false Louis Walsh sex claims

alex73

From the start the whole think did smell a bit like opportunism of someone out of a quick buck..

But a local priest had a accusation made against him by a woman who claimed she was abused some 20 years ago. She made accusation to HSE in counselling who contacted Gardai, Bishop suspended the Priest and he is not working. He does not even know the identity of the person making the accusation. The priest is from the area and was never moved fro parish to parish and has been a priest for 45 odd years. The woman who made the accusation later contact the HSE to say that it was not meant to be malicious.. but the priest does not know what this means as HSE won't reveal her identity and priest has to work via a solicitor.

Anyway, I am not here to defend the priest of Louis,,... But in the case of Louis it seems that justice moved very fast in investigating the case while the priest I know has had the cloud of accusation over him for the last 18 months.

My point, shouldn't all these accusations be treated and investigated in the proper way.. seems like there is one rule from celebrities that have the media spotlight on them while there is another rule for others.

Owen

Tell the truth, you had sex with Louis. Didn't you ...

starbelgrade

I don't know. I have no interest in Louis Walsh or media "sex scandals".

I hadn't even heard there was one.

yoshytoshy

Looey walsh ,tone def mutha.

Guill

Louis and his sneaky little fingers...

Latchy

Louis Walsh has to have bodyguards now ?

Oh dear ...who the fcuk really cares ?

Biggins

The reason why the matter was cleared up so quick was that there was video evidence inside and outside the club that supposedly confirmed Louis version of events.
The footage helped speed up a decision as to who was telling the truth and/or the validity of the claim.
End of story.

alex73

Biggins wrote: »

The reason why the matter was cleared up so quick was that there was video evidence inside and outside the club that supposedly confirmed Louis version of events.
The footage helped speed up a decision as to who was telling the truth and/or the validity of the claim.
End of story.

Quiet right.. Problem is that without knowing the persons name or dates of abuse the priest can't present evident to contrary. Most priest have parish registers to trace back what they were doing on certain dates. There also seems a reluctance of the justice system to investigate the accusation (obviously given the history of Church abuse and coverup)

however each case should be treated on its own merit with due diligence and this is obviously not the case in Ireland.

sollar

Biggins wrote: »

The reason why the matter was cleared up so quick was that there was video evidence inside and outside the club that supposedly confirmed Louis version of events.
The footage helped speed up a decision as to who was telling the truth and/or the validity of the claim.
End of story.

The accuser should be prosecuted

Mr. Denton

Who has Louis been touching now (besides all of us with his lovely music of course)?

Vicxas

I know the accuser, hes a nutter.

bmarley

alex73 wrote: »

From the start the whole think did smell a bit like opportunism of someone out of a quick buck..

But a local priest had a accusation made against him by a woman who claimed she was abused some 20 years ago. She made accusation to HSE in counselling who contacted Gardai, Bishop suspended the Priest and he is not working. He does not even know the identity of the person making the accusation. The priest is from the area and was never moved fro parish to parish and has been a priest for 45 odd years. The woman who made the accusation later contact the HSE to say that it was not meant to be malicious.. but the priest does not know what this means as HSE won't reveal her identity and priest has to work via a solicitor.

Anyway, I am not here to defend the priest of Louis,,... But in the case of Louis it seems that justice moved very fast in investigating the case while the priest I know has had the cloud of accusation over him for the last 18 months.

My point, shouldn't all these accusations be treated and investigated in the proper way.. seems like there is one rule from celebrities that have the media spotlight on them while there is another rule for others.

Well why wasn't this case fully investigated or is it an ongoing investigation? I can't imagine why she would make up a story such as this.

Biggins

sollar wrote: »

The accuser should be prosecuted

According to a report in the Mirror (Page one and seven) this is being looked at.
The person is facing a possible jail term of up to 5 years. Not likely to get that but will be held accountable for their attempts it seems, according to the police prococuting bodies involved.
Louis, the paper reported (if you can trust any paper) stated that he was not going to let the matter rest either.
He too is seeking re-dress, probably though the courts.

Aidric

Vicxas wrote: »

I know the accuser, hes a nutter.

Is it this fella? Probably got sick of Louis' moralising and hypocrisy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gu6d0ns-JJU

alex73

bmarley wrote: »

Well why wasn't this case fully investigated or is it an ongoing investigation? I can't imagine why she would make up a story such as this.

Money.

Bishop when he told the parish about the accusation said there were never 1 single accusation made about the priest in 45 years of parish Priest. Of course only the priest and the accuser know the real truth.. but the investigation has been dragged out 18 months.

SuperInfinity

Aidric wrote: »

Is it this fella? Probably got sick of Louis' moralising and hypocrisy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gu6d0ns-JJU

Woah, hold on there... that guy was a legend... in his own way.

This guy was some sort of scumbag waster, malicious, a wanker.

I have no idea why you'd compare the two.

biko

Art/Celebs please.
Also some source/linkage would help.