Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The undeserved umbrage of theists

  • 25-01-2011 11:02am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭


    "That's offensive" is a quick and easy way to to shut down ideas that
    you can't face up to, such as criticisms of religion.
    Usually if you probe a little, you'll find an ironic vitriol in the
    person who says it. "Richard Dawkins is an ignorant ****ing piece of
    ****, he's so judgemental of other people."
    Hilarious.

    Theists' distaste for atheists is not a function of how impolite the
    atheist is, but of how close the atheist gets to successfully rattling
    the foundations of their beliefs.

    If you wanted to maintain the delusion of Santa Clause among adults,
    the first thing you'd do is impose a moratorium on harsh criticism of
    Him. The acceptable discussion would be "hard questions" (as theists
    pretend to ask themselves) on why Santa Clause does what he does. Why,
    for example, does he give more presents to rich kids than poor kids?
    The followers would come up with Clause Theodicy to explore and
    explain it, asking themselves these deep questions. Some rude brat
    would ask "what is the best argument for Santa's existence?", and the
    follower would shoot back: "Santa doesn't need an argument."

    No matter how politely atheists phrase an effective point that
    undermines theism, the theist will loathe the idea. An atheist who
    explicitly takes the piss out of religion gives the theist a pretext
    for ignoring his points. And the super-polite atheist who manages to
    nail the Christian is the most annoying of them all, but they won't
    admit that.

    And this is natural. The atheist is implicitly telling you: your cult fairytales
    are so ridiculous that they wouldn't get into an episode of Xena
    Warrior Princess. Therefore, you're a deluded idiot, and your whole
    life is a monument to the perverse depths of gullibility
    (incidentally, in my opinion delusion is largely independent of
    intelligence.)

    That's devastating. For a theist, to accept that they could be utterly
    wrong about the very core of their worldview would elicit
    mind-rupturing explosions of cognitive dissonance and horrific mental
    cost that most are not strong enough to endure. (Tellingly, this is
    not so for most atheists - including me - who would love to be wrong
    about this; wouldn't it be nice if there was an afterlife).

    If you want to play the offense game, I'm offended that you tell
    children they're going to burn in hell if they don't follow your cult;
    by your demands for censorship and the punishment you dole out to
    apostates; by the poison your pour into children's minds; by your
    cowardly denial of the misery and suffering religion causes worldwide
    and has caused throughout history. You're offended by our words? What
    a perverse joke. We're offended by your deeds.

    Idiots have tried to say,
    "militant atheists are just as bad as religious fundamentalists". No,
    not by a mile. Not. Even. Close


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    We've had one similar 'thread' already.

    Consider getting a blog if you want to vent.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement