Do we need a World War?

SillyMcCarthy

With the current global economies in meltdown
do we need a World War to eliminate large
portions of populations globally?

It would cause global destruction but
on the other hand it would create
employment in a lot of areas!

Any potential Adolfs out there?

ronnie3585

Yes and no.

The Internet Explorer

You are silly McCarthy. Very very silly.

Where To

The next world war will be fought on the moon.



You heard it here first;)

LighterGuy

SillyMcCarthy wrote: »

With the current global economies in meltdown
do we need a World War to eliminate large
portions of populations globally?

It would cause global destruction but
on the other hand it would create
employment in a lot of areas!

Any potential Adolfs out there?

War is a horrible thing. And if there is a world war 3. Its going to worse than before.

Some how tho, when you talk about the possibilties of war, and positive things .. some how I cant help but feel you also mean a war thats fought well away from where you are, and a war you aint involed in :rolleyes:

looky loo

The germans and the french already won europe.

gcgirl

where do i go from here wrote: »

The next world war will be fought on the moon.



You heard it here first;)

Yep we will be fighting zombies on the moon

gcgirl

Come November I will be involved in World war 3, opps sorry MW3

rossie1977

where do i go from here wrote: »

The next world war will be fought on the moon.



You heard it here first;)

wouldn't be a world war then would be a moon war, or a satellite war

TheZohanS

World War 3 has already started.

Saila

TheZohan wrote: »

World War 3 has already started.

and the US wont win this one..

na na na na, na na na na waaaaave gooood bye!

wingsof daun

Why are you asking this on an internet forum? What sort of people do you want to answer you? Do you get satisfaction from the suffering of others? Do humans being burned alive and their bodies being torn by metal in some very sick way please you?

rockmongrel

Eh, no?

What the hell is wrong with you.

TheZohanS

Saila wrote: »

and the US wont win this one..

na na na na, na na na na waaaaave gooood bye!

They sure will, they'll freedify all of us.

Saila

TheZohan wrote: »

They sure will, they'll redefy all of us.

fyp

Biggins

TheZohan wrote: »

World War 3 has already started.

Aye, via the internet - it just hasn't got major publicity.

Pdfile

we don't need world wars, we have genocide to keep things in order... tho i do think NATO and America needs its come uppins.

ScumLord

War isn't really effective at slowing global population growth. We've already had two major ones and there's still 7 billion of us running around the place.

Where To

ScumLord wrote: »

War isn't really effective at slowing global population growth. We've already had two major ones and there's still 7 billion of us running around the place.

+1

What we really need is a good pestilence . . . . . . . .










*runs to dictionary to find meaning of 'pestilence'

smk89

I think WW3 should be more of a selective irradiation of certain individuals testicles.

Killer Pigeon

There's always full employment during great wars! It's sounds like a great idea OP. Finally, a solution to the country's unemployment - WAR!!

Killer Pigeon

gcgirl wrote: »

Come November I will be involved in World war 3, opps sorry MW3

The next world war won't be fought on land, sea, air or even space.
It'll be fought on a games console.

Elohim

Yes we need a World War but we need to be fighting against space aliens, not ourselves, at least according to Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman!!

http://theweek.com/article/index/218349/could-an-alien-invasion-really-save-the-us-economy

flas

id say its a lot closer than people think!

Conor108

Elohim wrote: »

Yes we need a World War but we need to be fighting against space aliens, not ourselves, at least according to Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman!!

http://theweek.com/article/index/218349/could-an-alien-invasion-really-save-the-us-economy

And Obama can do this speech!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUdB8gCMcXI

Killer Wench

With how frequent some of these threads turn to America bashing, I am really beginning to think that some of you are suffering from "inferiority" complexes. Hey! It worked for Napoleon.

J. Marston

If by World War, you mean French civil war, then yes.



Relax Frenchies, I'm joking.

Damn cheese-eating surrender monkeys...

cocoyan

It's not a good idea.Although the life is tough for the depress economy and large population,it is better than world war.

gsxr1

Are we not parasites on this beautiful planet.


Really.

What good have we ever done here.

Nothing.

We suck out the life of the world till its oilless barron end. And take 1000s of unknowing species with it.

The world would be a better place, and last a whole lot longer with less people.

DjFlin

Nothing wrong with a bitta war every now and again. For the craic like.

gsxr1 wrote: »

What good have we ever done here.

Oreos. Make up for everything we've done wrong...

gsxr1

DjFlin wrote: »

Nothing wrong with a bitta war every now and again. For the craic like.



Oreos. Make up for everything we've done wrong...

What good have we ever done here. Apart from Oreas.

Elohim

gsxr1 wrote: »

What good have we ever done here. Apart from Oreas.

What good have you ever done? Start there before extending it to 'we'.

Emiko

gsxr1 wrote: »

What good have we ever done here. Apart from Oreas.

They're nice biscuits, but hardly mankind's crowning achievement.

wolf moon

SillyMcCarthy wrote: »

With the current global economies in meltdown
do we need a World War to eliminate large
portions of populations globally?

Of course we do and we'll get it sooner than we expect.

To the economic meltdown I'd also add deterioration of the family, collapse of moral values, fkin celebrity culture and extreme poverty the majority of the population lives in.

Paris fukin Hilton gets millions for talking utter bollix and smiling to the public while the same day thousands of people die from starvation, lack of fresh water or easily cured diseases. All this crap has to collapse and it will.

--Kaiser--

gsxr1 wrote: »

Are we not parasites on this beautiful planet.


Really.

What good have we ever done here.

Nothing.

We suck out the life of the world till its oilless barron end. And take 1000s of unknowing species with it.

The world would be a better place, and last a whole lot longer with less people.

The pyramids at Giza
The temple at Angkor Wat
The artwork of Van Gogh
The artwork of Salvador Dali
The poetry of WB Yeats
The plays of Shakespeare
The complete works of Beethoven
The complete works of Led Zeppelin
The complete works of The Beatles
......
and so on, and so on

Wibbs

gsxr1 wrote: »

Are we not parasites on this beautiful planet.

No. With exception of hippies.

The world would be a better place, and last a whole lot longer with less people.

Without intelligent witness who would be left to know or care?

Saila wrote: »

and the US wont win this one..

na na na na, na na na na waaaaave gooood bye!

Actually if it went to a "proper" war they still would.

blaze1

You start one first, feel safe that the rest of the boards army will be riggggggggghhht behind you op

Lando Griffin

With the war on terror nearly won, and I am sure everyone agrees it has led to a more peaceful and safe world where the normal civilian can walk down the street without the fear of WMDs or IRDs ( except in the middle east and alot of Africa and a few spots in Asia and maybe Mexcio and a few areas of South America ) then I dont see the need for a World War.
All these people need is to be educated in Christian values, to respect each other and have good morals, especially where the lure of Oil is, because as it says in the scriptures somewhere, "eat with one hand so the other can share"

Rockery Woman

Ireland should start a war.

We should invade a country with a nicer climate and kick out the natives.

Who's with me????

mackg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj5Cvz4PnZw

ReacherCreature

SillyMcCarthy wrote: »

With the current global economies in meltdown
do we need a World War to eliminate large
portions of populations globally?

It would cause global destruction but
on the other hand it would create
employment in a lot of areas!

Any potential Adolfs out there?

Absolutely not. Humanity doesn't ever "need" a World War. It's an abhorrent "need".

Lando Griffin wrote: »

With the war on terror nearly won

Debatable, at least.

Herb Powell

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQCvzXic2RU