Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Good DI box - will it make a difference?

Options
  • 25-03-2011 4:20pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭


    hi,

    I'm wondering, does the quality of a DI box make a huge difference to your sound? Lately I've been DI-ing my guitar directly into my interface (a UA25-ex which has a Hi-Z input) and using Overloud TH2 and Revalver (demo version) to get the sounds I want.

    anyways, it was mentioned to me that a "proper"/dedicated DI box would yield a better tone from these programs, but to be honest, I'm finding it hard to see how as surely the DI box would still have to go through my interface so the signal would go through the same AD converters as directly hooking my guitar to the interface?

    Personally I think that putting the money towards a new interface would be the better option, but since I dont have a dedicated DI box to compare I'm completely open to the idea that I could be (and I probably am!) wrong on this one.....

    So I guess I'm asking if a dedicated DI box would make much of a difference? If so, any recommendations? Is it a "one-box-fits-all" for genres or what?
    I was looking at a Sansamp Para Driver DI as I was told that it was excellent, but for E240 on Thomann it seems a bit pricey for a DI box....

    thanks guys! :)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭i57dwun4yb1pt8


    it will make a difference for the better
    , even better would be a good mic preamp with DI capability

    but
    i think a far better interface with a dedicated di built in will give you the best improvement all round .

    I dont think the one you have is worth putting a top di in front of.


    my setup has a great interface, with a dedicated DI ,
    but , i actually use a di capable good mic preamp , then into the interface


    you could also consider a gsp 1101 , as a second sound card , with full guitar processing capability , for guitars and bass.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    Yes it does make a difference. But only if you already have good speakers and acoustic treatment in the room you use for mixing. If you spent €200 on 8 rolls of rockwool and stacked them in the corner on your mix room, you stand a much better chance of being able to hear the difference between DI boxes or audio interfaces.

    Actually that would cost less than €200...

    Your interface is fine. I would recommend the ART passive DI if you want a bit of colour, or a BSS DI if you want to get exactly what the guitar puts out. If you're using an amp sim it doesn't make sense to use those DIs that are very characterful.


  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭drumdrum


    DaDumTish wrote: »
    it will make a difference for the better
    , even better would be a good mic preamp with DI capability

    but
    i think a far better interface with a dedicated di built in will give you the best improvement all round .

    I dont think the one you have is worth putting a top di in front of.


    my setup has a great interface, with a dedicated DI ,
    but , i actually use a di capable good mic preamp , then into the interface


    you could also consider a gsp 1101 , as a second sound card , with full guitar processing capability , for guitars and bass.

    Ha! Thanks mate, thats what I was afraid the responses would be! :) I know the interface I want, and am saving for it now. (MR816X - its amazing! :D )

    Yeah the UA25-ex is great for getting quick ideas down / in the field recording, but I wouldn't try making anything to release on it! Can I ask what "di capable good mic preamp" you use, and would it be suitable for heavier music? I was looking at a Radial J48 which was recommended to me, but I figured no point driving a good signal into poor AD converters. New interface it is so... plus you can DI with the MR816X also...it has a hi-z port so it might tide me over.....

    I probably should of mentioned that I'm looking to use the DI signal to run through Ampltude 3 or Overlouds TH2 amp modeller programs which IMO sound great.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭i57dwun4yb1pt8


    as mad theory said

    its all irrlevant if you dont have a good mix setup ( room . treatment )

    but i think you are using at50 head phones , which should do for the moment anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    drumdrum wrote: »
    but I figured no point driving a good signal into poor AD converters.
    Nah, you're not going to hear any difference with converters until you're spending over €1000 on a stand alone device that is not USB or Firewire powered. Even then, the difference is very slight.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭i57dwun4yb1pt8


    ^^^ i disagree

    ive had

    1/ pod xt interface 200 quid
    2/ mackie firewire onyx interface 300 quid
    3/ finally tc electronics studio konnekt 48 - 1000 quid

    the converter and backend monitoring capability vastly increased from 2 to 3

    1 to 2 wasnt much

    and why not firewire ? its just a pipe like adat .


  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭drumdrum


    About the Firewire/usb/adat comments. Are you talking about the connection to your interface or hard drive? Or external hard drive?
    If its external hard drive than Firewire 400 is a minimum requirement IMO. Ive had issues with a cheap external over usb 2 with a 20 track project. I find a fast spindle speed (7200rpm) is a necessity also... :)

    EDIT: Just saw....he meant converters. Well I dont know much about the difference to your interface, but surely data is data, and as long as the audio stream gets to your audio converters on time then it shouldnt matter what way its transferred??
    madtheory wrote: »
    Nah, you're not going to hear any difference with converters until you're spending over €1000 on a stand alone device that is not USB or Firewire powered. Even then, the difference is very slight.

    Sorry madtheory but I'm going to have to disagree with you slightly on this one. :)

    I've used an Apogee Duet (about €450 online) and compared it against my interface when recording a simple acoustic guitar track. Apogee definitely sounded better IMO. More clearer and more high end to it....maybe its the infamous "Apogee sound" but it did sound great.
    I'd imagine that with tracks building up in a bigger project this extra clarity would only become more apparent.

