Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Renaults Front exit exhaust

Options
  • 01-02-2011 3:34pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭


    Seems like a innovative idea from Renault - could be this years F-duct

    link

    Scarbsf1's Blog

    Everything technical in F1
    Renault R31 Front Exit Exhausts (FEE) – Explained

    Renault have found a new solution to the blown diffuser concept. In fact they’ve turned it on its head. With an exhaust that exits at the front of the sidepods.

    Last years teams reintroduced the blown diffuser concept, either by blowing exhaust gasses over the top of the diffuser, or by creating an opening into the diffuser to blow inside the diffuser. Both solutions created more downforce. With the latter solution now banned, it seemed the less effective over-blown solutions are all that’s left to race. However LRGP have found another way, blowing the front edge of the floor.

    For a diffuser to create downforce it needs as much flow to pass through the venturi as possible. Teams arrange bargeboards and other aero devices to build up a high pressure region ahead of the floor to ensure the greatest mass flow underneath. Its then down to the expansion ratio of the diffuser to pull that flow through. Last years blown diffusers improved the expansion ratio, but not the flow ahead of the floor. What Renault have done in to lead the exhausts forward through the sidepods (about 1 meter) in-between the chassis and the radiators, then turn the exhaust 90-degrees to point it down towards the leading edge of the floor. The exhausts gasses follow the curved leading edge and round underneath the floor. This accelerates the flow under the floor for more mass flow and hence more downforce.

    Problems with this solution are mainly to do with heat and engine mapping. With exhaust temperatures of 6-800c some clever insulation solutions are needed to keep hits heat from the fuel tank, radiators and a electronics. Then the Renault engine team lead by Rob White need to design exhaust tuning to deal with a far longer secondary pipe. typically longer pipes are better for low revs, somewhat contrary to the needs of an engine running at 18000rpm. Renault placed their KERS MGU and Battery underneath eh fuel tank, this was clearly to allow the packaging of the FEE. Unlike the McLaren F-duct, it is possible for this solution to be copied as no monocoque alterations are required.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭voxpop


    Ficus wrote: »
    Its very clever thinking alright by the Lotus-renault boys indeed. But i suppose the most important thing from that write up is the last line "Unlike the McLaren F-duct, it is possible for this solution to be copied as no monocoque alterations are required."

    Would it be that easy to copy? - even with the Renault car, its unclear whether they will have heat issues and the side pods are bigger than most others. Trying to shoe horn the setup into a car that wasnt designed for it during the season would be risky enough imo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,475 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Anyone care to guess how long before its banned then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    I think its a brilliant piece of work by the Lotus boys, Chapman would be pleased.

    It's very clever and innovative (and hopefully not too easy for the other teams to copy), but I doubt that Chapman would be very impressed at the idea of Toleman... Benetton... Renault trying to pass itself off as 'Lotus'. The car is a 'Lotus' in the same way as the Ferrari is a 'Marlboro'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,069 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    Will be interesting to see if it works

    still bit of time before start of season if other teams want to look into it,

    Sounds tricky enough to design in


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,823 ✭✭✭EvilMonkey


    No point in trying to copy it until we see if it gives a significant advantage and doesn't overheat underside of the car or if the engine looses some performance. The Renault had one of the best engine for accelerating out of a corner last season.

    McLaren are rumoured to be doing something similar, but i haven't seen any pics yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭voxpop


    seems redbull have their own take on getting around the banning of the blown diffuser - by channelling the exhaust gasses along the inner edge of the diffuser.

    rbr_of_ebd.jpg?w=300&h=212


    link


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,823 ✭✭✭EvilMonkey


    The Blown diffuser isn't banned everyone has one of some sort, double diffusers are banned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭voxpop


    I thought they had new regs in regards to blowing exhaust gasses through the diffuser - i.e. the diffuser had to be solid bar a small hole for the starter,etc


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,823 ✭✭✭EvilMonkey


    I could be wrong but my understanding is the rear diffuser has to be a single piece with no holes(except the starter hole) in it and they cant have a hole in the floor to drive air through it. But their is no rule against driving the diffuser with exhaust gases.

    They have banned the blown rear wing(made redundant by the adjustable rear wing anyway), and double diffusers.

    Red Bull are getting round having no hole in the floor in the pic you posted, i think!


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,069 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/red-bull-rb7-open-fronted-exhaust-blown-diffuser/

    According to the above there is still an area in the outer 5cm of the diffuser that can have openings

    Renault put in fastest time today on the final day of the test today


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 30,069 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    Good discussion here

    http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9450

    looks like it diverts some of the air hitting the leading edge of the floor out sideways, less air getting under the floor

    don't really see it accelerating the air under the floor


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Good discussion here

    http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9450

    looks like it diverts some of the air hitting the leading edge of the floor out sideways, less air getting under the floor

    don't really see it accelerating the air under the floor

    Less air getting under the car providing negative pressure, sucking the car down - more downforce.

    But how much air is it diverting, is the whole design package banking on this innovation!!? Yesterday's testing times may indicate so, but until the first quali session we won't know...

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



Advertisement