Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rules Question

  • 14-04-2011 4:13pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,035 ✭✭✭


    Situation: Player has to hit his third shot towards the green. when approaching the ball, he notices that a footpath is in-line with the intended swing. i.e. if he hits the ball, he is going to hit the footpath in his follow thru. We both agree that he has relief from the footpath as an immovable obstruction, no issue.

    I follow the footpath around to the Green, while he is playing his shot, but I don't actually see his stroke. when I get to the green, it is obvious that he has duffed his shot, as the ball has only moved 5-6 yards from his previous position.

    He plays his 4th stroke, onto the green, and while marking the ball, he says "I was better off with my original lie, sure I had to stand on the footpath after the drop". I queried him on this, as I thought that one had to take "full relief" when taking a drop from an immovable obstruction. He countered that the reason he took relief originally, was not because of his stance, but was because of the fact that his wedge was going to hit the path.

    We looked up the rule and it states "A dropped ball must be re-dropped if it rolls to a position where there is interference from the condition from which relief is being taken" , which is actually open to interpretation, especially around the word "condition".

    So, who was correct? Me or Him?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,185 ✭✭✭G1032


    You were correct


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    IITYWYBMAD wrote: »
    Situation: Player has to hit his third shot towards the green. when approaching the ball, he notices that a footpath is in-line with the intended swing. i.e. if he hits the ball, he is going to hit the footpath in his follow thru. We both agree that he has relief from the footpath as an immovable obstruction, no issue.

    I follow the footpath around to the Green, while he is playing his shot, but I don't actually see his stroke. when I get to the green, it is obvious that he has duffed his shot, as the ball has only moved 5-6 yards from his previous position.

    He plays his 4th stroke, onto the green, and while marking the ball, he says "I was better off with my original lie, sure I had to stand on the footpath after the drop". I queried him on this, as I thought that one had to take "full relief" when taking a drop from an immovable obstruction. He countered that the reason he took relief originally, was not because of his stance, but was because of the fact that his wedge was going to hit the path.

    We looked up the rule and it states "A dropped ball must be re-dropped if it rolls to a position where there is interference from the condition from which relief is being taken" , which is actually open to interpretation, especially around the word "condition".

    So, who was correct? Me or Him?

    You were imo.
    Relief was from the path, not from the club hitting the path.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 133 ✭✭ernieprice


    You were correct

    He must drop the ball within 1 club length of nearest point of relief (this point allows for his stance and he does not need to stand on the path)

    24-2. Immovable Obstruction
    a. Interference
    Interference by an immovable obstruction occurs when a ball lies in or
    on the
    obstruction, or when the obstruction interferes with the player’s
    stance or the area of his intended swing. If the player’s ball lies on the
    putting green, interference also occurs if an immovable obstruction on
    the
    putting green intervenes on his line of putt. Otherwise, intervention
    on the
    line of play is not, of itself, interference under this Rule.
    b. Relief
    Except when the ball is in a water hazard or a lateral water hazard, a
    player may take relief from interference by an immovable
    obstruction
    as follows:
    (i) Through the Green: If the ball lies through the green, the player
    must lift the ball and drop it, without penalty, within one club-length
    of and not nearer the
    hole than the nearest point of relief.The
    nearest point of relief must not be in a hazard or on a putting green.
    When the ball is dropped within one club-length of the nearest
    point of relief
    , the ball must first strike a part of the course at a spot
    that avoids interference by the immovable
    obstruction and is not in
    a
    hazard and not on a putting green.
    96 Rule 24


Advertisement