Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A problem with infinitesimals

  • 27-06-2011 10:05am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8


    I've been playing around with a free PDF Calculus book lately. But, I have no way to check the logic used to get to a particular answer. I've been trying to find the standard part for:

    (1/ɛ)((1/sqrt(4+ɛ))-(1/2))

    I've tried every way I could think of to algebraically manipulate this in order to avoid dividing by zero (taking the standard part of 1/ɛ). Just by looking at the problem, I would think it would be undefined...but the odd answers tell me otherwise.

    Thanks :)


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    I'm not sure what the standard part is exactly, Wikipedia makes it out to be something similar to taking a limit. Using limits you could apply L'Hopital's rule here to get an answer, maybe something similar for this case?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,062 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Multiplying by 1/infinity is the same as multiplying by zero is it not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭MathsManiac


    Sounds like "non-standard analysis", which I know nothing about, but I agree that this is probably a formulation in that theory of what we normally consider as the limit as epsilon goes to 0.

    If that's the case, l'Hopital's rule gives the answer as -1/16.

    Here's how you can do it without l'Hopital's rule:

    I'll use h instead of epsilon, if you don't mind, and unfortunately, I can't LaTeX!

    First, bring together the two fractions in the second bracket:

    (1/h)[(2-sqrt(4+h))/(2sqrt(4+h))]

    Next, note that h can be written as the following, using the difference of two squares: (sqrt(4+h)-2)(sqrt(4+h)+2).

    Substituting that for the h in the 1/h term allows you to cancel one of those factors (at values infinitely close, but not equal, to h=0) to get (-1)/[2(sqrt(4+h)+2)sqrt(4+h)].

    This latter expression can readily be evaluated at h=0 to give -1/16.

    Is that the kind of answer you were looking for?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Is it not just a case of

    2 - sqrt 4 + ɛ / ɛ2 sqrt 4 + ɛ

    and then conjugate the numerator and multiply


Advertisement