Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Interesting verbal declaration issue???

  • 15-04-2011 7:58pm
    #1
    eoineoin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7 ✭


    The blinds are 50 - 100. the table folds around to the button who bets 300.
    Small blind folds.
    Big blind has 405 chips total including his 100 blind, he has all his chips in his hands while he thinks aloud and says the words "I am gonna have to call this".
    5 seconds later he puts the whole pile of chips in and announces "all in for 405"
    Question - is saying "I am gonna have to call this" equivalent to a verbal declaration of a call? Or is the player entitled to go all in?

    In this particular case the problem was resolved by the button and the big blind agreeing to allowing the all-in since it was so small as to be almost irrelevant and nearly inevitable post flop.
    The button won with a pair of kings.

    In a different situation (eg where there were more chips involved) this could have been a serious problem. As it was the debate over the decision went on to disrupt the table for over an hour after the hand had been dealt.

    Can anyone (especially experienced tournament directors) help us with this question?
    Tagged:


Comments

Advertisement