Ask The Candidate - Sheila Cahill, Green Party, Limerick City

Sheila Cahill

Hi all,

I'm standing for the Dáil representing the Green Party in Limerick City.

I'm a small business owner and my background is in improving the governance of community and voluntary organisations. I'm campaigning on a platform of clean politics, a real economy and a better Limerick. You can find out more about me and my policies at http://limerickvotegreen.com

If you would like to ask me any questions about me and my policies please do so here. It's a bit hectic a week out from the election but I'll try and check back every day or two and do my best to answer your questions.

Hopefully we can have a civil and constructive debate, it would be great if all candidates used avenues like this to connect with voters.

Thanks,

Sheila.

Stuffy

Why are you standing for the Green Party and are you fully supportive of their policies?

Surely it would have been better to campaign as an independent where your reputation wouldn't be tarnished by standing with a party that could very well be obliterated.

I would usually be open to listening to any candidates policies but your position in campaigning under the Green Party banner has left me the option of not considering you for election.

I wish you all the best in your personal career, but on your basis of standing with the Green Party I can't wish anything other than failure.

Stuffy

TheInquisitor

What kind of business are you in?

Jumpy

Oddly enough. I thought I posted, but I guess it didnt. Have you emailed Dav to ask permission to do this?

Liam Byrne

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

I'm standing for the Dáil representing the Green Party in Limerick City.

Your party helped foist NAMA and a blanket bank guarantee on us, and is also abandoning its polluter pays principle in order to add stealth taxes to law-abiding and conscientious citizens of this state.

So not a hope in hell.

If you choose to run as an independent, get back to me.

billy the squid

Jumpy wrote: »

Oddly enough. I thought I posted, but I guess it didnt. Have you emailed Dav to ask permission to do this?

This has the blessing of the Admins.

Koyasan

First, please ignore the people who conveniently forget:
1) about FG's backing of the Bank Guarantee,
2) the fact that fluctuations in the price of oil are what have caused the vast majority of the increase in the cost of fuel and that carbon taxes are designed to reduce our dependence on such fuels and therefore our exposure to such fluctuations.
3) that FF has enough TDs to form a government in 2007 without the Greens and that Enda Kenny vetoed down the only other alternative.

Second, thank you for actually engaging with us and being willing to answer questions. I realise that the Greens have some good national plans and that there is great hope for employment in Green tech in Belmullet and other locations. But what about Limerick? To be blunt, what difference would having a load of Greens in the Dail do for unemployment in Limerick?

knockon

As well as the GP appaling record in the insolvency of the State something else you guys were more preoccupied with.....

John Gormley, Green Party Chairman, statement to the Irish Anti War Movement Press conference (Tuesday May 22nd 2007) "Our election manifesto states unequivocally: *End the use of Shannon Airport by US military forces involved in the war in Iraq"

You seemed to have suceeded.....

"Shannon airport had the worst decline in the 300-airport survey - dipping 37.2% in 2010 compared with 2009."

Maybe if your party spent as much time worring about the welfare of your own constitutents as you obviously do about Citizens other Countries you may have had some chance. Also the 5 individuals ( a few GP Members in there) who put pick axes into a B737 at Shannon belonging to the US Government in 2006 cost the State €2.5M + in damages - I wonder how many people this would this money give a Carers Allowance to? A lot of people who were employed in Shannon thanks to this Transit traffic. Something that seemed lost on the GP.

Patricia Forde Brennan got 190 Numer 1's approx in 2007 - I would'nt expect any GP candidate in Limerick City to achieve more that 70 First Preferences.

R.I.P G.P.

Raiser

flutered wrote: »

koyasan, the carbon tax will never reduce our dependance on fossil fuels, it is a stealth tax.

@ Koyosan's argument - What a dull clang is made when aimless idealism meets ill informed ignorance.

Here we suffer on daily in this beleagured State with a low density, micro population that would fit in a Matchbox in terms of Global scales/population density and yet we still are unfortunate enough to suffer a carbon tax so that our Green Party co-citizens can progress from being the classroom window-licker to Star of the 2010 Oslo Conference on Climate Arse Buggery.

"Delegates my name is John Gormley and let me assure you that as Fianna Fail line their own pockets and bankrupt the Irish State we are building Lego Windmills and training Stags to ride Scooters"

Before tax a litre of petrol is (someone help out please - perhaps 60 cents?) I know I have no LUAS, Underground rail, or even bus service to use as an alternative seeing as the Greens presided over massive cuts to our public transport system. Do they expect me to pay €2 per litre for petrol to save 12 Penguins or else quit my job? What a sickening, stunted, warped, childish, Ill conceived and ridiculous notion to have gotten away with - which they have - so far......

Sheila I hold you and yours in the same bracket as any other anti social element in my life - The Green Party experience is akin to waking up to a smashed front door, stolen car, mugged family member etc. Your Friends are stealing from us and profiting from our misery and enough is enough.

The difference between FF and the Greens is that in 2007 inbred Ireland voted FF thinking they were crooked but good for yours truly but the Greens don't even have the decency of the common criminal that steals out of misfortune and lean times, no the Greens steal because it's their hobby and a nice distraction in between the Hunt Ball and the Chelsea flower show.

