Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Honda Accord 2.4 Type S

  • 11-05-2011 8:47pm
    #1
    x in the city
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,134 ✭✭✭


    Guys

    Anyone here have on of these , erm bad boys...:p

    I am looking into 'maybe' getting one. They have exec and type s models in the 2.4 lump.

    just thought anyone might pass comments, I think they are frugal enough for a 2.4 and should do 30mpg, better than a guzzling Is200 anyday.

    bombproof is natural of course.


Comments

  • #2
    EPM
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    Why a 2.4 type s? For better performance over the 2 litre? A Euro R might be worth a look then


  • #3
    x in the city
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,134 ✭✭✭x in the city


    dont want a euro r, too skangarised or something for my taste,

    and I would imagine it would get you 20mpg.

    the type s seems more normal and less risque..!

    2.4 it may be but its still more economical than most 2 litres out there.

    has anyone actually owned one?


  • #4
    Nissan doctor
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,223 ✭✭✭Nissan doctor


    Unless you are doing alot of kms the much higher tax on the 2.4 would outweigh any fuel savings IMO.


    A standard euro R looks basically identical to a type S.


  • #5
    Marty McFly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    The Type S and Euro R are identical on the outside apart from the euro r badges and the double exhaust from the outside. The interior is different alright i prefer the type S interior.

    Were did you get the infortmation youd get 30mpg from the 2.4? I find that veyr hard to believe since i drive the Irish Type S which is a 2.0 litre and i dont get that.


  • #6
    TestTransmission
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,106 ✭✭✭✭TestTransmission


    x in the city wrote: »
    dont want a euro r, too skangarised or something for my taste,

    and I would imagine it would get you 20mpg.

    the type s seems more normal and less risque..!

    2.4 it may be but its still more economical than most 2 litres out there.

    has anyone actually owned one?

    Euro R owner here,don't think I've ever had anyone comment that it was too "skangarised",I also get around 30mpg :)
    Nissan doctor wrote: »
    Unless you are doing alot of kms the much higher tax on the 2.4 would outweigh any fuel savings IMO.


    A standard euro R looks basically identical to a type S.

    Euro R looks better ;)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement