Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Chick tracts

  • 25-07-2011 8:44am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭


    Anyone here ever read them? Here's the link, if you haven't

    www.chick.com


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 296 ✭✭PatricaMcKay


    You know right that they are often widely inaccurate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭homer911


    Never heard of them before - they seem to take a lot of "poetic" license with the words they use.

    If find the concept weird. The use of a comic book style for the less well educated with some very serious commentary doesn't sit well together for me. The embellishment of Biblical facts with extra comments without distinguishing them from what appears in the Bible I would also be unhappy with - See this story as an example: http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0295/0295_01.asp

    Interesting mission, but I had to dig a bit to find it "...we publish gospel tracts to win Roman Catholics to salvation by faith."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    They really are pretty bigoted and awful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭homer911


    If you are looking for tracts - try this site: http://www.tractlist.com/

    (World Christian Tract Directory)

    (no mention of chick!)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    This one is particularly patronising.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,980 ✭✭✭wolfsbane


    homer911 wrote: »
    Never heard of them before - they seem to take a lot of "poetic" license with the words they use.

    If find the concept weird. The use of a comic book style for the less well educated with some very serious commentary doesn't sit well together for me. The embellishment of Biblical facts with extra comments without distinguishing them from what appears in the Bible I would also be unhappy with - See this story as an example: http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0295/0295_01.asp

    Interesting mission, but I had to dig a bit to find it "...we publish gospel tracts to win Roman Catholics to salvation by faith."
    A sad mixture of gospel and ignorance, with lots of gullibility thrown in. Gives Evangelicals a bad name.

    But the medium is powerful. Easily read and attractive, with pictures conveying complex emotions so much quicker and easier than words. I believe Chick picked it up from the communists in their outreach to barely literate peasants.

    ********************************************************************
    2 Timothy 2:15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,314 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    I spotted some of them yesterday on a Christian stand in Galway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    branie2 wrote: »
    I spotted some of them yesterday on a Christian stand in Galway

    Wow. Not seen them in 30 years. Thought they had gone the way of the dodo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 533 ✭✭✭Michael OBrien


    wolfsbane wrote: »
    Easily read and attractive, with pictures conveying complex emotions so much quicker and easier than words. I believe Chick picked it up from the communists in their outreach to barely literate peasants.
    That says something about the view he has of his intended audience. These are typically aimed at young earth creationists. "barely literate peasants" is pretty much accurate.


Advertisement