How dare they and what possessed you?

padma

A few years back the green party got a vote off me. This was when I believed jobs would be created through initiatives and bringing us on par with Germany's reputation as an efficient recycling nation. 3 years in to your power sharing with Fianna Fail saw your party having a go at the working class and the poor of this whole country.

What madness drove you to becoming a far right capitalist money hungry grabbing party. What lunacy drove you all to bankrupting the country, agreeing with your masters in the bank. Is Government to represent the masses or to represent the elite? Why didn't ye have the cop on to stand up for us? Why did you turn your back on Limerick? Why did you turn your backs on the whole Island and leave us as slaves to the IMF. In the green party's case sadly your time in Government was spent giving two fingers up to the normal decent working people of this island.

You may receive votes from the ones the recession hasn't hit, but here in Limerick the ones who have been hit are the majority and I seriously urge the good hard working "unemployed" people of this city to return the two fingers to those who pushed you out of your jobs and left you in the lurch.

Having a decent job nowadays is the envy of your friends, relations, and aqcuaintances, how sad, how very sad to see a generation cast aside because those in power lapped up massive wages and drove around in chauffeur driven mercs.

I have worked in the developing world where corruption was the norm, but corruption there was tiny compared to the corruption which beggared this once prosperous island of ours.

So if you want me to ask a question it would simply be, what empty promises, what favours are you going to grant the poor? Why do you want to be in power? do you want to control others with what you think is the way we should be? And finally, what can your small tiny party possibly acheive in government apart from taxing us to the hilt?

phog

I'm not sure what way to vote, I've never given a No1 to a Green candidate but I support with some of their policies.
For me, the fact that they supported FF has very little baring in how they should be seen in the this election, the small party in any coalition will always suffer at the hands of the big bad wolf. IMHO, the one topic thay made a stand on was a stupid one - stag hunting, while our health service falls back about 10 years.

The fear I have is that the stealth taxes being imposed by Green policy is costing me way too much and I cant see how I can steer myself away from these and it's mainly around energy - electricity, heating and transport. All of these not only hit me as an individual but also as a consumer.

osarusan

Hi Sheila.

First of all, fair play to you for looking to communicate with your constituents in this way - you're the only Limerick city candidate who has done so. It takes a bit of courage for any politician to take this approach, as there is much less control of the electorate's response than a lot of other ways of canvassing (as is obvious from most of the posts so far).

I have a few questions for you.

First of all, it seems to me that after being in government for 3 and a bit yeats, the current image of the Green party is one which betrayed its principles to get into government, and people are no longer sure what, if anything, the party stands for. Do you agree that this is a common perception of the party, and if you do agree, what is the party / should the party be doing to remedy this?

Secondly, we hear a lot about how we all benefitted from the good times, so we all have to share the pain. This is a very general statement, and brushes under the carpet the fact that there are plenty of people who never really benefitted from the bubble economy. I want to ask you how you justify your party's position that everybody in Ireland has to pay off the debt generated by the decisions of other people, who are in many cases the kind of bondholders -the only people guaranteed not to lose out?

Thirdly, it is clear that the government's position is that in the event of a bank being unable to repay its debts, the government is obliged to step in and take on those debts. Given that this is the case, how do you account for the almost total lack of regulation of the banks by the body which had to assume all debts banks generate? In what way, if any, did the Green party push for greater regulation of the banks?

Although I think the odds are very much stacked against you, I wish you luck in the election.

Sheila Cahill

I've tried to answer some of your questions below. Thanks to all who responded. I will check back Sunday or Monday and answer some more questions, if they are asked.

Sheila.

Why are you standing for the Green Party and are you fully supportive of their policies?

I'm standing because I don't believe that TDs should be voted in based on what side someone's grandfather fought in the Civil War, how many potholes they get fixed or passport applications they help submit, or how many big businesses have donated to their political campaigns. I believe that the Green Party policy platform is one that can build a fair and sustainable Ireland.

What kind of business are you in?

I run a small business providing training and consultancy, mostly in the area of governance, to community and voluntary organisations. I've put more information on my Tell me Why profile which you might be interested in: http://www.telluswhy.ie/limerick-city/sheila-cahill/

What difference would having a load of Greens in the Dail do for unemployment in Limerick?

A small example of the kind of employment that can be generated in Limerick is Southill Community Services. Under the Warmer Homes Scheme they provide insulation and energy-efficiency measures to homes in Co. Limerick, East Co. Clare, North Co. Tipperary and South Co. Offaly to low-income households under the Warmer Homes Scheme. I don't have the current number of people employed under this scheme in Southill to hand, but it's a real example of the kind of "Green Jobs" that can deliver for Limerick.

I also think that the party's proposal to train 20,000 unemployed people to work with 100,000 Irish businesses to help them sell their products and services online is a policy that would bring benefits to Limerick.

Finally, Limerick's position on the western seaboard and our access to road and rail links, as well as our access to talented graduates, would make it an ideal location for a green technology hub. Our geographical position makes us an ideal place for timber processing, sustainable food processing and creative services. We could play to those strengths.

First of all, it seems to me that after being in government for 3 and a bit yeats, the current image of the Green party is one which betrayed its principles to get into government, and people are no longer sure what, if anything, the party stands for. Do you agree that this is a common perception of the party, and if you do agree, what is the party / should the party be doing to remedy this?

I'm sure people do hold that view, I'm not sure it's widespread.

42% of people voted in 2007 for Bertie Ahern as Taoiseach. Nobody was more unhappy about this result than me and my colleagues in the Party. Fianna Fail were, after all, the party that was the worst culprit (with Fine Gael a close runner-up) in corrupt re-zonings and the cosy relationship between business and politics. It was a Fianna Fail councillor, after all, who physically assaulted Trevor Sargent when he tried to ask about donations from property developers in Dublin City Council.

I say all this because we will go into government with any party who will help us implement our policies. That's not because we're unprincipled, but because we respect the constitutional right of the people to say what parties they prefer to have in government through a general election.

To be honest, I don't think that what the party stands for has changed at all. In a nutshell, we're about solutions for the long-term future of this country, and better leadership to get there.

I want to ask you how you justify your party's position that everybody in Ireland has to pay off the debt generated by the decisions of other people, who are in many cases the kind of bondholders -the only people guaranteed not to lose out?

I can see how your argument is attractive, but Ireland simply cannot unilaterally force senior bondholders to share the burden of our bank debt. Bad enough as the consequences for the euro would be, the consequences for the Irish economy would be greater because the funding that we currently need from outside to run our banks and public services would dry up.

Given that this is the case, how do you account for the almost total lack of regulation of the banks by the body which had to assume all debts banks generate? In what way, if any, did the Green party push for greater regulation of the banks?

There's an important point in the banking crisis which I think has been missed. The seeds of the banking crisis were sown well before 2007. I agree that there was not enough regulation of the banks. I assume that's why the banks donated money to the election campaigns of Labour, Fine Gael and Fianna Fail - certainly the cosy relationship between politics and the banks contributed to the "light touch" regulatory environment.

What did we do? Without the Green Party we wouldn't have got the first ever independent governor of the Central Bank. We wouldn't have got Matthew Elderfield appointed as Financial Regulator. We have brought an independence into the oversight of the banking system which will help prevent this sort of crisis from ever happening again. And if we had got our corporate donations bill through the Dáil, we would have prevented the banks from ever trying to influence the political system through donations again.


Finally, a few brief points on the carbon tax: firstly all the main parties support retention of the carbon levy, secondly it currently only represents about 4c on the price of a litre of fuel, and thirdly it makes sense to tax something that is undesirable for society (carbon emissions) rather than something that is desirable for society (work, i.e. income tax). If you took away the carbon levy (and again I must point out that no other mainstream political party supports this), you would just have to raise it from other tax sources.

cullen5998

At least she answered a few questions anyway.

All the unemployed in Limerick will work at insulating houses, maybe in the ghost estates to keep the mice warm next winter:)

Stuffy

In fairness she answered a few questions, but she seems as clueless as any other Green Party members I have encountered.

And to think it isn't a widespread view that the Green Party deceived the people is laughable, she will know all about it in a few weeks.

Thank Christ they will be gone in a few weeks so we won't have to listen to junk about insulating houses when the county has thousands unemployed.

Dumdum McCarthy

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

Finally, a few brief points on the carbon tax: firstly all the main parties support retention of the carbon levy, secondly it currently only represents about 4c on the price of a litre of fuel, and thirdly it makes sense to tax something that is undesirable for society (carbon emissions) rather than something that is desirable for society (work, i.e. income tax). If you took away the carbon levy (and again I must point out that no other mainstream political party supports this), you would just have to raise it from other tax sources.

On your bike Sheila just like your Leader!

Insect Overlord

Dumdum McCarthy wrote: »

On your bike Sheila just like your Leader!

A bit more maturity, please. I'm sure you'd expect the same if you were to post here under your real name.

phog

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

Finally, Limerick's position on the western seaboard and our access to road and rail links, as well as our access to talented graduates, would make it an ideal location for a green technology hub. Our geographical position makes us an ideal place for timber processing, sustainable food processing and creative services. We could play to those strengths.


Finally, a few brief points on the carbon tax: firstly all the main parties support retention of the carbon levy, secondly it currently only represents about 4c on the price of a litre of fuel, and thirdly it makes sense to tax something that is undesirable for society (carbon emissions) rather than something that is desirable for society (work, i.e. income tax). If you took away the carbon levy (and again I must point out that no other mainstream political party supports this), you would just have to raise it from other tax sources.

Our exports are about our only success at moment and you state the carbon tax adds 4c a litre on our transport cost. What additional cost is this having on our cost effectivness? Your point about Limerick is welcome but why would anyone set up on the west coast with the cost of transport?

limerick_woody

I would have real sympathy with Green politics and prior to your time in Government would have voted green. However, your party enabled the destruction of an entire Irish generation's hopes and dreams. I can never vote for your party again - ever, I hope your party is utterly destroyed in the election.

Itsdacraic

Your party has very strongly links with lunatic extremist groups such as ICABS. Do you support such militant groups?

panda100

Just looked at the Boards GE election poll, and Willie O'Dea is still getting a large portion of the vote
What are people thinking really? I was on FAS this morning and all the jobs were working for the dole. Full time jobs for qualified teachers and nurses, all for 200 quid a week.
I'm a fully qualified disability support worker, and been working in the field for the last 5 years with masses of experience, and I'm expected to work for 7.65 an hour now. I would f*cking love to see Willie O'Dea work a full days hard work with me and feel satisfied taking home €60 at the end of it.That barely covers my petrol!
I did calculations last night and Mary Harney's once off bonus payment for leaving the dail is that same as what I earn in 15 years, and that was even during the 'good' times!The Greens did nothing to stop the demise of this country and presided in facilitating the gross inequality between rich and poor.

I have nobody to vote for in West Limerick as FG and Labour are the exact same as FF. I wish I had transferred my vote to Limerick city and I would definitely be voting for Cian Prendivelle and the United Left Alliance. I feel nothing but disenfranchised during this election, and despite being a bright,intelligent hard worker, I see no future in this country for me If FG get in, and will be booking a one way ticket out of here.

Sheila Cahill

What additional cost is this having on our cost effectivness? Your point about Limerick is welcome but why would anyone set up on the west coast with the cost of transport?

By my calculations, current carbon tax on petrol is less than 3% of total cost.

Current fuel costs in Ireland are actually pretty average compared with other Western European countries - see http://www.aaireland.ie/AA/Motoring-advice/Petrol-Prices.aspx

Finally, it will be a strategic competitive advantage for Ireland to be less reliant on oil. We should be harnessing the wind and wave resources that we have for our energy needs, rather than importing oil from unstable Arab countries.

Your party has very strongly links with lunatic extremist groups such as ICABS. Do you support such militant groups?

I am not a member of the Irish Council Against Blood Sports. I am opposed to sports that pit one animal against another, but I wouldn't consider it a core part of my policy platform or my political views.

I would never support violent action against people or animals to pursue political aims. As far as I know the ICABS do not advocate violent means of protest. I think that categorising them as "lunatic extremist" and "militant" is inaccurate.

Yes, a few people in the Green Party are involved in (peacefully) campaigning against blood sports. Probably more in Co. Limerick than in urban areas, as we have quite a lot of farmers who are members of the party who hate having the hunts trespass over their land. But there are far more Green Party members who are involved in actively campaigning against bad planning, or for better public transport, or for political reform.


These were the only two follow up questions that I could see, and this thread seems to have turned into a more general political discussion, so I think I will leave it there. It was an interesting experiment, although perhaps it could have been a more constructive discussion. Thanks to all who asked questions, and hopefully you got some answers to your queries.

If anyone would like to email me with any other questions you can do so to sheila@limerickvotegreen.com and I'll do my best to respond before the vote on Friday.

Thanks,

Sheila.

Stuffy

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

I would never support violent action against people or animals to pursue political aims. As far as I know the ICABS do not advocate violent means of protest. I think that categorising them as "lunatic extremist" and "militant" is inaccurate.

I have personally seen surveillance of people killing a hare and then attempting to video/photograph the dead animal (they didn't get that far), to protest against coursing. I was there when these people were caught, I'm not involved in the sport I was aiding a neighbour who said there was intruders on his land, and upon investigation they had an affiliation with the ICABS.

I'm not suggesting this was condoned by the ICABS and I know you have stated you don't support it, but I would definitely classify these actions as "lunatic extremists" and "militant".

Apologies for going off-topic and I am not condoning the sport of coursing, but I cannot let such organisations be defended when I have seen their brutal acts first hand.

It was nice of you to attempt to answer people's queries and I'm sure people appreciate that. However, imo you would be deluded to think that you have a realistic chance of being elected.
I'm sure you could have campaigned your views effeciantly had you ran independently but I will not even be reading your manifesto, you will simply be going to the bottom of my vote card due to your political affiliation.

Raiser

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

What additional cost is this having on our cost effectivness? Your point about Limerick is welcome but why would anyone set up on the west coast with the cost of transport?

By my calculations, current carbon tax on petrol is less than 3% of total cost.

Current fuel costs in Ireland are actually pretty average compared with other Western European countries - see http://www.aaireland.ie/AA/Motoring-advice/Petrol-Prices.aspx

Finally, it will be a strategic competitive advantage for Ireland to be less reliant on oil. We should be harnessing the wind and wave resources that we have for our energy needs, rather than importing oil from unstable Arab countries.

Sheila why don't you point out a wind or wave powered Car and educate us so we might bow to your logic and pursue your rational and utterly feasible alternative?

- The Green Party needed to fix public transport before punishing consumption of petrol/diesel, we can't leave the Car at home because the Bus/Train/Tram is not in place now and with you and yours acting for us then they never, ever will be.

Was there no other hobbies left to try that you had to run for Political Office? They do 10,000 piece jigsaws now you know......

I also am curious re the funding of your core business, are you formerly public gone private? Please excuse my innocence, I'm not familiar with your concerns and the organisations, contacts involved etc. Just curious as to how did that all play out historically, a casual question only and asked upon reading your brief bio from the link provided above which gives only some details in brief.

P.S - I think the Family in number 45 might be Arabs, is there a number I can ring if I observe instability?

rainbowdash

Will you wind up your current business interests or will your snout be in multiple public sector troughs if elected to Dail Eireann?

If Aer Lingus pulled out of Shannon again, and you were in government and it went to a Dail vote would vote for the people who elected you or would you tow the party line?

bazz26

phill106 wrote: »

I'd like to see the breakdown per every euro spent on petrol, how much the government gets out of it.
All very well saying carbon is bad, but how are those of us outside dublin city centre supposed to get to work? I live in shannon, work near mungret.
Until we have an effective, nationwide, affordable public transport system, servicing all areas, don't put up fuel costs!

Breakdown here in the price of a litre of fuel:

http://www.pumps.ie/FAQPricesExplained.php

Summary: A litre of unleaded costs €1.46, Government takes €0.85 from that including the tree hugger carbon tax.

Friday is judgement day for these gombeens.

flyingsnail

If elected will you cease to run you current business?

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

What additional cost is this having on our cost effectivness? Your point about Limerick is welcome but why would anyone set up on the west coast with the cost of transport?

By my calculations, current carbon tax on petrol is less than 3% of total cost.

Current fuel costs in Ireland are actually pretty average compared with other Western European countries - see http://www.aaireland.ie/AA/Motoring-advice/Petrol-Prices.aspx

Finally, it will be a strategic competitive advantage for Ireland to be less reliant on oil. We should be harnessing the wind and wave resources that we have for our energy needs, rather than importing oil from unstable Arab countries.

Could you please point me in the direction of a practical day to day car powered by wind or waves?

Insect Overlord

I've removed 21 posts from this thread and used them to start another one.

From here on in:

If you have a genuine question for the Green Party candidate Sheila Cahill, post it here.
If I feel a post is unsuitable for any reason, I will deal with it accordingly.
This may be a small <snip>, a post deletion or a ban, depending on the post-content.
If you want to debate any of the answers here with other posters, then use the other thread.

osarusan

According to Sheila's post 22, she won't be posting here again.

Insect Overlord

osarusan wrote: »

According to Sheila's post 22, she won't be posting here again.

Hmmm. I'll ask a few questions about this. A representative posting three times in 4 days is not what I had in mind for this thread.

osarusan

Insect Overlord wrote: »

Hmmm. I'll ask a few questions about this. A representative posting three times in 4 days is not what I had in mind for this thread.

She (and her representatives) may feel that the two campaigning days left would be better spent doing other things than reading and responding to posts on this thread.

Icky Thump

to be fair the level of maturity by certain posters on this thread has driven away a well intentioned candidate away from this area of communication. its sad.

Sheila will be getting my number one

firstly i want to vote for somebody new. i dont want these idiots that have already been there (doing nothing for the country) to be voted back in.

its a shame that there wasnt more tds who would just go away after the last attempt at having a government in this country.


secondly, are you all insane................. i mean seriously. attacking her because she is going green party?????

lets see the other options
FF ..................... haha yea right
FG do you actually believe they stopped being corrupt and now they will do the right thing for us?? we thought that about FF the last time around and look how that turned out
labour ......... wow this one is the best. theu are struggling to be a minority party with FG and they cant stop picking fights with them. yea they will really help the country. if you think the greens backed out when things went bad just wait and see what labour will do.
then we have the socialists and the religious parties............. yea i wonder if god can save the country

my point is not one single party should be favoured this time around.

no party should be voted for


we should be voting for the right candidate. the candidate. the person that will fight tooth and naill for this city.
and im not talking about willie's fighting skills either.

Willie o'dea does favours for people in this city and he will get voted back in. UNFORTUNATLY.

he is a good people person but what exactly does he do for the country. his job was to implement policy and run the government ffs not to do favours for tom down the road who needs a medical card. go to your local counciller for that tom.





so im voting for sheila. i dont know the woman and before the campaign i never heard of her. i just checked the list of candidates last week and done my research. im voting for whpo i think deserves it. the person i believe will make a difference. the person from her backround shows that she wants to make a change.

im not telling you all to vote for her. im telling you all to do some reading and find out about the candidates instead of just foccusing on the parties(like we always do and look at us now). lets make a difference people lets vote with our brains for once and not vote for the conmen or the lads who can do us a favour.



good luck Sheila

Itsdacraic

Icky Thump wrote: »

to be fair the level of maturity by certain posters on this thread has driven away a well intentioned candidate away from this area of communication. its sad.

Sheila will be getting my number one

firstly i want to vote for somebody new. i dont want these idiots that have already been there (doing nothing for the country) to be voted back in.

its a shame that there wasnt more tds who would just go away after the last attempt at having a government in this country.


secondly, are you all insane................. i mean seriously. attacking her because she is going green party?????

I've actually done from research myself and it turns out that Green Party, who Sheila is a member of, were actually in power for the past 4 years with Fianna Fail while the country went down the swanny.

Insect Overlord

Thread closed, pending further advice.

