Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Does Ireland need a new Constitution??

  • 03-04-2011 11:51pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 155 ✭✭


    Labours election manifesto argued we do and now that they're in government we may begin to see them pushing the agenda they had laid out..

    So the question is do you think we need a new Constitution?

    I believe that some parts are outdated and need to be amended surely, but we cant just throw out de Valeras masterpiece,
    the good ol' Bunreacht na hEireann can we??


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭KerranJast


    A Constitutional Convention would be a very good idea. Various representatives of different groups in society along with a "superjury" of ordinary citizens would go through the current document and recommend amendments/removals.

    TBH we need to do what the French did and have a 2nd Republic. Clean slate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭234


    I agree with the OP. Most the problems in question are precieved rather than actual. Any problems that do exist can be solved by ammendment. It would do far more harm than good to throw away our current constitution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,472 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    A document drafted in the 1930's by a catholic church loving government with ultra conservative views is of no relevance to today's nation. I agree start afresh with a 2nd republic.


  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    No. We don't need an entirely new constitution, we need to expunge the bits mentioned above and make it completely secular. Enhance the rights elements from being unenumerated/unspecified and also modify some other small areas. No need to reinvent the wheel!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 155 ✭✭Rhamiel


    A document drafted in the 1930's by a catholic church loving government with ultra conservative views is of no relevance to today's nation. I agree start afresh with a 2nd republic.

    Indeed it was a very catholic influenced drafting, however I believe it was also a derivative from sound social democratic teaching at the time. The special place of the catholic church has been removed, thank god (excuse the irony :P) by amendment, and slowly but surely other overly catholic ideology is being amended.
    If the constitution is scrapped what happens to all the important precedent and philosophies our State has its fundamental foundations in?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 155 ✭✭Rhamiel


    Tom Young wrote: »
    No. We don't need an entirely new constitution, we need to expunge the bits mentioned above and make it completely secular. Enhance the rights elements from being unenumerated/unspecified and also modify some other small areas. No need to reinvent the wheel!

    I'd agree, although the courts appear to be comprehensive enough in 'discovering' rights and seem to view this as being more favourable than specifically enumerating them.
    An area badly in need of amendment in my opinion are the articles 41 & 42 in relation to family and education. This is definitely an area that needs to be secular as you say.. its completely biased towards the catholic ideology of marriage!


  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    As a hook to hang many things off, the Constitution as is, has endured.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    It's grand. Few things need to be removed but broadly, it's a pretty damn good Constitution. I see no need to scrap it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭234


    A document drafted in the 1930's by a catholic church loving government with ultra conservative views is of no relevance to today's nation. I agree start afresh with a 2nd republic.
    Yes, but if you look at how the Constitution operates in practice there are pleanty of instances where the court found that the Constitution mandated a position that was directly contrary to Catholic teaching. Some aspects still retain a Catholic influence, some are much more progressive.
    Gerard Hogan (Now Hogan J) wrote a great article on this a few years ago: ‘De Valera, the Constitution and the historians’ (2005) 40 Ir. Jur. (ns.) 293.


Advertisement