Confirmed: Crazy religious girl is a troll

loldog · 15-03-2011 11:58AM #1

Some idiot locked the thread. :mad:

Here, to settle the matter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQfCjuOr1oY

She was a very good troll, very amusing. She seems nice, too bad she'll burn in hell, jk lol.

.

Fanny Cradock · 15-03-2011 12:04PM

She took it too far, silly girl.

Fanny Cradock · 15-03-2011 12:09PM

loldog wrote: »

Some idiot locked the thread. :mad:

Now, now.

PDN · 15-03-2011 12:11PM

A lesson for the gullible!

Zombrex · 15-03-2011 12:36PM

While a lot of people were convinced, I always suspected.

She was clearly acting like what she viewed a religious nut job would be like rather than actually being a religious nut job. She had none of the classic randomness of someone who is genuinely unhinged (of which YouTube is full). Difference between someone parodying Charlie Sheen and actually being Charlie Sheen. It is true what they say, fact is stranger than fiction.

old hippy · 15-03-2011 12:41PM

PDN wrote: »

A lesson for the gullible!

Religious folk or those who have family in Japan and are not so appreciative of all the humour flying about, currently?

georgieporgy · 15-03-2011 12:44PM

Do we all assume she was/is an atheist then?;)

Zombrex · 15-03-2011 12:51PM

georgieporgy wrote: »

Do we all assume she was/is an atheist then?;)

Probably. Though I think that idea will piss atheists off a bit less than the idea that she was a Christian pissed off the Christians :pac:

JimiTime · 15-03-2011 12:58PM

Wicknight wrote: »

Probably. Though I think that idea will piss atheists off a bit less than the idea that she was a Christian pissed off the Christians :pac:

I really don't get people getting p1ssed off about stuff like this. You think people like this don't exist? What p1sses me off though, is when some bozo thinks that if they find people like this who are genuine, that it somehow undermines Christianity, or any other religion for that matter. Using such things a stick to beat anyone is ignorance and laziness of the highest order.

Sorry what was that, she's an atheist??? Oh right. Well yeah, as I was saying, this video shows how atheists are tasteless, immoral monsters.:pac:

Zombrex · 15-03-2011 01:03PM

JimiTime wrote: »

I really don't get people getting p1ssed off about stuff like this. You think people like this don't exist? What p1sses me off though, is when some bozo thinks that if they find people like this who are genuine, that it somehow undermines Christianity, or any other religion for that matter. Using such things a stick to beat anyone is ignorance and laziness of the highest order.

Sorry what was that, she's an atheist??? Oh right. Well yeah, as I was saying, this video shows how atheists are tasteless, immoral monsters.:pac:

That is the thing. Atheists care less about the idea that atheists are tasteless immoral monsters. Its like 'Meh, are they supposed to not be?' :pac:

MrPudding · 15-03-2011 02:16PM

I would hazard that there are plenty of fundi religious that actually believe the type of thing that she said, and if they could work out how to do it, they would probably post on youtube.

MrP

pts · 15-03-2011 02:34PM

MrPudding wrote: »

I would hazard that there are plenty of fundi religious that actually believe the type of thing that she said, and if they could work out how to do it, they would probably post on youtube.

MrP

Don't worry they don't need YouTube, they've got a large chunk of American media.

Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson on "The 700 Club," September 13, 2001:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-CAcdta_8I

PDN · 15-03-2011 04:30PM

old hippy wrote: »

Religious folk or those who have family in Japan and are not so appreciative of all the humour flying about, currently?

I thought it was funny enough, but it became much more funny when people started taking it seriously.

I can see why it would be distasteful to those with family in Japan, but it would a bit if a stretch to expect anti-Christian internet warriors to be tasteful, wouldn't it?

Morbert · 16-03-2011 01:08AM

We all got Poened.

Overheal · 16-03-2011 03:57AM

loldog wrote: »

Some idiot locked the thread. :mad:

Here, to settle the matter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQfCjuOr1oY

She was a very good troll, very amusing. She seems nice, too bad she'll burn in hell, jk lol.

.

If she pissed off 4chan she wont get away so easily.

They'll find her. And then they'll ruin her life.

s3129 · 16-03-2011 04:04AM

Well I still think shes an idiot, with her annoying little voice.

marty1985 · 16-03-2011 05:06AM

Maybe she's trolling about being a troll. I hate when trolls do that.

smellslikeshoes · 16-03-2011 05:26AM

Overheal wrote: »

If she pissed off 4chan she wont get away so easily.

They'll find her. And then they'll ruin her life.

I was linked a very large thread on 4chan about her before she came clean. When a lot of the internet was talking about if she was legit or not the majority on 4chan had decided and were singing her praises for being an amazing troll. If they didn't want to do anything then when there was still a possibility that she was really like this, I couldn't see them doing anything now.