Insect Overlord

Some further answers from Sheila Cahill, sent via PM:

Sheila Cahill wrote:

Sheila why don't you point out a wind or wave powered Car and educate us so we might bow to your logic and pursue your rational and utterly feasible alternative?

Could you please point me in the direction of a practical day to day car powered by wind or waves?

Nissan/Renault chose Ireland as one of their 'launch countries' for their electric car range this year. This is great news because although we don't produce the 'hardware' (i.e. the cars), we have a real chance to become experts in the 'software' -- the charging infrastructure and grid arrangements. We've a natural competitive advantage for implementing electric cars, we have (unfortunately) a very car-dependent society, we have a fast-expanding wind energy capacity, and we don't have much heavy industry which requires lots of electricity at night.

Nissan/Renault are launching their electric cars this year in Ireland, thanks to Green Party policy. If you're someone who believes that oil will stay under $100 a barrel for the next 20 years, then this will all seem a bit irrelevant (although it seems like it already hit that price today), but I think we need to be planning now for the possibility that oil might hit $200 a barrel, and doing everything we can to ensure that our economy and society isn't destroyed if this happens.

Was there no other hobbies left to try that you had to run for Political Office? They do 10,000 piece jigsaws now you know......

I don't apologise for standing up for the principles and policies that I believe in. To be honest I respect anyone who is prepared to put themselves forward in front of the electorate, including all of the candidates in Limerick City. I have met most of the candidates on the campaign trail and even though I disagree with them on policy, I do respect the fact that they are engaging in the democratic process.

I also am curious re the funding of your core business, are you formerly public gone private?

No. I worked for a community and voluntary organisation (the Carmichael Centre) since 2000. I now work for myself.

Will you wind up your current business interests or will your snout be in multiple public sector troughs if elected to Dail Eireann?

If elected will you cease to run you current business?

Yes, I will cease to run my current business if elected.

If Aer Lingus pulled out of Shannon again, and you were in government and it went to a Dail vote would vote for the people who elected you or would you tow the party line?

On the Shannon question, I think we all need to work together to ensure that the mid-west region offers a compelling tourism product so that there is a high demand for flights to Shannon. Our region needs to be attracting visitors on its own merits, not just because of a government shareholding in an airline. On the question of Aer Lingus pulling out of Shannon and a Dáil vote, I would use my influence to communicate with my party colleagues in forming a policy position, and I would actively seek out the views of constituents in this process. But I wouldn't be the kind of TD that would break with a policy position just because I thought it would get me more votes in my constituency.

Insect Overlord

Okay, having had further contact from Ms Cahill, I think we can open this thread again. With tomorrow being the big day, it's unlikely that questions will be answered in the coming days, but any genuine queries should be responded to soon enough.

Amazotheamazing

I'm very conflicted by this, tbh. The Green party have excellent policies, and in Shelia Cahill and formerly James Nix, they seem to have excellent candidates but their leadership badly let Ireland (and the Green Party themselves) down over their term in Government.

I'm not surprised there's a lot of anger on this thread, it's fully deserved, but how many of the outraged people on here actually got out and worked for change during this election? I canvassed for Keiran O'Donnell, not because I think he's the bees knees or anything, but I felt I needed to get out and try and make a change. I could just no longer sit at home and watch from the sidelines. Part of me wanted to canvass with Leddin, part of me wanted to canvass just to try and stop SF getting a seat. At least I can say i tried to make a difference, I hope the whiners on here can say the same.

Politically I'm centrist, I could easily swing back to Labour or the Greens if I feel FG let the country down in the next Government. I hope candidates like Sheila Cahill and Cian Prenderville stay involved, our city council badly needs fresh ideas and hopefully this round of canvassing will stand to them.

cancan

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

A small example of the kind of employment that can be generated in Limerick is Southill Community Services. Under the Warmer Homes Scheme they provide insulation and energy-efficiency measures to homes in Co. Limerick, East Co. Clare, North Co. Tipperary and South Co. Offaly to low-income households under the Warmer Homes Scheme. I don't have the current number of people employed under this scheme in Southill to hand, but it's a real example of the kind of "Green Jobs" that can deliver for Limerick.

IFinally, Limerick's position on the western seaboard and our access to road and rail links, as well as our access to talented graduates, would make it an ideal location for a green technology hub. Our geographical position makes us an ideal place for timber processing, sustainable food processing and creative services. We could play to those strengths.

First off thanks for coming on here.

Why is it that any jobs the green party claims to have created, always involve he taxpayer shelling out bucketloads of cash in grants to make happen.
The ride to work scheme - cash cash cash.
Home insulation - cash cash cash.

Have you guys ever managed to crerate 1 job that did not involve throwing taxpayers money away to create?

If you are paying over the odds in grants to create 'jobs', you're not creating jobs at the end of the day.

Pull the grants and the jobs go - This is not a sustainable policy for the future.
The greens seem to be well capable of giving other peoples money away, but very poor at coming up with good long term job creation strategies.


Also, can you explain the logic of me having to shell out 600 quid to tax my car that is worth less than 500 euro, when people who buy new 80k BMW's pay 200 a year?
Miles traveled and pollution created don't even enter the equation.

Why bother with having all these motor tax office people sitting around doing very little when a simplified tax on fuel would be much fairer and easier to police.

phill106

If Aer Lingus pulled out of Shannon again, and you were in government and it went to a Dail vote would vote for the people who elected you or would you tow the party line?

On the Shannon question, I think we all need to work together to ensure that the mid-west region offers a compelling tourism product so that there is a high demand for flights to Shannon. Our region needs to be attracting visitors on its own merits, not just because of a government shareholding in an airline. On the question of Aer Lingus pulling out of Shannon and a Dáil vote, I would use my influence to communicate with my party colleagues in forming a policy position, and I would actively seek out the views of constituents in this process. But I wouldn't be the kind of TD that would break with a policy position just because I thought it would get me more votes in my constituency.

So toe the party line then, ignoring the wishes of your constituents that elected you ,if the party line was to not interfere in the running of aer lingus, despite being a major shareholder.
Those votes would have voted you in, and you valued there opinion then. Why would you then ignore those same voters once you had the chance?
Good to know though...

Sheila Cahill

Hi everyone. A few more questions answered below. I'll try to be online again later this evening to answer any final questions you might have. Thanks to everyone who has contributed so far.

I'm not surprised there's a lot of anger on this thread, it's fully deserved, but how many of the outraged people on here actually got out and worked for change during this election? I canvassed for Keiran O'Donnell, not because I think he's the bees knees or anything, but I felt I needed to get out and try and make a change. I could just no longer sit at home and watch from the sidelines.

Hi there, I know you didn't ask a question but I just wanted to say fair play for getting out there. Obviously I don't agree with Kieran O'Donnell's positions on a wide range of issues, but I have the utmost respect for anyone who's prepared to engage with politics. Local elections aren't that far away and I'd love to see a shake-up in Limerick City Council, with more women and young people in particular standing for election. Hopefully you got bitten by the canvassing bug and you'll continue to make a contribution to politics.

Why is it that any jobs the green party claims to have created, always involve he taxpayer shelling out bucketloads of cash in grants to make happen.

First of all, you'll notice that all parties' manifestos contain commitments to spending taxpayer's money generating jobs. So it's not just a Green Party thing.
I think the current unemployment crisis does justify the spending of money to create jobs. The plummet in the construction sector followed by jobs losses in other sectors of the economy have made a huge number of people unemployed, particularly young males.

I believe that when you spend money creating jobs, the trick is to make sure that there's a long-term benefit to society beyond taking someone off the live register, as important as that is. The objective of the insulation programme is to make sure that people need to spend less money heating their homes. Oil just reached €120 a barrel. I've said this before, I don't think €200 a barrel is out of the question. If we can insulate (pardon the pun) ourselves from the impact of another oil crisis, our economy and society will be better off as a result.

It's also worth noting that Labour, Fine Gael, Sinn Fein, Fianna Fail and the Socialist Party have all copied our insulation scheme policy to some extent, so if you really are opposed to it, your voting options are limited...

I also think the Green Party's proposal to train 20,000 unemployed people to work with 100,000 Irish businesses to help them sell online is a great idea, and good value at an estimated cost of €75m over 5 years

Also, can you explain the logic of me having to shell out 600 quid to tax my car that is worth less than 500 euro, when people who buy new 80k BMW's pay 200 a year?
A decision was made that the new, emissions-based taxes would only apply to cars registered after the new rules came in. Reason being that it was unfair to change people from a cc-based charge to a CO2 based charge retrospectively.
The justification on changing the tax in the first place was to change the basis of the tax from something arbitrary (engine capacity) to something that causes society harm (CO2 emissions)

So toe the party line then, ignoring the wishes of your constituents that elected you ,if the party line was to not interfere in the running of aer lingus, despite being a major shareholder.
Those votes would have voted you in, and you valued there opinion then. Why would you then ignore those same voters once you had the chance?

I'm not saying ignore voters at all, in fact I'd like to do exactly the opposite. I think there's lots of scope for using electronic and other means to efficiently get the views of constituents (and if elected I would be back on this forum and others looking for ideas on how this could be done effectively). What I am saying is that I am putting myself forward as a member of a political party on a comprehensive platform. That does mean that policy positions get taken on what we think is in the best interests of all people in Ireland. Obviously electing a Green TD for Limerick City would ensure a strong Limerick voice in these discussions.

As I've mentioned before there's a more fundamental issue to tackle in relation to Shannon Airport. We need to work on a regional basis (and the Greens' proposals for regional authorities would help in this regard) to make sure that Shannon is a gateway to a world-class tourism product, which includes Limerick as a vibrant and eco-friendly urban centre. That's the only thing that will make Shannon thrive in the long-run.


Sheila.

cancan

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

Why is it that any jobs the green party claims to have created, always involve he taxpayer shelling out bucketloads of cash in grants to make happen.

First of all, you'll notice that all parties' manifestos contain commitments to spending taxpayer's money generating jobs. So it's not just a Green Party thing.
I think the current unemployment crisis does justify the spending of money to create jobs. The plummet in the construction sector followed by jobs losses in other sectors of the economy have made a huge number of people unemployed, particularly young males.

