Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

corporation tax computation

  • 07-01-2011 11:59am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭


    hi all,

    I'm in the middle of revising for a college tax exams. I doing out some corporation tax computations and I'm just wondering can anyone tell me why a telephone bill which is unpaid @ time of accounts being done up is "added back" to net profit? I'm sure it's a simple explanation but I haven't cme across it before and my lecturer hasn't replied to my email.

    Thanks :D


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    tax is based on an actual expenditure/revenue basis, not accruals and prepayments. so you haven't actually incurred the expense yet from a tax point of view and don't until you pay it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭starface


    Pretty straight forward really.... oops on my part. My lectured would be ashamed, actually maybe that's why she didn't reply.

    Thanks you for your reply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭foundation10


    I would suggest that you seek clarification as I would not add back costs simply because they remain unpaid at the end of year. Corporation tax is levied on the profits of a company for any given period and in determining profits you will need to include costs which have been incurred in that specific period. This does not necessarily mean that the costs have been paid, they can be acrrued or included within creditors. What I would think the addback relates to is the private usage element of the telephone. This is my 2c worth!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    tax is based on an actual expenditure/revenue basis, not accruals and prepayments. so you haven't actually incurred the expense yet from a tax point of view and don't until you pay it.

    Simply not true.

    Case I is always calculated on the accruals basis.

    Case IV Income is on a receipt basis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,705 ✭✭✭✭namenotavailablE


    As per previous post, Case I is most definitely NOT computed on a 'cash receipts/payments' basis.

    If the telephone addback was for non-business purposes it would be a correct addback. However, if it was added back simply because it wasn't paid that is a fundamental error (and I sincerely hope that it wasn't the method shown by your lecturer).


  • Advertisement
Advertisement