Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is my new lens fooked?

  • 06-08-2011 3:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,790 ✭✭✭


    I bought a Canon 50mm f1.8 "nifty fifty". I'm mostly happy with it but I'm noticing some weird artifacts - when there are strong highlights in a photo (the candles in this example, I'm seeing bright greenish spots in the image, mirrored across from the centre point of the image (hope that makes sense).

    IMG_8388.jpg
    I took this at f1.8 1/50 with Canon 500D.

    Am I doing something wrong or is my lens faulty?


Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    It's probably just lens flare:
    http://www.flickr.com/groups/canonef50mm/discuss/72157601785735075/

    Are you using a filter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,790 ✭✭✭cornbb


    Ah, that's exactly what it is. Yes, I'm using a UV filter. I'll try reproducing the issue without it. Thank you so much :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Screw UV filters...

    ...off your lens, because they're unnecessary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,790 ✭✭✭cornbb


    I use them solely to protect my lenses. But perhaps they're not worth it, if they're producing such negative effects.

    BTW I did a quick test; that did the trick. I'm not seeing any flare without the filter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    Zillah wrote: »
    Screw UV filters...

    ...off your lens, because they're unnecessary.

    I have one on my lens, i always keep it on to protect the lens more than anything else. I'm not exactly an expert on these things though...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 760 ✭✭✭hbr


    cornbb wrote: »
    Yes, I'm using a UV filter.

    That's the most likely cause of flare and reflections. There isn't much point in
    putting a UV filter on a nifty fifty. The front element is quite deeply recessed
    so it doesn't need protection. You can get a high quality multicoated filter
    which will be less prone to reflections, but it will cost almost as much as
    the lens. If you want to protect the front element and also reduce flare and
    reflections, get a cheap hood on eBay.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 harryhyden


    Use filters


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    I've seen something similar where you take an overexposed shots of the moon and you get another ghost image of the moon appearing. It's caused by light bouncing off the sensor, hitting the rear element of the lens and bouncing back to the sensor again. What you're seeing could be this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,790 ✭✭✭cornbb


    kelly1 wrote: »
    I've seen something similar where you take an overexposed shots of the moon and you get another ghost image of the moon appearing. It's caused by light bouncing off the sensor, hitting the rear element of the lens and bouncing back to the sensor again. What you're seeing could be this.

    I've had that problem too. But in this case the problem was rectified by doing away with the filter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    cornbb wrote: »
    I've had that problem too. But in this case the problem was rectified by doing away with the filter.
    OK, sound like the light is bouncing off the front element and hitting the filter and bouncing back.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 65 ✭✭dmg1982


    A lens hood is better protection (IMO) for the front element of a lens and it serves to improve image quality rather than degrade it.

    Most digital cameras have a UV filter built-in over the sensor, so there's no need for them (IMO).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 65 ✭✭dmg1982


    kelly1 wrote: »
    OK, sound like the light is bouncing off the front element and hitting the filter and bouncing back.

    Pretty much... I believe the light reflects off the sensor during exposure too, made visible by having the filter in place.


Advertisement