    I will agree, Duet aside, that most interfaces around the €200 - €400 have little difference but you do find gems in the odd bit of hardware that make the recording that big better. And not every thing is price related. More expensive does not always mean better.

    This is interesting actually. MR816X (about €630) vs Prism Orpheus (about €4000) "comparison" test.

    As with most "comparison" tests, its to be taken with a pinch of salt of course...still its an interesting read. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    OK, I was being general, but that was to take into account that the OP does not appear to have a good monitoring setup, a good DI or even a good guitar? He's looking for a substantial improvement, don't forget the law of diminishing returns. My point about converters is that generally you have to spend a lot of money for an improvement. This is having done a couple of proper blind AB tests. The differences are so small that it's easy to be fooled. It's also too easy to end up wanting something posh- in my case, a Cranesong HEDD, yum!

    The issue with bus power is that (generally again) it doesn't provide enough voltage for serious headroom in the analogue bits, and it is susceptible to ground loop noise- unless it's carefully designed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭drumdrum


    madtheory wrote: »
    OK, I was being general, but that was to take into account that the OP does not appear to have a good monitoring setup, a good DI or even a good guitar? He's looking for a substantial improvement, don't forget the law of diminishing returns. My point about converters is that generally you have to spend a lot of money for an improvement. This is having done a couple of proper blind AB tests. The differences are so small that it's easy to be fooled. It's also too easy to end up wanting something posh- in my case, a Cranesong HEDD, yum!

    Well, I agree it wont make as big a difference as a different mic pre or anything, but I find that in one vs one tracks, the difference is slight at best. However, when project expand with many tracks this slight difference builds up to a noticeable difference that IMO makes the difference between an average mix and a good mix.
    Sometimes a one vs one difference is noticeable such as with the Duet vs the UA25-ex but it depends on what you're recording also.

    As for my setup, true its not amazing. I'm looking to upgrade my guitar at the moment to something more suitable to the type of music I'm making. I DI directly into my budget interface and I mix on headphones as I dont have the opportunity to mix with monitors (volume issues, neighbours etc) by summer I will be using monitors though (building a little mix room for myself at the moment! :) ). Basically I'm practicing my music production skills and I've achieved some decent results via my headphone mixes. Not amazing, true, but with the right gear and scenario I intend to take full advantage of my "practice" sessions. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Seziertisch


    drumdrum wrote: »
    Well, I agree it wont make as big a difference as a different mic pre or anything, but I find that in one vs one tracks, the difference is slight at best. However, when project expand with many tracks this slight difference builds up to a noticeable difference that IMO makes the difference between an average mix and a good mix.
    Sometimes a one vs one difference is noticeable such as with the Duet vs the UA25-ex but it depends on what you're recording also.

    As for my setup, true its not amazing. I'm looking to upgrade my guitar at the moment to something more suitable to the type of music I'm making. I DI directly into my budget interface and I mix on headphones as I dont have the opportunity to mix with monitors (volume issues, neighbours etc) by summer I will be using monitors though (building a little mix room for myself at the moment! :) ). Basically I'm practicing my music production skills and I've achieved some decent results via my headphone mixes. Not amazing, true, but with the right gear and scenario I intend to take full advantage of my "practice" sessions. :)

    I would recommend upgrading your guitar first and then worrying about the DI. You are right about small differences building up, but buying a DI before you are happy with your guitar is putting the horse before the cart.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭drumdrum


    I would recommend upgrading your guitar first and then worrying about the DI. You are right about small differences building up, but buying a DI before you are happy with your guitar is putting the horse before the cart.

    Oh completely man! +1!!

    I've already sussed out what guitar I'm getting! Only problem is, I'm still waiting on the shop to get more of them in.... been waiting a few weeks so far....:(

    IMO, getting a new guitar is not something you can do over the internet. You need to get the feel for it in the flesh. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    drumdrum wrote: »
    IMO, getting a new guitar is not something you can do over the internet. You need to get the feel for it in the flesh. :)
    +1, unless you're prepared to "flip" web purchases. The advantage of doing that is you have a much wider choice than any Irish shop, but it is not convenient and can get pricey.
    drumdrum wrote: »
    Sometimes a one vs one difference is noticeable such as with the Duet vs the UA25-ex but it depends on what you're recording also.
    This doesn't make as big a difference as one might assume. You can hear this for yourself though, don't take my word for it. Over on gearslutz mastering there's a very good AB of posh converters, where an entire mix was looped from DA to AD (most boxes do ADDA in one). There's another one by the infamous Ethan Winer where an acoustic guitar performance was split at line level after the pre into IIRC an Apogee and a Sound blaster. Definitely different, but very slight. Personally I'd be happy to track with either, given a good performance, mic and mic pre. So IMO 99% of the time the converter is negligible compared to instrument, monitoring etc. etc. because modern converters are really very good, approaching "blameless". It's only slightly more important than what type of dither you use.

    Of course, the word "slight" is subjective.


  • Registered Users Posts: 843 ✭✭✭trackmixstudio


    I use a BSS box for clean signal and it sounds great, especially if you plan to re amp the signal later.
    For coloured DI I use a Phoenix audio DRS. Makes bass sound fat and warm.
    A good di will make a huge difference but for acoustic guitar, even a **** mic and pre will sound better than the onboard pickup IME.


Advertisement