Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

an ignorant question

  • 20-06-2011 12:35pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭


    I confess but I wonder , as the Greek situation seems to be coming to a conclusion (?) whether the consequences being mooted for countries such as Portugal, Spain ,Italy and Ireland ( the list could be longer ...) are consequences , in the case of Ireland in particular that may (have ) been due even if the economy here had been managed in a perfect way (or at least in a half decent way)
    I appreciate that this is an academic (?) and hypothetical question but was this a bullet that Ireland was never going to dodge?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 138 ✭✭aftermn


    Access to credit is wonderful, even necessary. Debt is dangerous, as we are now finding out.

    If we had no debt we need have no fear of the bullit, but if we had no debt would we still be mainly an agricultural economy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Don't really understand the question.
    I think you're asking if we would have needed a bailout, if our economy had been properly managed?

    The answer is probably not, imo.
    The reason we needed a bailout, is because we could no longer borrow on the bond markets.

    Why could we no longer borrow on the bond markets?
    At the moment, we are having the equivalent of a mini-banking crisis, every single year, due to the ongoing obscene borrowing/spending. The budget hole over the last 3 years has been in excess of €70 billion I believe. So another 3 years of this, and it will have been like a second banking crisis all over again.

    Investors are not scared of Ireland because of one large bank bailout mistake, realistically the opposite is true -> that would prove that we are a safe country to invest in, because we privatise profits and socialise debts.

    The reason they are scared is because the government continues to grossly mismanage the economy, 3 years after the banking crisis and even after a change of government.
    i.e. Not only have we not shown investors that we are capable of repaying them, we've made it crystal clear that we can't even sustain ourselves.

    This is not going to change.

    Our government are not going to close the defecit through reduction in expenditure, they are going to do it through taxation.
    Investors know that in a country like Ireland, high taxation=minimal growth, especially with so much wasteful government spending.

    This waffle about going back to the bond markets in 2013 is just PR.
    We will be looking for another bailout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭geordief


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    Don't really understand the question.
    .

    maybe that is what I meant about it being an ignorant (ie a bit vague and more of a feeling than an opinion) question.I think I was saying that all the states in Europe seem to be at some sort of a risk and Ireland ,being so small ( and with the altruism/solidarity ) of some of the European countries appearing lacking could be vulnerable even if the economy had been managed within accepted norms of correctness (including the banks of course)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭Beau


    No we would be completely fine then! No deficit equals no borrowing.


Advertisement