Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most ground breaking Gun invented

  • 16-11-2010 1:14pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 120 ✭✭


    When looking back through the last 100 years or so what was the most ground breaking gun (machine/ sub machine/ rifle / pistol)....would like to get people views here....would it be

    MG 42 (put the fear of God into the allies with it's unbeleivable rate of fire)
    Colt Peacemaker
    Winchester 1873 lever action
    AK 47 (Is this only a reincarnation of the Sturmgewehr)
    AR 15 / M16
    Gatling
    Tommy sub machine gun
    BAR (Browning Automatic rifle)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭4gun


    should be in shooting forum ...or military ...not hunting :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    Bouncing this over to Military as it's definitely not Hunting, and the firearms listed wouldn't be used that much in Shooting sports, AR variants and the Winchester aside.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭concussion


    As you go back, everything is a development of what came before - for example, the MG42 was an excellent weapon, but not in a different league to previous machine guns. The machine gun in WW1 is said to have changed warfare forever, but these weapons were developed before the war began and, to a certain extent, the doctrine hadn't caught up. Personally, I would say that the development of a single unitary cartridge was one of the most important (military) inventions of the last few centuries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    concussion wrote: »
    As you go back, everything is a development of what came before - for example, the MG42 was an excellent weapon, but not in a different league to previous machine guns. The machine gun in WW1 is said to have changed warfare forever, but these weapons were developed before the war began and, to a certain extent, the doctrine hadn't caught up. Personally, I would say that the development of a single unitary cartridge was one of the most important (military) inventions of the last few centuries.

    Particularly if you could specify the unitary cartridge burning smokeless powder. Difficult to say really, but I'd nearly attribute it all to Peter Paul Mauser, with the development of a rifle firing a smallbore, smokeless cartridge which could be rapidly reloaded from charging clips. I mean, we're still trying, and for the most part failing, to beat that design, over a hundred years later. I mean, sure, other actions work perfectly well, but none of them are better at that job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭firefly08


    concussion is right about the cartridge.

    The Gatling gun was pretty original. The BAR was a bit different from anything else at the time, in that it was a lightweight machine gun and could be fired easily from the shoulder. Actually I am reading a book by a guy who helped evaluate machine guns for the first world war, and he says the BAR caused a major stir when it first appeared, and was adopted by the army on the spot. (Hatcher's Notebook)

    The Tommy gun was nothing new - the Germans had pioneered the sub machine gun before anyone else and that's what inspired the Thompson.

    The Sturmgewehr was original but failed to be ground-breaking because apparently Hitler didn't like it.

    Some other guns that changed the game on account of being the first of their kind would be the Maxim machine gun (the first truly automatic machine gun), the Winchester Model 1897 pump action shotgun or "trench gun" (the first shotgun adopted as a military weapon afaik) and the M1 Garand, (being a semi auto in a bolt action world)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭Liam_D


    John Moses Brownings 1911 has to be in there. 100 years old next year and still as popular as ever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,500 ✭✭✭ReacherCreature


    Collioure, your time frame is too restrictive. You've to go back further. Previous to that was the invention of the musket for example, hugely important and possibly fundamental. The development of a repeating weapon paved the way for everything that would come.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Hi there,
    Groundbreaking is hard to call.Do you include the MG42 simply for being a fast-firer? Remember, most air forces at the time had equally fast-firing machine guns, such as the Russian Shkas.Infantry machine guns fired about 450-600 rpm, to balance between consumption and overheating.I think the MG42's biggest contribution was it's manufacturing methods and it's feed/locking system, which also applies to the MP40, with plastic and stamped parts.
    The Mauser bolt action speaks for itself.In the case of American arms, the BAR was good when it came out but the Bren and it's equivalents were better.I'd say Eugene Stoner's AR series made a huge impact in the post WW II age. I think most of the better developments are cartridge or sight sytem related.
    regards
    Stovepipe


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,451 ✭✭✭Delancey


    What about the M1 Garand rifle ? Worlds first standard issue semi-automatic weapon , highly regarded by those who used it , reliable and robust ( if not a little on the heavy side ) - I think over 6 million were made.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    It's got to be the sniper rifle,as it's mere existence changed the way war is fought,one single sniper can hold hundreds of soldiers at bay
    As a ground weapon it's psychological impact is second only to the tank
    From the American civil war until now it's still very relevant on the battlefield

    However which exact sniper rifle it is requires a poll!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭firefly08


    However which exact sniper rifle it is requires a poll!

