€750m to unguaranteed bondholders 2 weeks ago...anyone?

Rebelbrowser

This emerged on Vincent Browne last night. I have pasted below a transcript of what was said (thanks to Braodsheet.ie). Anyone know more about this? Sounds like the last, outrageous act of a corrupt regime or is there another explanation?



"Last night’s Tonight with Vincent Browne was a classic. And the highlight was an exchange between the host and Fianna Fail deputy leader Mary Hanafin.

It concerned the €750 million payout earlier this month to bondholders who were not covered by the bank guarantee. Why was the money paid when it wasn’t necessary? To put this into context the amount of money saved by social service cuts in November’s budget was around €800 million.

The obvious question now is who got the money? Best not ask Mary though.

Mary Hanafin: “What happened in Anglo was appalling. It is absolutely disgraceful and I think we would all agree on that.”

Vincent Browne: “Mary, can I just ask you one question? Can I just ask you one question? Why did your government, of which you are a member, two weeks ago pay €750m to bondholders in Anglo Irish Bank who were no longer covered by the guarantee? Why did it do that?”

Hanafin: “Because that was the agreement that was reached.”

Browne: “That is not part of the, that is not part… I’m sorry, Mary. That is not part of the agreement entered into with the EU and IMF.”

Hanafin: “Yeah, no, but it was part of the guarantee that was given.”

Browne: “I’m very sorry, Mary. It was out of guarantee. Now why did you pay €750m to bondholders in Anglo Irish Bank who were not covered by the guarantee? Why did you do that?”

Hanafin: “Because the bondholders around, the senior bondholders around the banks, are people who were given a guarantee at the time two years ago. Those bondholders also include pension funds, they include credit unions, they include ordinary Irish people and their money, and that money had to be protected.”

Browne: “Mary…”

Hanafin: “And the reason we gave that guarantee at the time – and this is important because people are saying we shouldn’t have done it.”

Browne: “We’re not talking about the guarantee.”

Hanafin: “The governor of the Central Bank even says it is a systemic bank and should be guaranteed.”

Browne: “Mary, this is nothing to do with it. Nothing to do with it. I’ll ask the question again.”

Hanafin: “Yeah.”

Browne: “Why did you pay €750m to bondholders who are not covered by the guarantee? And you did that two or three weeks ago at a time when you’re cutting social welfare, you’re devastating the lives of people on the margins, you pay €750m to these people not covered by any guarantee.”

Hanafin: “Well we have obligations to the bondholders because…”

Browne: “What obligations did you have to the bondholders?”

Hanafin: “Because of the agreement that we made two years ago.”

Browne: “Mary -”

Hanafin: “The subordinated bondholders have already lost significantly…”

Browne: “Mary you’re not, you’re not.”

Hanafin: “To the tune of €10bn.”

Browne: “There is no obligation to the bondholders. Zero. Zero obligation to the bondholders. None at all. No moral, no legal, no obligation at all to the bondholders. Why at a time when you’re cutting social welfare did you pay €750m to these people?”

Hanafin: “I know you want to talk about cutting social welfare which was a very different thing to do as well and we accept that, but if you’re going to bridge the gap between what the government is taking in and what we’re spending, unfortunately that’s what had to be done.”

Browne: “You had to pay €750m to bondholders not covered by the guarantee.”

Hanafin. “No, no. I’m picking up on the point of the about social welfare. No, but it was part of the agreement and it had to be done and we had to honour that agreement.”

Browne: “What agreement? Mary you’re not, you’re not… We agreed to guarantee certain bondholders and depositors in the banks and some of those guarantees expired and there was no longer a legal or moral obligation to pay them anything. and … you still paid €750m in the last two weeks.”

Hanafin: “Yes, well, bit longer I think.”

Browne: Incredible isn’t it?

Hanafin: “It is a lot of money and I accept that but this is part of our obligations.”

Browne: “Where? What obligations?”

Hanafin: “To support the Irish banking system.”

Browne: “It’s nothing to do with the Irish banking system.”

Hanafin: “And to ensure that we can always go back then. The money we’re borrowing internationally, for example, we have to be able to continue to be able to go back, to make sure.”

Joan Burton: “But we’re not borrowing internationally. We’re out of the markets. That’s the whole point. We’re out of the markets. We’re not borrowing. That’s why you can deal with the bondholders.”

Hanafin: “But we have to make sure that when we do go back to the markets, which of course is our aim, and to be able to do it fairly quickly, is that we will be able to do that.”

Browne: “Sure they’ll think us crazy.”

Hanafin: Well they’ll certainly think us crazy if we don’t honour our debts

Browne: “But these are not our debts. They’re not our debts Mary. THEY ARE NOT OUR DEBTS! These are the debts of Anglo Irish Bank. We gave a guarantee, the guarantee expired. No longer do we have any obligation and yet we paid. Why?”

Hanafin: “Yeah. Because we gave commitments and we gave a guarantee, and we have to honour that.”

Browne: [high-pitched sound]

Hanafin: “And we do expect to go back to the markets and we do expect to be able to compete in those markets the same as everybody else and to make our way

Browne: “Very thin, very thin explanation. A very, very thin explanation Mary, very thin…”

ei.sdraob

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056163131

Rebelbrowser

thanks. More of it.

jmayo

I notice haffin resorted to the same argument that nmehole did the other night about paying off Irish pension funds and Credit Unions.

Just to put this to bed, does anyone have any idea how much have Irish pension funds and the Credit Unions tied up in the likes of Anglo and INBS ?

I remember hearing figure of 80 to 90 million for the Credit Unions ?

paul71

jmayo wrote: »

I notice haffin resorted to the same argument that nmehole did the other night about paying off Irish pension funds and Credit Unions.

Just to put this to bed, does anyone have any idea how much have Irish pension funds and the Credit Unions tied up in the likes of Anglo and INBS ?

I remember hearing figure of 80 to 90 million for the Credit Unions ?

And the Credit Unions have a depositers Guarentee.

Liam Byrne

Mary has obviously never bought anything in her life and had to ring them after the guarantee expired.

Having watched the video of last night, it has me seriously worried. No-one - ABSOLUTELY NO-ONE - can be as thick as Mary Hanafin came across last night on the concept that an expired guarantee is worth nothing, and you have no obligation once it does.

So the only plausible explanation is that they are covering something else up that they don't want us to know, and so losing all credibility is the lesser of two evils.

It's not a conspiracy theory - it's the only logical conclusion of someone brazening it out by openly lying that we had "commitments because of the [expired] guarantee".

jimmycrackcorm

I thought the banking guarantee had been extended? In once sense though Browne was stoking it by asking Hanafin for the answer as the correct person to ask would have been the minister for finance. I'm pretty sure that VB knew that she wouldn't have an answer for it.

We do need a rationale about this payment because it demonstrates that we either don't have a clear policy on what we are doing regarding the financial process or that there is no-one in charge at all, who would have stood up and said - hang on, maybe we don't need to pay this out.....