I believe that when you spend money creating jobs, the trick is to make sure that there's a long-term benefit to society beyond taking someone off the live register, as important as that is. The objective of the insulation programme is to make sure that people need to spend less money heating their homes. Oil just reached €120 a barrel. I've said this before, I don't think €200 a barrel is out of the question. If we can insulate (pardon the pun) ourselves from the impact of another oil crisis, our economy and society will be better off as a result.

Perhaps if oil products were not made up of 70% tax already we wouldn't be damaging the economy with prices as they are. If it goes to $200, would you support tax being reduced by 50% to keep our economy moving? You can't keep slapping a tax on something if there is no viable alternative to. Given that most of our power is generated by fossil fuels anyway. We're creating our own oil crisis with the ridiculous taxation already being put upon the motorist. With costs as high as they are, it's pretty obvious that people have no choice but to use their current modes of transport, and have no choice in having to pay these huge costs.

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

It's also worth noting that Labour, Fine Gael, Sinn Fein, Fianna Fail and the Socialist Party have all copied our insulation scheme policy to some extent, so if you really are opposed to it, your voting options are limited...

I'm not opposed to green initiatives - I'm oppossed to ones that rely on taxpayer funding to make them viable at the expense of other areas of the economy where the money could be put to more productive use.

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

I also think the Green Party's proposal to train 20,000 unemployed people to work with 100,000 Irish businesses to help them sell online is a great idea, and good value at an estimated cost of €75m over 5 years

Sell what on line exactly - this sounds like another Ennis Information Age white elephant - if a business person has not figured out by now that the internet may be used to increase sales, they really shouldn't be in business in the first place.
Why not save 75 million by pointing those who would partake in that training course at google and search "how to sell stuff online"

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

Also, can you explain the logic of me having to shell out 600 quid to tax my car that is worth less than 500 euro, when people who buy new 80k BMW's pay 200 a year?
A decision was made that the new, emissions-based taxes would only apply to cars registered after the new rules came in. Reason being that it was unfair to change people from a cc-based charge to a CO2 based charge retrospectively.
The justification on changing the tax in the first place was to change the basis of the tax from something arbitrary (engine capacity) to something that causes society harm (CO2 emissions)

Which produces more Co2 - A new 80k BMW doing 50k kms a year (tax 156 a year), or a 15 year old 2ltr Carina doing 5k km's per year (600+ road tax per year).
Lets not kid ourselves here - the new tax bands do absolutely bugger all for the environment, (I don’t see how forcing people to purchase new cars ever would, while making older ones disposable), erodes the values of older cars, and is in effect a tax on the poorer in society.

Green policy is all about taxing the bejesus out of anything which it's founders don't like as an excuse not to tackle problems with viable long term solutions, and is the primary reason why they are languishing in the polls.

Either way, I wish you the best in the election, and commend you for coming on here. It shows great initiative, and shows that while I may disagree with green policies, you guys have some very decent people running for you.

It's a pity people will vote for O'Dea and his likes again, but that is not your fault.

Amazotheamazing

Sheila Cahill wrote: »

Hi there, I know you didn't ask a question but I just wanted to say fair play for getting out there. Obviously I don't agree with Kieran O'Donnell's positions on a wide range of issues, but I have the utmost respect for anyone who's prepared to engage with politics. Local elections aren't that far away and I'd love to see a shake-up in Limerick City Council, with more women and young people in particular standing for election. Hopefully you got bitten by the canvassing bug and you'll continue to make a contribution to politics.

The way things are going it's hard to know if I'll still be here by the time the local elections roll around but looking at the current council we have, it's clear change is needed. I'm no hardcore FG supporter, indeed, I think guys like Kiely make both Limerick and FG look bad so hopefully more small parties like the Greens and the Socialists can make an impact.

Sheila Cahill

Thanks for the replies and further questions.

Perhaps if oil products were not made up of 70% tax already we wouldn't be damaging the economy with prices as they are. If it goes to $200, would you support tax being reduced by 50% to keep our economy moving?

If oil is going to go up to €200 a barrel, we need to be taking action now, because by the time the price of oil gets that high, we won't have any money to relieve the burden on lower-income families, and it'll be too late to do anything about our oil dependence. Countries like Sweden are already ahead of us on this. Waiting until the next oil crisis isn't an option.

Which produces more Co2 - A new 80k BMW doing 50k kms a year (tax 156 a year), or a 15 year old 2ltr Carina doing 5k km's per year (600+ road tax per year).

Agree with you that the CO2 emissions of producing a new car needs to be taken into account, but given that today's new cars will eventually become second hand cars, it made sense to re-jig our motor car system to encourage people to buy energy-efficient cars.


Thanks,

Sheila.

gaf1983

I asked this candidate a few questions before and in fairness she sent some very thoughtful detailed replies. You can read 5 other candidates' (Noonan, Leddin, O'Dea, O'Sullivan and Quinlivan) responses to the same questions here:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=70852682&postcount=258

Grizzly 45

After reading this all I can say GONE AND GOOD RIDDANCE TO THIS GREEN PEST!!

Clareman

I can't see any reason to keep this open seeing as the election is long since over.