Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Computer calibration, tyre circumference

  • 05-07-2011 02:07PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,429 ✭✭✭


    My tyres are marked with 700x35c.
    On Sheldon Browns tyre chart, he lists 700x35 as having a circumference of 117cm. However when I do a roll out test with the wheel, I get a measurement of 119cm.

    Who's right?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Morgan


    The measurements on the Sheldon Brown site are (good) approximations. Your own measurement will be more accurate, assuming you measured it accurately.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,456 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    dnme wrote: »
    My tyres are marked with 700x35c.
    On Sheldon Browns tyre chart, he lists 700x35 as having a circumference of 117cm. However when I do a roll out test with the wheel, I get a measurement of 119cm.

    Who's right?
    Roll out is actual so should be correct if the tyre is correctly inflated and you have your full weight on the bike.

    FWIW I've found a difference of up to 300m or so on my commute (pre-Garmin) depending on how inflated the tyres were


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,429 ✭✭✭dnme


    I have the tyres at about 90psi (they are rated 100) and did the rollout test by marking the tyre at the valve right down to ground and marking the ground aswell, then rolling it in a straight line one revolution and marking the ground again. It's precisely 219cm. I did the test off the bike btw.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,456 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    You need to do it sat on the bike - your weight shortens the radius at the point of contact, reducing the distance travelled accordingly

    And it's not simply a matter of putting the right amount of weight on the bike - its distribution will impact on the two wheels differently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,429 ✭✭✭dnme


    Beasty wrote: »
    You need to do it sat on the bike - your weight shortens the radius at the point of contact, reducing the distance travelled accordingly

    And it's not simply a matter of putting the right amount of weight on the bike - its distribution will impact on the two wheels differently

    ah it'll do!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement