It's never too early to teach your kids about sex?

Lirange

It might best to have "the talk" with your children sooner than you think. At the very least to discuss appropriate behaviour with regards to the "special areas." This story is quite alarming if these allegations are borne out by the investigations.

The alleged incident involves seven year olds

Azureus

Wow, thats fairly ''curious'' for 7 year-olds!! I dont understand how it got to that stage before an adult intervening though, what did they do sit back and watch while that was happening?

Only in America

hondasam

It would seem these children have learned a lot at home from the parents, The parents probably were not aware that the were been watched.

phasers

What exactly could the teacher have done? If he told them to stop they probably wouldn't have listened and if he touched them in any way he'd be called a pedo

TeddyTedson

This just can't be true.

m@cc@

I was taught about sex at an early age by my local priest.

OutlawPete

Children's genitals should be removed at birth and only given them when they reach the age of consent for whichever country they reside. It would stop all this nonsense once and for all.

TeddyTedson

OutlawPete wrote: »

Children's genitals should be removed at birth and only given them when they reach the age of consent for whichever country they reside. It would stop all this nonsense once and for all.

This could be effective

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUtdKm6lERQ

Azureus

phasers wrote: »

What exactly could the teacher have done? If he told them to stop they probably wouldn't have listened and if he touched them in any way he'd be called a pedo

The paedo accusation is depressingly true I agree but aside from that, 'they probably wouldn't have listened' that's hardly a great basis for not doing SOMETHING. In that case, whats the point of teachers ever being present/adult supervision of any kind??

garv123

when i was that young babies still came out of the mammys belly-button:eek::eek:

phasers

Azureus wrote: »

The paedo accusation is depressingly true I agree but aside from that, 'they probably wouldn't have listened' that's hardly a great basis for not doing SOMETHING. In that case, whats the point of teachers ever being present/adult supervision of any kind??

Teachers are there to TEACH, not babysit.

Azureus

How about TEACHING them not to get nekkid and give oral sex aged 7??

Sounds like a fairly good lesson to me....

Dravokivich

"It kind of scares me to know that the teachers aren't really watching them," said Ane Musuva,

Right so erm... If the teacher wasn't watchin'em having an orgy... where'd the kids get the idea?

OutlawPete

Azureus wrote: »

How about TEACHING them not to get nekkid and give oral sex aged 7??

Sounds like a fairly good lesson to me....

Isn't that kinda like telling someone not to picture a blue elephant?

RobbieParmo

Wish i was getting blow jobs when i was seven....

TeddyTedson

RobbieParmo wrote: »

Wish i was getting blow jobs when i was seven....

You weren't an alter boy then:D

Dudess

phasers wrote: »

Teachers are there to TEACH, not babysit.

No they're in loco parentis - they do have a duty of care to the children all right.
Whatever about kids showing each other their bits (and I remember that happening between me and my peers when I was VERY small - like three/four) oral contact with genitals "natural curiosity"? Ah jeez, if that's the case, how come it never occurred to me or any of my peers at seven? When you're a young kid, these are merely what you use to go to the toilet with.

Nevyn

Kids playing drs and nurses or mammy and daddys at that age is normal, but the parents should be stopping it and talk to the kids about what isn't on, other wise you get 14 year old 'raping' 10 year olds as they get older.

Tar.Aldarion

dont think this is rare enough to be that newsworthy, kids are always at it with their bits.