Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Unknown (2011)

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,254 ✭✭✭Esse85


    Anyone looking forward to seeing this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,020 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Esse85 wrote: »
    Anyone looking forward to seeing this?

    I enjoyed Taken so will try and see this also


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭norrie rugger


    Liam Neeson really entertained in "Taken". He can just pull off menace, with that voice and him being 6'4".

    I have been looking forward to this for a while now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 821 ✭✭✭temply


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    I enjoyed Taken so will try and see this also


    Seen both - its not as good as Taken, but its certainly watchable

    3 out of 5 - average


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,693 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    The plot is as old as the hills and it took me about 30 minutes to guess the twist and another 30 to predict exactly how it was going to end, but I still enjoyed it. I think I preferred it to Taken. This is more of an old style suspense thriller than an action movie, but there are some very effective action scenes. Very entertaining all round.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭✭Skerries


    yeah i had the thing figured out fairly quickly as well, i think we are just desenitised to twist endings these days thats why i preferred Takens all out action

    anyone else notice the "OZ" graffitti everywhere in the film, i counted it 6 times
    other people have noticed as well
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110218191015AATr3NI


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,634 ✭✭✭✭Richard Dower


    temply wrote: »
    Seen both - its not as good as Taken, but its certainly watchable

    3 out of 5 - average

    Agree, no way as good as Taken but i think it's not supposed to be Taken 2.0, it has more story and character development then Taken, i'm not say the story is great or rivetiting, but at least it did have an actual story which was lacking in action-fest Taken.

    It reminded me of that 1987 movie witf Harrison Ford Frantic, but not as good. It's an OK watch, Berlin in the snow was interesting, an average movie but you could do worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭Johnny Derpp


    Finally caught this last night and that it was ****e. Utter ****e.
    And I've excused Nesson for what he did in Taken but this is just unforgiveable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭Captain Darling


    Finally caught this last night and that it was ****e. Utter ****e.
    And I've excused Nesson for what he did in Taken but this is just unforgiveable.

    I thought Taken was poor too, going to avoid this like the plague then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    Didn't think it was that bad.
    Defo wasn't hugely impressed but it was good for a popcorn flick.

    Can't believe you didn't like Taken though!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement