Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Parallels or VMware for Windows VM in OSX?

  • 20-07-2011 12:08AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 ✭✭✭


    What are people's opinions on these two?
    I expect there are more Parallels users and would like to hear what they think but would especially like to hear from anyone who has tried both. I foolishly installed the trial of Parallels just before I went on holidays and the two week trial was up by the time I tried to use it :o

    I have a W7 bootcamp partition on my iMac with Office on it but switching between the two is a pain. Supposedly, holding down the option key lets you choose OS whenever you start up but it seems only to work occasionally. I suspect it may be down to the bluetooth keyboard not pairing quickly enough but I really don't know.

    I got a copy of Office 2011 for Mac today but before I open it and use the licence I wonder would I be better off just sticking with my PC Office licence in a VM. Two licences for the same suite of software on one physical machine seems ridiculous, especially for somebody who used to take pride in the fact, years ago, that there wasn't a legit piece of software on my PC!

    FWIW, Windows is only really needed for Mrs.Milltown's work, using Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Sharepoint and Citrix.

    TIA.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    I've used both, I prefer Parallels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    Why not VirtualBox? It's open sourced and free


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    I have only used Parallels. I like the fact you can have it running invisible and all the windows apps launch like as if they are part of the Mac system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 ✭✭✭milltown


    Diarmuid wrote: »
    Why not VirtualBox? It's open sourced and free

    How user friendly is that?
    I have neither beard nor glasses and find that a lot of open source software "expects" a certain level of sacrifice/expertise.
    Years ago I would have whooped at the free bit but nowadays I'm too old and curmudgeonly to put up with command lines and software that doesn't work the way I want it to. Kind of why I switched to Mac this year I suppose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    I've been using Parallels for over a year now. Only issue is that it cannot use the firewire port, so no importing video (therefore no video editing) in Windows. Otherwise it's seamless.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    milltown wrote: »
    How user friendly is that?.
    Never had any problem getting to grips with it. Why not give it a whirl for 10 minutes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 ✭✭✭milltown


    I'm actually giving VMware a spin as we speak, and finding it pretty good.
    Nesf, what did you find better about Parallels?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    milltown wrote: »
    I'm actually giving VMware a spin as we speak, and finding it pretty good.
    Nesf, what did you find better about Parallels?

    I found it a bit less temperamental and more stable overall. Better thought out and more tuned for a Mac than VMWare's offering. It's a bit faster than VMWare, not that much but it's there. Better 3D performance and video editing ability though not sure why you'd do these in a virtual machine really.

    There's not much in it but Parallels at the moment edges it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Just one other thing - sometimes when toggling between Mac OSx and Windows, the Caps lock key becomes inverted in Windows. Can be a little bit annoying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Did a little test there with Ubuntu 11.04. Performance is far better on Parallels versus VirtualBox. It's a lot more straightforward to install with Parallels (only an issue if you're not that technically minded). VirtualBox was usable but there was far too much lag for my liking.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well naturally performance will be better with a paid product like vmWare (they are market leaders)

    I have had not problems with lag on VB with 2 windows open and ubuntu open and toggling between them on spaces. Only lag was with ubuntu flash playing as I didnt tweak it for days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,168 ✭✭✭Talisman


    Parallels Desktop has been a far better supported product than VMware Fusion in recent years.

    Fusion gets a minor update about once every six months, v3.13 was released in May and is not fully Lion compatible - there have been problems with USB devices. There has been talk of a VMware Fusion 4 since late last year but the product is still an internal Beta.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Just one other thing. Was thinking of upgrading to Lion, and got a pop-up from Parallels today telling me to buy v6 - it's the only one which will work with Lion. Grrrrrr!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,449 ✭✭✭✭Creamy Goodness


    has virtualbox been upgraded yet to use bootcamp partitions? don't really want to have to have two copies of xp installed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    has virtualbox been upgraded yet to use bootcamp partitions? don't really want to have to have two copies of xp installed.

    Nope.


Advertisement