Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rooney could be charged by the FA!

  • 28-02-2011 11:22am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,174 ✭✭✭


    Reports today in the media say rooney could be charged by the FA for saturdays incident when he elbowed James McCarthy.
    He should get banned for the more than the 3 games as a minimum as it was disgraceful behaviour imo!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,625 ✭✭✭✭Johner


    Colinboy wrote: »
    Reports today in the media say rooney could be charged by the FA for saturdays incident when he elbowed James McCarthy.
    He should get banned for the more than the 3 games as a minimum as it was disgraceful behaviour imo!

    Going by the rules nothing should be done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,838 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Colinboy wrote: »
    Reports today in the media say rooney could be charged by the FA for saturdays incident when he elbowed James McCarthy.
    He should get banned for the more than the 3 games as a minimum as it was disgraceful behaviour imo!

    Really?

    The Match Thread or the United thread were not enough?

    No way Rooney should get a ban at this point.

    He should have got a red card in the game, but the ref saw the incident and gave a free kick. It was dealt with by the official during the game, so the FA could only ban him as an exceptional case - and if they didn't feel Javier Mascherano (vs Leeds) or Gerrard (on Welbeck and on Brown) deserved special punishment there is no way that Rooney should be singled out.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    Johner wrote: »
    Going by the rules nothing should be done.

    If the rules say nothing should be done, the rules are wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,838 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Johner wrote: »
    Going by the rules nothing should be done.

    Bet you are hoping nothing happens. if it does the formless gormless idiot will likely be our main attacking 'threat' vs your lot tomorrow!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,625 ✭✭✭✭Johner


    karma_ wrote: »
    If the rules say nothing should be done, the rules are wrong.

    The ref saw it and dealt with it, it should be the end of the matter. I'm not saying it's right but thats the way it is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    Colinboy wrote: »
    He should get banned for the more than the 3 games as a minimum as it was disgraceful behaviour imo!

    Er...why? If he had been sent off he would be serving a three-game ban, same as any other violent conduct offence.

    From memory, this would be the first retrospective banning that had been acknowledged by a referee since Ben Thatcher on Pedro Mendes wouldn't it? Though I loathe to bring that in because there is no comparison between the two incidents.

    There have been far, far worse incidents that the FA have been 'helpless' to act on because it was dealt with by the match officials. It's either okay to over-rule a referee decision retrospectively or it's not.

    Still, it was ridiculously stupid from Rooney.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    sure its just a media witch hunt :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,174 ✭✭✭Sergio


    Johner wrote: »
    Going by the rules nothing should be done.

    What rule is that my friend???????Just because the ref didnt see it and he only got a yellow card.The FA have often charged players after games from looking at video evidence.
    Heres a link to the video.Make sure you wear glasses!:rolleyes:

    http://soccer-portal.org/video/5838-rooney-elbow-mccarthy-wigan.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,625 ✭✭✭✭Johner


    Bet you are hoping nothing happens. if it does the formless gormless idiot will likely be our main attacking 'threat' vs your lot tomorrow!

    Yeah I'd be alot more worried if I saw Hernandez/Berbatov lininig up against us tomorrow on current form!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,838 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Colinboy wrote: »
    What rule is that my friend???????Just because the ref didnt see it and he only got a yellow card.The FA have often charged players after games from looking at video evidence.
    Heres a link to the video.Make sure you wear glasses!:rolleyes:

    http://soccer-portal.org/video/5838-rooney-elbow-mccarthy-wigan.html

    What are you talking about? The ref DID see it. A foul was called and a free given.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement