Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
Raptorex = Tarbosaurus?
-
05-09-2019 1:42am#1Whilst debate is ongoing as to whether or not Nanotyrannus of Cretaceous North America is a juvenile Tyrannosaurus or not, a similar debate has emerged in relation to two Asian tyrannosaurs.
Raptorex kreigsteini was believed to be a 'primitive' small bodied ancestor type to the giant tyrannosaurs of the late Cretaceous. However, a new paper (available for free at PLoS ONE) questions this conclusion. It appears that Raptorex is almost certainly a juvenile of something larger, possibly Tarbosaurus. Another idea is that it does represent it's own valid genus, but reports of it being adult or close to adult age look to be erroneous.
Failed to load the poll.0
Advertisement