Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

50mm f1.8

  • 08-08-2011 12:44pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭


    I just got a new Canon 50mm sent new from Hong Kong for 60 pound. I have to say. Im very impressed. It takes effortless portraits of my son. Makes the kit lens seem useless .

    My question is. Is there a shorter lens by Canon for the same sort of money? I would like a 30mm or less as well as the 50.


Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,878 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Canon make a 28mm f1.8 & there's also the sigma 30mm f1.4.
    Both are roughly x4 the price if the nifty


    Edit - beaten to it by magic above!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    Anyone have the 28mm f1.8, seems like a good focal length for the aperture


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭goldseeker


    Had 50mm 1.8f superb lens for that blurred background, nice bokeh, sharp stopped down a bit. It becomes about 75mm on those cropped sensor cameras.
    Just one small note, if you go for that 28mm or 35mm you will lose that blurred background. I suggested to my friend 35mm 1.8f on cropped sensor body, so you do not have to walk back inside is room far to get all person in the frame. Becomes like 50mm not 75mm.But he was not able to get that bokeh and nice blurred background, that depends from f and focal length of the lens.
    Hope that is somehow useful to somebody.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,878 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    someone correct me if i am wrong - any focal length produces the same blurring at the same aperture; it's just that longer lenses 'pull in' the background more, thus 'magnifying' the extent of the out of focus areas.

    i can't imagine that there would be a massive difference between the 35mm and the 50mm.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    Just buy a full frame camera :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,713 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    someone correct me if i am wrong - any focal length produces the same blurring at the same aperture; it's just that longer lenses 'pull in' the background more, thus 'magnifying' the extent of the out of focus areas.

    i can't imagine that there would be a massive difference between the 35mm and the 50mm.

    heh. I was wondering when the bokeh wars would begin anew :-)

    Strictly speaking if you have the same framing in a 50mm lens on a FF body and a 35mm lens on a cropped (say 1.5) sensor, then you'll be approx 1.5 times the distance away, and if you're at the same aperture you'll have almost exactly the same DOF from both. However subjectively they'll look different because the longer lens will (as you seem to say above) compress the scene a little more.

    This is distinct from the example of shooting a 50mm and a (say) 20mm from the same point on sensors (or mediums) of similar size and cropping out the middle of the 20mm shot and blowing it up to same size as the 50mm shot, whereupon it will look identical.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭gsxr1


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Just buy a full frame camera :)

    LOL. Maybe after the recession.




    I have noticed a lot of FD 35mm lens going very cheap on flee bay. But Im guessing the auto focus will not work on my 1000d if I use one.


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    gsxr1 wrote: »
    I just got a new Canon 50mm sent new from Hong Kong for 60 pound. I have to say. Im very impressed. It takes effortless portraits of my son. Makes the kit lens seem useless .

    My question is. Is there a shorter lens by Canon for the same sort of money? I would like a 30mm or less as well as the 50.

    who did you order it from? no probs with customs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 274 ✭✭kfish2oo2


    I ordered mine from DigitalRev - there was what I thought was an issue with customs. They sent me a letter saying the revenue office were holding onto it and I needed to send them a paypal receipt; and that there might be a fee involved. So I got in touch with DigitalRev and they told me not to send anything and they'd sort it all out. 2 months later I just gave up, forwarded on the receipt that DigitalRev sent me to customs and voila, the next day the lens arrives with no extra fee.

    Lesson: if you've paid customs handling on your receipt, customs will not charge you.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭gsxr1


    glasso wrote: »
    who did you order it from? no probs with customs?

    No. it arrived 5 days after purchase. it was ticked as a gift as well

    from this seller
    http://myworld.ebay.com/worlducuk/?_trksid=p4340.l2559


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭aidanic


    Borderfox wrote: »
    Anyone have the 28mm f1.8, seems like a good focal length for the aperture

    I have the cheaper (f2.8) version of the 28mm. Lack of USM makes the auto-focus really noisey. Other than that I have no complaints. I tend to use it mainly for outdoors, and more recently for shooting some bits for sale on eBay. I use it both on a film EOS 30 and a 400D where it's more like 44mm.


Advertisement