Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A Christmas Carol

  • 19-12-2010 12:30am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭


    Well seeing as it's less than a week time for a thread:

    4 clips included in the below video, doesn't give away too much if you already know the cast and basic storyline.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZejNx20e-lc&feature=player_embedded

    Seems very Christmassy obviously. Not sure if we can expect much from this as regards the series arch.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



Comments

  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    K-9 wrote: »
    Well seeing as it's less than a week time for a thread:

    4 clips included in the below video, doesn't give away too much if you already know the cast and basic storyline.



    Seems very Christmassy obviously. Not sure if we can expect much from this as regards the series arch.

    FYP. :)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    This is the first time I've found myself genuinely looking forward to the xmas episode. It looks like it'll be a fun, Dickensian fairy-tale (in a steampunk'y sorta way), which is a far cry from the camp excesses of previous years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Jessibelle


    pixelburp wrote: »
    This is the first time I've found myself genuinely looking forward to the xmas episode. It looks like it'll be a fun, Dickensian fairy-tale (in a steampunk'y sorta way), which is a far cry from the camp excesses of previous years.

    AND it has Micheal Gambon :D


    (I kinda worship him....)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    pixelburp wrote: »
    This is the first time I've found myself genuinely looking forward to the xmas episode. It looks like it'll be a fun, Dickensian fairy-tale (in a steampunk'y sorta way), which is a far cry from the camp excesses of previous years.

    True, there is no pretence with this one, it's just a reworked Christmas story.
    Jessibelle wrote: »
    AND it has Micheal Gambon :D


    (I kinda worship him....)

    And Katherine Jenkins to look at too.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Jessibelle


    K-9 wrote: »
    .

    And Katherine Jenkins to look at too.

    I wonder if she'll sing? Her voice is amazing!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Jessibelle wrote: »
    I wonder if she'll sing? Her voice is amazing!!

    I think I remember reading on twitter that she may sing one song.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,645 ✭✭✭Daemos


    Somehow I'm less excited about this than other Christmas episodes, maybe because I'm catching up on Classic Who I haven't seen yet and don't feel the break was as long as before.

    Should be good anyway, Moffat hasn't let us down yet


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    K-9 wrote: »
    True, there is no pretence with this one, it's just a reworked Christmas story.



    And Katherine Jenkins to look at too.
    Yup she'll be belting out a tune apparently - so long as it's not something specially written by Murray Gold it should be OK :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Yup she'll be belting out a tune apparently - so long as it's not something specially written by Murray Gold it should be OK :)

    Ah now, some of his stuff isn't bad. Dr. Who live wasn't a bad show at all. The music was the best part.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,085 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I thought some of the new music for the 5th season was excellent. It's the sound mixing that's more of an issue imo.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    The Den of Geek spoiler free review was glowing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,338 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    Am I missing something,
    or was there a Father's Day Paradox near the end, when young Karzan met old?

    Otherwise, it was feckin' BRILLIANT!! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,338 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    Also,
    THE FEZ IS BACK!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    The recording was interrupted, so going to need to wait for a repeat :(


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Easily the best Christmas special. It had it all! Great use of time travel and Matt Smith was wonderful. Some very funny moments but also some poignant ones too. Perhaps they could've used Amy and Rory more but it didn't bother me too much.
    Oh and I need to get a fedora now...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Excellent stuff.. the first Who episode I've watched "live".

    Distinct lack of Amy and Rory, but Gambon and Smith stole the show.

    Couple of cracking lines.. loved it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,645 ✭✭✭Daemos


    Very good indeed, must rewatch it when the repeat is on. A very different tone to the previous Crimbo specials.

    Also, the next time trailer looked... awesome!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Daemos wrote: »
    Also, the next time trailer looked... awesome!
    Arse... missed that! :(

    Will YouTube later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,071 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Wasnt better than EOT or Invasion in terms of Xmas specials......next season looks good though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,085 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I didn't think it was all that great tbh. Better than the RTD specials but that's not saying much.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Just in case anyone, like me, missed the preview after the special..



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Aldebaran


    I thought it was absolutely fantastic. There were some great lines in it too, my favourite being
    'What do you call it when you have no feet but you're taking a run-up?'

    Brilliant.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Needed more Obama recession speeches ;)

    trés bizarre; what a difference a ... year(?) makes. So I vaguely recall at this point last Christmas some handsome young poster - smixelfurp or some such username I believe he was called - writing a long tirade of festive, alcohol-fuelled haranguing, aimed at RTD & his last xmas / who story. This time around that urge doesn't really present itself. In fact if anything I thought this story one of the better nuWho stories since its restart. Mon dieu! (just finished watching Poirot, desolé)

    We have gone from a camp, badly written mess to a poignant, touching & ultimately tragic Christmas story. It's funny how in many ways the show is still as silly (fish flying in the air?), yet its tone is so much less trashy & so somehow it all works. I read an editorial where Matt Smith's season of Who was described as "a fairy tale" and this story confirms it really. Magical, a touch of the fantastic, and yet at the same, quite dark & grim. Or should that be Grimm. Ho ho.

    Roll on season 6; the man-swoon for Matt Smith continues :D Karen Gillen has a hard time keeping my attention - though the re-appearance of the cop uniform helped.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 695 ✭✭✭Banjo Fella


    "You know, that could almost be mistaken for a real person. Snowman isn't bad either." :pac:

    Frickin' fantastic stuff! Definitely my favourite of the Christmas specials, it's the first one that really left me with that magical, festive feeling.

    I loved the clever use of time-travel throughout, and the wonderful way they simultaneously presented the Doctor's influence on the past and present by using the projector. Moffat always has something special in store when he uses the TARDIS for more than providing a setting or an easy resolution to inescapable conundrums, and this was another great example!

    And yay for Abigail, who both looked and sounded lovely. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton


    Watched it yesterday evening with my cousin, but was only half paying attention, so much rewatch it again, but my initial reaction was it was pretty poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,085 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Yeah maybe it needs to be watched without family members annoying you and talking over it every 5 seconds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭off.the.walls


    I thought it was amazing, was the best christmas special so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭bigdaddyliamo


    Well that was just lovely! Sci-fi/fantasy as it should be done.Watched it with my daughter and loved the whole package,really can't wait for easter.......:D
    Best line?..for me:
    what kind of tie is that? it's a cool tie!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭Gambler


    ok, FINALLY got a chance to watch it (had it recorded as I knew it would be ruined if I tried to watch it at the in-laws) and I have to say this was the best xmas special I've seen yet. Had a brilliant mix of laugh out loud moments and yet a real emotional punch all the way through.

    If this is a sign of things to come (have the team hit their stride and found their comfort zone) then this coming season could well be the best of all the new who seasons..


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    not sure ill even bother with the next series after this special

    big pile of meh


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    I liked it, Fish in the fog, Shark Charriots a ver Whovian take on a classic christmas tale, and cool to see Amy in the Police uniform HAWT.

    Whats the story with rory, is he human or a Droid??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 695 ✭✭✭Banjo Fella


    Whats the story with rory, is he human or a Droid??

    He's human again, thanks to the Big Bang Two. Shame in a way, that Auton gun-arm could have come in handy.

    I think he was wearing the centurion gear during this episode for, er, other reasons. Possibly wibbly-wobbly ones, but not very timey-wimey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Am I missing something,
    or was there a Father's Day Paradox near the end, when young Karzan met old?

    Otherwise, it was feckin' BRILLIANT!! :D
    Really enjoyed this episode aside from
    the niggling fact that two Karzans clashes against rules established during recent canon... Was any excuse given for it or am I mis-remembering the detail of Fathers Day and it was something specific to that episode which made it dangerous for one to meet oneself in a past life?
    .


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Anyone notice Ms Jenkins was singing about... the silence?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Jessibelle


    Anyone notice Ms Jenkins was singing about... the silence?

    I thought that's what it was about but wasn't sure I heard properly over teh munching of roses and relatives asking me why this and that was happening. And I never got around to you-tubing it.:o
    Did she have anything interesting to say?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Jessibelle wrote: »
    I thought that's what it was about but wasn't sure I heard properly over teh munching of roses and relatives asking me why this and that was happening. And I never got around to you-tubing it.:o
    Did she have anything interesting to say?

    Mainly repeating about silence being all you hear, when you're alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,338 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    Sleepy wrote: »
    Really enjoyed this episode aside from
    the niggling fact that two Karzans clashes against rules established during recent canon... Was any excuse given for it or am I mis-remembering the detail of Fathers Day and it was something specific to that episode which made it dangerous for one to meet oneself in a past life?
    .

    I read on the IMDb DW forum, where someone gave this explanation.
    Basically, because the Doctor changed Karzan's timeline, with bringing young Karzan to meet Abigail every Christmas Eve, etc etc,etc his whole timeline changed. So because the timeline has changed, there is no longer any link between the Young and Old Karzan that hugged.

    Y. Karzan 1 - The Karzan the Doctor met and took to meet Abigail, save the shark, etc, to put all these new memories into Old Karzan's head.

    Y. Karzan 2 - The Karzan the Doctor brought back to meet Old Karzan. I could be wrong, but possibly he brought him back BEFORE giving this version of young Karzan any of the new experiences YK1 had.

    YK2 has a different timeline to YK1, so this version of him, never really existed, like the Amelia who meets the Doctor, vs the Amelia who doesn't. Not the same person, so nothing happens if they touch.

    Phew!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 537 ✭✭✭angelll


    Think that makes sense in my head busi_girl08,lol. It's like when kazran (with new memories) tried to help at the very end and the machine didn't recognise him as he had changed. I think.

    Anyway,loved this episode,i cried and all :D .So so good. And glad that whinger amy didn't make too much of an appearance in it too.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    I thought the issue in Fathers day was more to do with the Nasty demony thingys that ate Time and space ( Langolieers anyone ), same matter in same space created a paradox which gave them a foothold inside the church, when Rose held Baby Rose it caused this.

    as for Karzan, well the Tardis was part of Events at that point so the timelines were being written and rewritten, because the tardis spanned both timelines simultaneously there was no real issue of a Paradox as the entire multiple timelines issue was encompased as being one TARDIS event, or somesuch, FFS Its a TV Program , if you can suspend disbelief to a Shark that can swim in Fog and tow a buggy then I'm sure we can let the odd universe crushing paradox slide :D:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,085 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    It was more than just Father's Day. The Doctor is never able to revisit people at points in their timestream before he encounters them. If he did, no-one would die in the Whoverse, the Doctor would just take a quick trip back in the TARDIS any time anything happened to them.

    Though I think the reason the alien things appeared in Father's Day was because Pete Tyler ended up alive when he shouldn't have been. More minor changes were doable it seems.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    I thought the issue in Fathers day was more to do with the Nasty demony thingys that ate Time and space ( Langolieers anyone ), same matter in same space created a paradox which gave them a foothold inside the church, when Rose held Baby Rose it caused this.

    Yarp it wasn't Rose touching herself (oo-er) which was so catastrophically bad, it was merely bad enough to make a situation where time and space were already falling apart much worse.


    This definitely falls under either

    a) The ol' "The Doctor knows what he's doing so he can get away with these things in the right conditions" or

    b) TImey wimey.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Stark wrote: »
    It was more than just Father's Day. The Doctor is never able to revisit people at points in their timestream before he encounters them. If he did, no-one would die in the Whoverse, the Doctor would just take a quick trip back in the TARDIS any time anything happened to them.

    Though I think the reason the alien things appeared in Father's Day was because Pete Tyler ended up alive when he shouldn't have been. More minor changes were doable it seems.

    That's not been true in the new series though. Sure he visited Martha as a parlour trick the first time he encounters her- the whole tie thing.

    Not defending it, it opens a can of worms :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,071 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    That episode was no Father's day, or anywhere near it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Just rewatched it.. as first time round, typical Christmas scenario of nothing but questions from non-watchers like "who's that?", "why's he there?", "what's the screwdriver do? Is it a Philips head?" etc.. and enjoyed it even more!

    I do think this episode could possibly be one of Smith's finest performances as The Doctor... the guy can say so much just by a simple stand in the background or a roll of eyes to heaven.

    And I knew Gambon would be great.. but he was absolutely outstanding.

    And the 'Coming Soon' teaser got me all too pumped!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton


    Finally got a chance to sit down and rewatch the episode in peace. Very very good, I thought on the second watch.


Advertisement