    Thing is, the practice of sniping existed for a long time before anyone "invented" a sniper rifle. Until relatively recently, snipers mostly just used ordinary rifles afaik. Certainly, the most famous snipers I've heard of did. The effect of a sniper seems to me to be more about their tactics then their rifles. So I wouldn't count sniper rifles in general as a ground breaking invention - but maybe there are specialized ones that push the envelope?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    800px-EarlyCannonDeNobilitatibusSapientiiEtPrudentiisRegumManuscriptWalterdeMilemete1326.jpg


    The first one obviously, at the point of the first Cannon appearing on the battlefield Tactics Changed forever, any further developments since are just buildin on this initial deployment, Grtanted Manic may not see a similarity between his Abrams and a Conquistidors Miqulett but they are one and the same in the eyes of the people that dont have them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭AIR-AUSSIE




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    I would say the Prussian Needel gun. It brough Rifel's into the modern age.
    It signaled then end on Napolionaic Lines and signaled the start of the tactacal use of professional troops on the ground in the modern sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,500 ✭✭✭ReacherCreature




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    The Maxim machine gun. It changed everything. Not least in WW1 where all sides used a variant. Warfare changed after that.

    Earlier machine guns needed manual effort. With the Maxim you pulled the trigger and it fired until the belt ran out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭concussion


    It must be said though, that the doctrine of the time allowed the MG to become so devastating. It's very easy to destroy companies, or even battalions at a time, when they are walking across a muddy field towards your lines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,465 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I think Metal Storm and its ilk will be the future of automated defense/attack


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    I dunno about Metal Storm etc, It may be a Weapons manufacturers wet dream to sell a unit that fires 5million bullets at a pop, but its not a practical weapon for a prolonged conflict as the support logistics would be mind boggling, The move towards non projectile ranged weapons is the way I see things going


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,500 ✭✭✭ReacherCreature


    GreeBo wrote: »
    I think Metal Storm and its ilk will be the future of automated defense/attack

    It hasn't been produced and unitlised enough in conflict to come under qualification of 'ground-breaking' in my opinion. A weapon like the musket, semi-automatic rifle, machine gun etc. already have a history and pedigree to be inclusive in the discussion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,465 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    It hasn't been produced and unitlised enough in conflict to come under qualification of 'ground-breaking' in my opinion. A weapon like the musket, semi-automatic rifle, machine gun etc. already have a history and pedigree to be inclusive in the discussion.

    But that logic excludes any new developments then...by definition ground-breaking means that at one stage there was nothing else in the world like it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,500 ✭✭✭ReacherCreature


    GreeBo wrote: »
    But that logic excludes any new developments then...by definition ground-breaking means that at one stage there was nothing else in the world like it...

    Throughout this thread no modern firearms have been mentioned, its been: masuer, maxim, musket, repeating rifles, machine guns, M-1, cannon, napoleonic weapons. I believe the weapons should be 'tested' thoroughly i.e used in war, conflict. No point having a potential ground-breaking weapon and turns out its ineffective, not saying that's what Metal Storm is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    xflyer wrote: »
    The Maxim machine gun. It changed everything. Not least in WW1 where all sides used a variant. Warfare changed after that.

    Earlier machine guns needed manual effort. With the Maxim you pulled the trigger and it fired until the belt ran out.

    +1 Maxim
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxim_gun


Advertisement