Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Econometrics exam question (fairly urgent!)

  • 07-12-2010 8:32pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66 ✭✭


    Hey I've an econometrics exam tomorrow. There's a question thats says.. you are given following data on 15 observations and gives Ex2i squared value, Exiyi value etc..

    I can estimate the intercept and slope coefficient and work through it until you get the t value (beta over S.E) but in the solution (question is for 95% C.I) its says..

    T= 3.4974 therefore Beta 1 is significant (same situation with Beta 2 with 14 or something)

    Anyway how do you decide if its significant, is it if its not between -1.96 and + 1.96 because of the 95% C.I?


    Another similar question, in ramseys RESET I found the F m;n,k value which was 4, and I know that if this is greater than the critical F value the model is misspecified, but how do I find the F value on the tables such as this (95% again)..

    http://home.comcast.net/~sharov/PopEcol/tables/f005.html

    Theres six parameters in the unrestricted and 3 in the restriced model so is it 3,6 or something?

    Sorry if that was a bit long winded!

    Thanks


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭Économiste Monétaire


    The t-statistic is significant at the 1% level. The t = 3.4974 is from testing if [latex] \displaystyle \beta_{1} = 0 [/latex], i.e.,

    [latex] \displaystyle \frac{\beta_{1} - 0}{se(\beta_{1})} = 3.4974 [/latex]

    Look this t-stat up in your tables, with df = 12.

    For the second question, can you give the values for k, m, and n?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66 ✭✭lopppy


    Little confused over using the tables, do i go to 12 on the df and .1 then on the top line, getting 1.782. So is it because the 4.5 t value is greater than this 1.782 that its significant?


    M N K are 3, 44, 6 respectively. Dont need the answer to that question specifically, just how do look up the F value?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭Économiste Monétaire


    .1 means 10% significance level. If that's your cut-off, then, yes, it is significant. Move over to the 0.05 part, and you'll see 2.179, which is less than 3.4974, so it's also significant at the 5% level.

    For the F value, the row of red numbers at the top of your link is the first part in [latex]\displaystyle F_{m,(n-k)} [/latex], which is 3, and the vertical list of red numbers is for second part, n-k, which is 38. The critical value is therefore between 2.84 and 2.87, at the 5% significance level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66 ✭✭lopppy


    .1 means 10% significance level.

    You mean 90%? :p



    Thanks though you saved me staying up half the night!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭Économiste Monétaire


    Most people just say 10%/5%/1% significance level referring to P>|t|. Best of luck with the test.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement