Stupid Darko

Dublindude69

Ok, I know the S stands for Samantha but seriously, all I could think after sitting through this un needed DTV sequel was Stupid Darko, Stupid Stupid Stupid.
This whole movie is pretensios and stupid. It's a boring cash in sequel that should never of happened. Did Donnie Darko really need a sequel? No it didn't.Ugh, thismovie just annoyed me.

Richard Dower

LOL!!...ok, who else thought this post was about our very own Twilight obsessed Darko!

:-)

Basq

The keywords were "DTV".. what were you expecting?

There's a reason it went direct-to-video.

krudler

This whole movie is pretensios and stupid.

Just like the first one then :pac:

proof positive that a badly edited mess can make a movie seem like genius when it just meant the director didnt have a clue what he was doing, as seen in his subsequent trainwrecks

johnny_ultimate

Richard Dower wrote: »

LOL!!...ok, who else thought this post was about our very own Twilight obsessed Darko!

:-)

That's the first thing I thought, the ban hammer was unholsteted :pac:

But I will never watch this film, ever. By all accounts, it sounds like watching a pile of dog crap for an hour would be more intellectually stimulating.

ronano

johnny_ultimate wrote: »

That's the first thing I thought, the ban hammer was unholsteted :pac:

But I will never watch this film, ever. By all accounts, it sounds like watching a pile of dog crap for an hour would be more intellectually stimulating.

Surely statues in the op honour would be more appropriate?

S Darko looks dire but even with the terrible reviews part of me wants to watch it

Yeah .. I don't like Darko either.
:pac:

I'd love to have seen the boardroom meeting where someone decided it would be a good idea to make a sequel out of Donnie Darko.

Mickeroo

Deleted User wrote: »

I'd love to have seen the boardroom meeting where someone decided it would be a good idea to make a sequel out of Donnie Darko.

"Hmmm that Kelly guy sure ain't making much money for us, maybe we should milk that one movie of his people actually liked again before it's too late"

mikhail

krudler wrote: »

Just like the first one then :pac:

proof positive that a badly edited mess can make a movie seem like genius when it just meant the director didnt have a clue what he was doing, as seen in his subsequent trainwrecks

Am I right in thinking that no one with any connection to Donnie Darko had any input into the 'sequel'?

Dublindude69

mikhail wrote: »

Am I right in thinking that no one with any connection to Donnie Darko had any input into the 'sequel'?

It stars the same girl who plays Samantha in both Darko movies.