Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

new space plane

  • 04-12-2010 09:46AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭


    Just reading up about the US military's secretive X-37B unmanned spaceplane....looking at two photos on http://www.dailymail.co.uk.....
    there seemed to be a difference in size in relation to the people in the photos.......
    article-1335526-0C56DA19000005DC-450_634x400.jpg
    article-1335526-0C56D9ED000005DC-382_634x427.jpg

    which one is right


Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,585 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    I presume quite a long telephoto lens was used and these can compact perspective making depth appear shallow. This results in foreground and background appearing closer in size that our eyes are used to. A typical telephoto lens is about 200 to 500mm focal lenght while our eyes are around 50mm.

    If you look closely you'll notice the tall guys face mask in line with the Boeing and USAF logos in both shots.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,879 ✭✭✭Coriolanus


    I hadn't realised it was unmanned, but admittedly I skimmed the article on the Beeb.
    Interesting stuff though. :)


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,585 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Yeah it's pretty cool if a bit sinister due to all the military secrecy.
    7 months is pretty impressive. From a science perspective the ability to launch experiments into microgravity and return them in such a manner is great, especially if the cost is low.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,692 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    5uspect wrote: »
    especially if the cost is low.
    US military , originally designed to be launched inside the space shuttle

    Neither are good indicators of being cheap


Advertisement