Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How to integrate sin(3x^2)?

  • 19-08-2011 5:52pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭


    The full question is 2xsin(3x^2). I've been trying to do it with by parts but I'm not sure how to integrate Sin(3x^2). When I put it into an online integrator i get an answer involving square roots and pi's, but when I put the full question straight into the integrator i get -(1/3)cos(3x^2) which makes me think you some how differentiate the (3x^2) and divide the 2x by it. I can get to this by using by parts, ie. the uv equals this but i dunno how to get rid of the vdu part.

    Can anyone help me shed some light on this?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    Watch this for a bit of intuition:



    But it doesn't show everything so this after:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭shizz


    Watch this for a bit of intuition:



    But it doesn't show everything so this after:


    Thanks man. Ill watch them later can't now. Much appreciated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭shizz


    ah think it just occurred o me what to do. I though in these sort of situations, Ie function of x by a function of x, is by parts all the time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    This problem is a "u du substitution" (or "u substitution") problem.
    Usually people would see if a u-substitution would work on a problem
    before considering integration by parts but even then there's no general
    rule.

    If I integrate ∫2x³dx normally I'll get ½x⁴ + C. Well if I break ∫2x³dx up
    into ∫2x(x²)dx I can use the u-substitution method. By setting u = x² I
    can differentiate this to get du/dx = 2x, or du = 2xdx. Now we see that
    ∫2x(x²)dx = ∫udu, which is easy to integrate: ∫udu = ½u² + C = ½x⁴ + C.
    Notice what 2x(x²) looks like, it looks something like the chain rule, i.e.
    2x(x²) = 2x(x)², you know - something inside brackets raised to a power
    & something outside it as well. Basically a u-substitution is like a reversal
    of the chain rule. Try to spot the similarities between this example & your
    own one & give the videos a shot when you can.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,081 ✭✭✭LeixlipRed


    To summarise, if you have to integrate a function of the form g(f(x).f'(x) then you let u=f(x) and apply the method as showed by Sponsored Walk there. What does that mean in English? i.e. if there's some function and it's derivative (or a multiple of it) contained within the expression you can use the method. Note, the derivative must be multiplied by dx, it can't be in the denominator of a fraction for example.

    By parts works for products of functions. Which you can hopefully transform into something easier to integrate. Try using by parts here and I think you'll run into difficulty with integrating the sin(x^2) term.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,506 ✭✭✭shizz


    Thanks guys I know how to do it now. It's funny, if I was shown that question before learning by parts, I would have been able to do it. Just after doing by parts I have it in my head that a function by a function is always by parts. Obviously this isn't the case. Thanks for your help.


Advertisement