Tawdy In Royal Wedding Photo

Luckycharms_74

....

Nolanger

You don't need Tawdy to ruin those photos with that little girl in the left corner!

mike65

Orientation of image: 1
File change date and time: 2011:05:02 18:22:08
Image description: The Royal Wedding Group in the Throne Room at Buckingham Palace on 29th April 2011 with the Bride and Groom, TRH The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge in the centre.
Front row (left to right): Miss Grace van Cutsem, Miss Eliza Lopes, HRH The Duke of Edinburgh, HM The Queen, The Hon. Margarita Armstrong-Jones, Lady Louise Windsor, Master William Lowther-Pinkerton.
Back Row (left to right): Master Tom Pettifer, HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, HRH The Prince of Wales, HRH Prince Henry of Wales, Mr Michael Middleton, Mrs Michael Middleton, Mr James Middleton, Miss Philippa Middleton.
Picture Credit: Photograph by Hugo Burnand
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Person who created the image: Hugo Burnand
Copyright holder: St James's Palace

To the tower!

homolumo

I miss the Tawdy pics.

catib999

You don't need Tawdy to ruin those photos with that little girl in the left corner!

AdMMM

Why were they deleted?!

seanybiker

No idear

Minstrel27

AdMMM wrote: »

Why were they deleted?!

Probably because of the poor photoshop

honeybadger

think the hi-lighted text in mike65 post says it all.pity tho,,,any one in power here or clever enough to be able to whizz tawdy off to the queens visit and maybe snap a few select shots of the famous duo together and keep copyright il even supply the cider for the big event haha

seanybiker

Minstrel27 wrote: »

Probably because of the poor photoshop

Yeah will did look a bit like a pompous tit alright

Luckycharms_74

Minstrel27 wrote: »

Probably because of the poor photoshop

Looking forward to your effort ..............

AdMMM

honeybadger wrote: »

think the hi-lighted text in mike65 post says it all.pity tho,,,any one in power here or clever enough to be able to whizz tawdy off to the queens visit and maybe snap a few select shots of the famous duo together and keep copyright il even supply the cider for the big event haha

That's the worst excuse ever. Threads like You Laugh You Lose are full of photoshops of the exact same photo!

Minstrel27

Luckycharms_74 wrote: »

Looking forward to your effort ..............

I have no desire to do so.

Luckycharms_74

AdMMM wrote: »

That's the worst excuse ever. Threads like You Laugh You Lose are full of photoshops of the exact same photo!

Link please

AdMMM

That's the thread: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055873286

Worth mentioning that I didn't mean the same photo with Tawdy in it, just that people have used the same base photo to add in other characters.

Luckycharms_74

AdMMM wrote: »

That's the thread: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055873286

Worth mentioning that I didn't mean the same photo with Tawdy in it, just that people have used the same base photo to add in other characters.

I know you did not mean Tawdy photo but the family shot in general

looksee

You don't need Tawdy to ruin those photos with that little girl in the left corner!

The little girl on the left appears to have some sort of medical issue, or possibly she does not. Either way she is a little girl and would have been thrilled to be a bridesmaid. Apparently the other little girl has eyesight issues.

I think it was a lovely, generous, sincere approach to ask children for their own sake, rather than their superficial decorative value. Though both of them looked charming and behaved as perfectly as you would expect of 3 year olds.

What would you have said if you heard that bridesmaids were only selected on the basis of their physical perfection? Please give a bit of thought to what you are saying, rather than making flip, narrow minded comments.

Luckycharms_74

... Close the thread

Nolanger

looksee wrote: »

The little girl on the left appears to have some sort of medical issue

She is Prince William's goddaughter Grace Van Cutsem and doesn't have a medical issue. Maybe you should give a bit of thought to what you are saying, rather than making flip, narrow minded comments?

looksee

If you are going to quote me please put in the entire quote. I went on to say'or maybe she doesn't, either way she is a little girl'. How is it narrow minded or flip to say that she appears to have an issue? People do have medical problems, are you saying it is in some way predjudiced to say that, rather than allow someone to dismiss them as visually offensive, as you did?

looksee

Has this thread run its course? Since the photos cannot be used for copyright issues, the Tawdy connection is no longer relevant. Therefore they have nothing to do with Waterford.

Has anyone any right to use Tawdy as a source of amusement by putting him into photoraphs anyway? If he were a Boards character or a public figure it wouldn't be a problem, but Tawdy is used as a sort of pet eccentric - no doubt affectionately meant but still, he is not likely to be able to reply.

The only remaining source of interest is the appearance of a child in the photograph. It is difficult to see the point of the many posts that appear on Boards simply to insult people's appearance, usually women. Again, it is a pointless and predjudiced discussion and nothing to do with Waterford.

chelloveks

looksee wrote: »

If you are going to quote me please put in the entire quote. I went on to say'or maybe she doesn't, either way she is a little girl'. How is it narrow minded or flip to say that she appears to have an issue? People do have medical problems, are you saying it is in some way predjudiced to say that, rather than allow someone to dismiss them as visually offensive, as you did?

Lets not judge a book by its cover!

looksee

Who is making judgements?

Tragamin2k2

this is why we cant have nice things

Italic letters

STIG83

I saw Tawdy on the Tramore Road earlier, he was sitting down and not a care in the world id say!! a car was pulled in talking to him too.

JdF_64

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=183539295028663&set=o.17528867728&type=1&theater