Irish International Debt

musho

I would like to know if article 27 which more or less says (the country can vote on anything which effects the

country) would help to give the people a vote and see if they want to bail the bankers out. I want organise a protest

against it? Could you also tell me why the fina Geal are just interested in a reduction in intrest and why they have

to decided to except to pay this as the money was not there in the first place. By law i think this is an invalid load?

Its been said it would take 163 tax payments to pay the debt and why is than not a better option than helping the

bankers ,who are gone bust. Like in any business if they go bust thats there problem. They knew they were trading

recklessly and the law says thats criminal(hard solvincey), yet there helping them to stay in business. Also I cant

understand why Lobour & Fina Geal are in together as in the next election there will be no one with a large vote to

vote for. But about article 27 can you please help me out on some facts to put some form of protest together any if

you have the time any additional information about my concerns would be great, bur mainly just to protest for a

vote by means of article 27. please contant me by my own email as well if your interested in helping logsburn161

at hotmail dot com Thank you, John PS fina gael webs site says each person owes 21 thousand 97bn total.

musho

musho wrote: »

I would like to know if article 27 which more or less says (the country can vote on anything which effects the

country) would help to give the people a vote and see if they want to bail the bankers out. I want organise a protest

against it? Could you also tell me why the fina Geal are just interested in a reduction in intrest and why they have

to decided to except to pay this as the money was not there in the first place. By law i think this is an invalid load?

Its been said it would take 163 tax payments to pay the debt and why is than not a better option than helping the

bankers ,who are gone bust. Like in any business if they go bust thats there problem. They knew they were trading

recklessly and the law says thats criminal(hard solvincey), yet there helping them to stay in business. Also I cant

understand why Lobour & Fina Geal are in together as in the next election there will be no one with a large vote to

vote for. But about article 27 can you please help me out on some facts to put some form of protest together any if

you have the time any additional information about my concerns would be great, bur mainly just to protest for a

vote by means of article 27. please contant me by my own email as well if your interested in helping logsburn161

at hotmail dot com Thank you, John PS fina gael webs site says each person owes 21 thousand 97bn total.

That is the weirdest formatting I have ever seen....

Rasmus

Did you type this in microsoft word first in double line spacing?

melekalikimaka

i think you need to address your ability to articulate, your spelling, and the reasoning behind your post, also look into the reasons why the banks were bailed out.

musho

(articulate) ok, (your spelling) ok, (the reasoning behind your post), give me a bit of feedback as to what you think, (also look into the reasons why the banks were bailed out) I dont think that the issue what i saying is why should you me or anyone have to pay for a the banks bad choices. Get back again please

Scofflaw

Incomprehensible (and duplicate) thread is incomprehensible (and duplicate). OP can PM me to clarify what they're trying to ask.

moderately,
Scofflaw