a guy pulling on a spanner.

    Power incorporates the "work" torque has done once it moves a distance.

    To put it to bed, power = acceleration.


    I always think that the link between torque and power seems to be the level effect.

    You can put the same force on the end of two levers (akin to torque), but you'll lift more using a longer lever (akin to lower RPM), but you'll do it slower.

    Hence, power governs the overall situation. The split between torque and RPM (or lenght of lever for instance) is used for a given situation. Hence a gearbox.


Advertisement