Seaneh · 16-03-2011 09:55AM

Overheal wrote: »

And then they'll ruin her life.

No they won't.
And anonymous does not = 4Chan.

She'll get some nasty phone calls, some hate mail and that's it... They will forget about her in a few days.

Plowman · 16-03-2011 11:40AM

This post has been deleted.

Fanny Cradock · 16-03-2011 11:47AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29. They are self appointed righter of wrongs. You may have heard of them from recent DDOS attacks.

Seaneh · 16-03-2011 06:59PM

calling them a group is massively flawed... Its not organised... There is no members... It's pretty much just a swarm or people who united for brief periods under the banner. I, for instance was involved with the chanology raid but not many others.
I avoid the pointless crap and the evil stuff. I do support stuff like chanology and anti-censorship raids etc...

Seaneh · 16-03-2011 07:02PM

oh, and its usually 'directed' by a handful of people from certain IRC channels and then they target the Chan's for support. And the masses follow.

I know a few people who have been very close to serving serious time in the U.S., Canada and Europe for their parts in various raids.

I used to have a pretty well rounded interwebs presence.

Cawk n bawllz · 19-03-2011 05:26PM

What's frightening is that its hard to tell the difference between an obvious troll and a geniune fundamentalist. Hmm... bit of a paradox there too.

PDN · 20-03-2011 08:07AM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

What's frightening is that its hard to tell the difference between an obvious troll and a geniune fundamentalist. Hmm... bit of a paradox there too.

What's frightening is that some people are too dumb to spot the difference betweeb an obvious troll and a fundamentalist.

Cawk n bawllz · 20-03-2011 12:02PM

PDN wrote: »

What's frightening is that some people are too dumb to spot the difference betweeb an obvious troll and a fundamentalist.

The Phelps family. Trolls or not?

PDN · 20-03-2011 09:25PM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

The Phelps family. Trolls or not?

No, I don't know of any sane person who thinks they are trolls. They are genuine bona fide fruitcakes.

Doctor DooM · 21-03-2011 09:45AM

PDN wrote: »

No, I don't know of any sane person who thinks they are trolls. They are genuine bona fide fruitcakes.

Ever heard of Nephelimfree on youtube?

There's one guy who's so bizarre I find it hard to believe he's genuine, yet apparent'y he is.

Cawk n bawllz · 21-03-2011 01:47PM

PDN wrote: »

No, I don't know of any sane person who thinks they are trolls. They are genuine bona fide fruitcakes.

And yet they're crazier than that troll girl there.
Now do you see my point about the blurred line between a good troll and a genuine fundamentalist?

Cawk n bawllz · 21-03-2011 01:49PM

Doctor DooM wrote: »

Ever heard of Nephelimfree on youtube?

There's one guy who's so bizarre I find it hard to believe he's genuine, yet apparent'y he is.

Yeah if Nephilimfree is a troll he's really only fooling himself at this point. Though he does wind up the aetheist/scientist community somethin' shockin'!

PDN · 21-03-2011 02:18PM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

And yet they're crazier than that troll girl there.

That's generally the point with genuine fruitcakes. They're crazier than trolls who are just pretending. :rolleyes:

Now do you see my point about the blurred line between a good troll and a genuine fundamentalist?

No, I don't.

Anyone with half a brain could tell that the girl was a troll, that Phelps is a fruitcake, and that neither is a genuine fundamentalist.

Cawk n bawllz · 21-03-2011 07:11PM

PDN wrote: »

That's generally the point with genuine fruitcakes. They're crazier than trolls who are just pretending. :rolleyes:

No, I don't.

Anyone with half a brain could tell that the girl was a troll, that Phelps is a fruitcake, and that neither is a genuine fundamentalist.

She was a troll. Acting like a fundamentalist. The Phelps family are at least as bad as she is Glen Becks is as bad as she is, George Bush and people who actually voted for George Bush are as bad as she is. On youtube, VenomFangX, NephilimFree, Geerup. All as bad as she was.

What's the difference between a fruitcake and a fundamentalist to you?

PDN · 21-03-2011 07:23PM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

She was a troll. Acting like a fundamentalist. The Phelps family are at least as bad as she is Glen Becks is as bad as she is, George Bush and people who actually voted for George Bush are as bad as she is. On youtube, VenomFangX, NephilimFree, Geerup. All as bad as she was.

I see - a large proportion of adults in the US are "as bad as she is". :rolleyes:

What's the difference between a fruitcake and a fundamentalist to you?

A fundamentalist is someone who believes in five fundamental Christian truths: the inspiration of the Bible by the Holy Spirit. the virgin birth of Christ, Christ's atoning death, the bodily resurrection of Christ, and the historical reality of Christ's miracles. That's how the term was coined.

Cawk n bawllz · 21-03-2011 07:44PM

PDN wrote: »

I see - a large proportion of adults in the US are "as bad as she is". :rolleyes:

A fundamentalist is someone who believes in five fundamental Christian truths: the inspiration of the Bible by the Holy Spirit. the virgin birth of Christ, Christ's atoning death, the bodily resurrection of Christ, and the historical reality of Christ's miracles. That's how the term was coined.

Okay, so that's a fundamentalist to you.
And you mentioned the Phelps family as "fruitcakes". What's a fruitcake to you in that context?

Fanny Cradock · 21-03-2011 08:08PM

Allow me to clarify. A fruitcake is a nutjob :pac:

sponsoredwalk · 22-03-2011 09:41PM

I think I'm in love with this girl!

"I've been making troll videos for a while now..."

Can't believe anybody in the atheist forum fell for this one

Cawk n bawllz · 24-03-2011 02:42AM

I've been beating around the bush presenting statements as questions.
Fundamentalists are complete nutjobs. No matter how crazy troll girl could have acted she still wouldn't stand out as a troll because fundamentalists are actually worse than her.
Any fundies in here? You're the laughing stock of the planet.

The Mad Hatter · 24-03-2011 03:05AM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

I've been beating around the bush presenting statements as questions.
Fundamentalists are complete nutjobs. No matter how crazy troll girl could have acted she still wouldn't stand out as a troll because fundamentalists are actually worse than her.
Any fundies in here? You're the laughing stock of the planet.

Here's a link to a fundamentalist Christian thread on how to recognise homosexuals.

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=60892

Now I'm beginning to think you're a troll. The Landover Baptist Church is a well-known satire site.

Cawk n bawllz · 24-03-2011 03:18AM

The Mad Hatter wrote: »

Now I'm beginning to think you're a troll. The Landover Baptist Church is a well-known satire site.

Sorry, sir, but you can't just call people with opposing views to yours trolls and you can't just try to combat free speech by pointing the finger at someone and calling them a troll.
It's not how civilized discussion works.

The Mad Hatter · 24-03-2011 03:25AM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

Sorry, sir, but you can't just call people with opposing views to yours trolls and you can't just try to combat free speech by pointing the finger at someone and calling them a troll.
It's not how civilized discussion works.

What opposing opinion to you do you think I have?

PDN · 24-03-2011 08:58AM

The Mad Hatter wrote: »

What opposing opinion to you do you think I have?

You are of the opinion that satiirical parodies are distinct from reality.

Therefore you recognise that Landover Baptist is not a real church.

PDN · 24-03-2011 10:36AM

Cawk n bawllz wrote: »

Sorry, sir, but you can't just call people with opposing views to yours trolls and you can't just try to combat free speech by pointing the finger at someone and calling them a troll.
It's not how civilized discussion works.

I think he was being rather kind in calling you a troll. The alternative would have been to insult your intelligence by implying that you are genuinely unable to recognise that the Landover Baptist thing is a parody.

Turtwig · 24-03-2011 10:57AM

Didn't stop Thunderf00t making a video about it. Love how, he focuses on the utters extremes of religion.

I like to think I always suspected her as being an imposter but to be honest I still expect folks like Pat Robertson to come clean about some of their statements. I guess I have too much faith in my fellow homo sapiens.

sponsoredwalk · 24-03-2011 11:55AM

PDN wrote: »

I think he was being rather kind in calling you a troll. The alternative would have been to insult your intelligence by implying that you are genuinely unable to recognise that the Landover Baptist thing is a parody.

I think this is a pretty unfair dichotomy you've set up PDN. Just because
CnB hasn't read that website X is satirical does not mean that because
he lacks this information his intelligence is demeaned in any way.

So either he was trolling because he picked a classic example of satiri-mentalists
or he genuinely didn't know it was fake (which doesn't invalidate the point
he was making about fundamentalists {no matter what meaning you attribute to that
word }). Nobodies intelligence is being insulted here - except possibly
ours by reading some troll using a fake website to stir up trouble in
this thread (which I highly doubt was the case btw).

old hippy · 24-03-2011 12:21PM

PDN wrote: »

What's frightening is that some people are too dumb to spot the difference betweeb an obvious troll and a fundamentalist.

Because some are subtle and the differences are marginal?

I remember when Peter O'Toole read from Swift's Modest Proposal, around the time of the Ethiopian famine. He incurred boos from the audience (at the Gaiety?) who missed the satire and reacted angrily to the idea of eating the poor. But I digress.

gbee · 24-03-2011 12:30PM

georgieporgy wrote: »

Do we all assume she was/is an atheist then?;)

Have you seen her on other sites. She is a therapist in human behaviour both spiritual and physical.

She discusses various religions as well as relationships. I've not looked for a link and won't be, but I've seen this video a long time ago. I don't know the time scale, she looks much younger in the above vid though.

Confirmed: Crazy religious girl is a troll

Comments