Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Those mysterious extinct animals no one talks about

Options
  • 08-05-2011 7:40am
    #1
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Hey, I don´t know if u have a thread like this already, but I thought it would be interesting. You know how there are always rumors about certain fossil animals being found somewhere, and it sounds like very exciting news but no one talks about them and you can´t find info on them online?


    For example, they say they found a HUGE fossil parrot in Easter Island, but I haven´t found anything at all about it! WBU?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    Thats a new one on me. Never heard about a giant parrot from Easter Island. I would be happy to talk about it if it let me get a word in.:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭gbee


    That parrot is probably not a parrot at all. A discovery is made and announced to the science world. After investigation they may deuce that there is insufficient data to corroborate, they suspect a hoax, it's a happen-stance of land fill, it's misidentified, it's identified by someone else or as something else.

    It's then just quietly dropped for a while. Cases get re-looked as science progresses and a new assumption may emerge either totally changing the initial finding or collaborating them after years and years of dormancy.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    gbee wrote: »
    That parrot is probably not a parrot at all. A discovery is made and announced to the science world. After investigation they may deuce that there is insufficient data to corroborate, they suspect a hoax, it's a happen-stance of land fill, it's misidentified, it's identified by someone else or as something else.

    It's then just quietly dropped for a while. Cases get re-looked as science progresses and a new assumption may emerge either totally changing the initial finding or collaborating them after years and years of dormancy.

    Oh well, that sucks, cuz 1) a giant parrot would be awesome and 2) we may die tomorrow and never find out!

    There are also those Utahraptor remains that suggest a much larger size than expected. Back when I wrote to Jim Kirkland, he first told me that the whole thing was "a rumor" (which of course doesn´t mean it isn´t truth), then some time later he admitted that there was new material and that it would change our view of Utahraptor, and then he said those things about its skull looking very different than we always thought AND its being more of a juggernaut than a speedster, powerful enough to knock a house down (that's what he said, anyways...).
    He also said that everything would be revealed in October, but I suspect he meant to paleontologists; I don´t know when we mere mortals will be told. :(

    Also, they say there are new remains of Deinocheirus (!!) and rumor has it that it was indeed an ornithomimosaur, but unlike anything we have seen before. (We kinda knew that but still, what did the thing look like??). Anyone knows anything about this?

    And I could go on and on. There's a rumor about raptors found in Brazil that would have coexisted with Oxalaia, as well as the fact that the famed Aramberri Monster wasn´t a pliosaur after all, there's the Mycocephale Paul Sereno introduced in a documentary (a cat-sized pachycephalosaur, either a re-naming of Microcephale or a new genus), a fossil nest supossedly belonging to Tyrannosaurus or other tyrannosaur...
    It's really frustrating to know that all these things exist, but to have no further info on it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


    Adam Khor wrote: »
    For example, they say they found a HUGE fossil parrot in Easter Island, but I haven´t found anything at all about it! WBU?

    Easter Island is made of igneous rock so a fossil of a giant parrot is unlikely.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    tricky D wrote: »
    Easter Island is made of igneous rock so a fossil of a giant parrot is unlikely.

    That's what I thought too, but researching a little I found that fossils of several bird species have indeed been found...


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    I'd say a lot has to do with the media atrocious inaccurate reporting of science related stories. Paleontologists probably don't like to release a story until it has been fully verified in case they have their names attached to sensationalist inaccurate reports.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    yekahS wrote: »
    I'd say a lot has to do with the media atrocious inaccurate reporting of science related stories. Paleontologists probably don't like to release a story until it has been fully verified in case they have their names attached to sensationalist inaccurate reports.

    But do they really need so much time to do that? >.<


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Will we ever know about Das Monster von Minden?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Monster_von_Minden


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭Alvin T. Grey


    Its simple really, there are only so many column inches, and most of those are taken up by T-Rex ancestors.

    I'm sure that T-Rex feels like a lotto winner. Suddenly he's got millions of relatives.....


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    I'm sure that T-Rex feels like a lotto winner. Suddenly he's got millions of relatives.....

    XDD :pac:

    You're probably right...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭Alvin T. Grey


    I never heard of Baryonyx until all the "Look-at-me-I'm-so-cool-I-can-kill-a-T-Rex" Spino hype.

    (Hate that dinosaur.)

    However I like Baryonyx. Bary is cool.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Will we ever know about Das Monster von Minden?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Monster_von_Minden
    I wonder is there much of this in Palaeontology? Perhaps where someone carrying out a small or indepedently-funded dig, gets so far with it and then runs out of money, or finds themselves offered cash by a private collector, or otherwise fails to properly catalogue and report on their findings?


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    seamus wrote: »
    I wonder is there much of this in Palaeontology? Perhaps where someone carrying out a small or indepedently-funded dig, gets so far with it and then runs out of money, or finds themselves offered cash by a private collector, or otherwise fails to properly catalogue and report on their findings?

    Seems to happen an awful lot. In other cases like the famous Sue situation, palaeontologists were allowed dig to their hearts' content... until they found something valuable (ie: a T. rex). Suddenly everybody was in on the action and claiming ownership :rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Here's another one. They say they found an ankylosaur in Africa... anyone knows more about this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭Alvin T. Grey


    Adam Khor wrote: »
    Here's another one. They say they found an ankylosaur in Africa... anyone knows more about this?
    The guys who found it?:D


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    The guys who found it?:D

    Ha ha. :(


Advertisement