how blatant can you get?

digme

Pakistan tells US to leave 'drone' attack base


Pakistan ends US use of base for drone attacks


US Rejects Pakistani Demand to Leave Air Base


US Fears Afghan Supply Lines Could Be Cut in Pakistan


At Least 120 Killed This Week as Karachi Violence Continues


US suspends $800m in Pakistan military aid


Pakistan Courts China as US Announces Military Aid Cuts


Pakistan Tells U.S. "Keep Your Stinking Blood Money!"


U.S. Drones Kill 45 In Pakistan; 2nd Highest Death Toll Ever


Pakistan - Chemical being used in drone attacks: Ajmal Khan


Pakistan: US drone attacks kill 61 in 24 hours


Three blasts rock Mumbai; 8 reported dead, 70 injured



And now we have the usual sources of lies.


The Guardian

Mumbai blasts renew scrutiny of Pakistan's crackdown on militants

The Telegraph

Pakistan will be suspect until evil in its midst is rooted out

After all the news of the world scandals and us finding out they even made up stories to sell papers.Shouldn't these parasites be shut down too?

phantom_lord

Em, it was the Guardian that led with and exposed most of the NOTW stuff.

Jonny7

digme wrote: »

After all the news of the world scandals and us finding out they even made up stories to sell papers.Shouldn't these parasites be shut down too?

What NOTW scandals were made up?

RMD

I'd much rather take the word of the Guardian and Telegraph as much as I dislike them than a bunch of pinko-liberal nuts and their anti-war buddies.

My name is URL

RMD wrote: »

pinko-liberal nuts and their anti-war buddies.

Anti-war? wtf does that even mean?

You really think that the 'nuts' are those that oppose unnecessary bloodshed?

Jonny7

My name is URL wrote: »

Anti-war? wtf does that even mean?

You really think that the 'nuts' are those that oppose unnecessary bloodshed?

I think he means the group who run the website that OP got most of his links from.

My name is URL

Jonny7 wrote: »

I think he means the group who run the website that OP got most of his links from.

Well antiwar.com is certainly no pinko-liberal website. In fact, its founder is quite a conservative right-wing libertarian, who just happens to have the sense to see why aggressive warfare is not always the best way to go about things.

I suspect that RMD wrongly equates anybody who does not support the US' foreign policies to being left-wing crusties or similar. Quite a juvenile stance to take, really.

Jonny7

From the site -

"While openly acknowledging that we have an agenda, the editors take seriously our purely journalistic mission, which is to get past the media filters and reveal the truth about America's foreign policy"

As good as getting it from a site called www.prowar.com

I still haven't heard from OP.. I don't even really understand this thread.