Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Discovery/ Hd at 2100L Cactus 1549

  • 12-01-2011 8:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭


    Just flicking through the TV and saw an advert for a docommentry on flight 1549 with Capt Sullenberg taking what looks to be a chopper ride over the Hudson it's on tonight at 2100L.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 186 ✭✭CabanasBoy


    I got a book at crimbo called "Fly by wire" by William Langewiesche (very knowledgeable aviation author) about the ditching, highly recommend it. The author hints that the safe glide and ditching would not have been possible in any other aircraft bar an Airbus due to the level of automation built in to the 'Bus. He also wonders why Sully never made any reference during press conferences to the 320's wonderful behaviour during the crisis and puts it down to the fact that a lot of pilots disliked the Airbus's because of the levels of automation (the author referred to the 'bus as "semi robotic"). I would advise anybody to read the book.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    Ah sure you have sayings like Scarebus and If it's not a Boeing im not going and my favorite im going like a Boeing when asked how the workload is going.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 186 ✭✭CabanasBoy


    Yep, management in Boeing laughed when the A300 was launched way back when, they ain't laughing anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 708 ✭✭✭A320


    Well there is for and against on both from a maintenance point of view!!

    Any avionic/electrical stuff in the airbus pax cabin for example is a nightmare, boeing is more basic and better!! The Airbus cabin,i could write a book on,its ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭PapaQuebec


    Saw trails for the prog and wondered why Capt. Sullenberger is referred to as "Capt. SCULLY"??? Anyone else notice this?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 794 ✭✭✭electric69


    Saw trails for the prog and wondered why Capt. Sullenberger is referred to as "Capt. SCULLY"??? Anyone else notice this?

    What you heard was Capt. Sully. Its his nickname.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    The A320 did perform well and kept itself from stalling but I wonder how a 737 would have performed in the same situation with a good pilot.

    Sully knew the best glide speed and rate of descent to maintain on the way down and then judged his flare very well in the final few seconds...wouldn't a good boeing crew be able to do the same? An airbus will keep itself within the enveliope without stalling perhaps better then a boeing would but surely good airmanship would give you just as good a chance? Am I right in saying it would have involved a lot more manual calculations of the correct Vref and rate of descent whereas an airbus would work it out itself and keep the aircraft from stalling no matter what the stick position?

    Would be interesting to have someone in a 737 simulator try the same situation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Danbo!


    This is being repeated on discovery now, 15 mins in, for anyone that missed it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,323 ✭✭✭phonypony


    electric69 wrote: »
    What you heard was Capt. Sully. Its his nickname.

    In the Promos for the show they referred to him in text and voiceover as 'Scully' and before the show aired they called him 'Chelsey'...

    I emailed Discovery about the promo over Xmas, they didn't care to respond, I guess they just dropped the ball on that one


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 186 ✭✭CabanasBoy


    pclancy wrote: »
    The A320 did perform well and kept itself from stalling but I wonder how a 737 would have performed in the same situation with a good pilot.

    Sully knew the best glide speed and rate of descent to maintain on the way down and then judged his flare very well in the final few seconds...wouldn't a good boeing crew be able to do the same? An airbus will keep itself within the enveliope without stalling perhaps better then a boeing would but surely good airmanship would give you just as good a chance? Am I right in saying it would have involved a lot more manual calculations of the correct Vref and rate of descent whereas an airbus would work it out itself and keep the aircraft from stalling no matter what the stick position?

    Would be interesting to have someone in a 737 simulator try the same situation.


    Maybe from a greater altitude (more time for pilots to react/calculate etc) a good crew could probably glide a Boeing in.

    From the altitude flt 1549 was at it was the 320's automation which made the day by doing the basic stuff of keeping the plane flying whilst allowing the crew get on with dealing with the emergency.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭PapaQuebec


    electric69 wrote: »
    What you heard was Capt. Sully. Its his nickname.

    It wasn't spoken as "Scully", it was spelt in the graphic-overlay as "Scully"!!
    I'm well aware of the Capt's nickname. I've since downloaded and watched the doc from a US website where it was entitled "Brace for Impact" with a different intro-graphic.

    I saw the ad for the Discovery show several times and wasn't mistaken!


Advertisement