Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The new way to break into a car - by texting!

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭Wetbench4


    Does this mean in a few years, when i start my car i'll get a load of google ads before i can use the radio??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    wrote:
    By setting up their own GSM network, they were able to snatch up password authentication messages being sent from server to car
    Messages being sent from server to car? I just had a look on the Subaru US website and I can find no mention of any such feature?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭langdang


    Anan1 wrote: »
    Messages being sent from server to car? I just had a look on the Subaru US website and I can find no mention of any such feature?
    Hmmm, part of traffic avoidance feature of the SatNav maybe? Can't see why your car would be talking to a network otherwise. Altho why would a satnav (even an integrated one) have access to your ECU or body control module?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,606 ✭✭✭Jumpy


    They also had a fellow on who hacked into his own insulin pump and could in theory kill himself by overdose if he so chose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭langdang


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    If the designers had any sense they would be on two seperate systems to avoid the above issue.
    Thinking about it (I have a boggo old school jap so these fancy dan gadgets are a mystery to me) I suppose the integrated satnav screens are also used to display non-satnav stuff (fuel left in tank, oil level, error mesages from ECU). So there is some amount of two-way communication I suppose. The designers just didn't expect anyone to exploit it obviously!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭Wetbench4


    Do they not mean the communication between your car and your key fob. Maybe it was a keyless car which probably means it would be constantly scanning for the fob. As far as i know these operate on a similar frequency to wifi and mobile phones. If you could fool the car into thinking your android phone was the fob, you'd have easy access.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    No accident that this effects a Japanese car maybe, they have almost no car theft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭Big Nasty


    Don't know if this is true at all but I heard a story about a guy locking his keys in his car and it was recommended to him that he ring his missus on his mobile and get her to hold the spare up to the phone and click it to unlock the car.

    Urban myth?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    I've heard that one but doubt it works as the phone would distort/change the frequency with its own frequency.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭pajo1981


    naive and cringeworthy


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    MCMLXXV wrote: »
    Don't know if this is true at all but I heard a story about a guy locking his keys in his car and it was recommended to him that he ring his missus on his mobile and get her to hold the spare up to the phone and click it to unlock the car.

    Urban myth?

    Completely, a phone transmits audible signals. That's from 20 Hz to 20KHz. A mobile phone transmits far less hence the quality of voice on a mobile is usually less than a landline. A car remote usually operates around 433 Mhz, so far beyond anything the microphone can pick up, or anything the ear piece can replicate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    Owen wrote: »
    Completely, a phone transmits audible signals. That's from 20 Hz to 20KHz. A mobile phone transmits far less hence the quality of voice on a mobile is usually less than a landline. A car remote usually operates around 433 Mhz, so far beyond anything the microphone can pick up, or anything the ear piece can replicate.


    I must memorise this post because the amount of clowns that think this is true is unbelieveable....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭langdang


    Wetbench - no, the info in the article does not suggest that the keyless entry RF system was used. Looks like it was GSM or WCDMA network based.
    Especially when you look at this article http://www.scmagazineus.com/black-hat-car-unlocked-started-via-war-texting/article/209037/

    As for the remote unlocking over the phone thing - as Owen said, any of the RF fobs won't work at all over the phone. The way old ultra sonic fobs might work over some phones* but to be honest that's also unlikely, as the processing and filtering that happens to maximise the calls on a network would filter out inaudible stuff (as per Owens frequencies mentioned above). You could hardly make out voice on some networks and phones, let alone ultrasonic signals!

    *Better chance on old analog networks, feck all chance on digital networks I'd say..


Advertisement