Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    Gale crater chosen for landing site.

    http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1107/22mslgale/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    I can understand why they chose that site as it is very deep and they intend to look for signs of former life. Although I would have thought that a crater nearer to the poles would be better than one on the equator. I am sure warmth doesn't matter now as it might have done when/if there actually was life.

    (Does that make sense?)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    Rubecula wrote: »
    I can understand why they chose that site as it is very deep and they intend to look for signs of former life. Although I would have thought that a crater nearer to the poles would be better than one on the equator. I am sure warmth doesn't matter now as it might have done when/if there actually was life.

    (Does that make sense?)
    I guess that the fact it is deep would have allowed for water in the past as a lake in warm conditions. This should hopefully allow for the possibility of life in the past, at least thats how I would see it:confused:


Advertisement