Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DAW PC

Options
  • 01-11-2010 1:01pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 176 ✭✭


    Anyone ever bought one of those 'Music' PC systems, like Carillon, or DV's Synergy etc?
    Thinking of getting something and looking around at various options.

    I've thought about the DIY route, but I'd prefer just to be able to get something off the shelf.

    any experience, recommendations for a good, stable, quiet PC?


    (not interested in a mac, have one)


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 347 ✭✭SeanHurley


    I have a Carillion AC-1 from around when they first came out (possibly 2003-ish maybe??).

    Not a bad machine at all, still running for me at the minute although I have since switched to mac a few years ago.

    It is quiet as well.

    I would prefer a lower spec mac over a higher spec pc anyday tho, that is just my personal opinion as an owner of both pc and mac DAWs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    ive a synergy i7 and it smokes!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 176 ✭✭iquinn


    SeanHurley wrote: »
    I have a Carillion AC-1 from around when they first came out (possibly 2003-ish maybe??).

    Not a bad machine at all, still running for me at the minute although I have since switched to mac a few years ago.

    It is quiet as well.

    I would prefer a lower spec mac over a higher spec pc anyday tho, that is just my personal opinion as an owner of both pc and mac DAWs


    I need a dedicated workstation to run some windows only apps, I could try bootcamp etc on a mac, but a well set up PC is just as stable in my experience.
    As long as when I switch it on, it's quiet and the apps work, I don't really care what badge is on the case.

    I am looking at mac/windows options, but some mixed reports so far.

    any experience with windows on a mac?


  • Registered Users Posts: 347 ✭✭SeanHurley


    iquinn wrote: »
    I need a dedicated workstation to run some windows only apps, I could try bootcamp etc on a mac, but a well set up PC is just as stable in my experience.
    As long as when I switch it on, it's quiet and the apps work, I don't really care what badge is on the case.

    I am looking at mac/windows options, but some mixed reports so far.

    any experience with windows on a mac?

    I have no experience with windows on a mac I'm afraid. Might be worth checking that avenue first tho before shelling out for an audio pc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,482 ✭✭✭JG009


    You can put together a custom PC quite cheap these days. It will allow you more freedom to over clock etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 281 ✭✭Chloroplast


    I looked at all options and ended up building my own,, biggest mistake ever, especially if your buying the parts from Komplett.

    the Carillon brands seemed good to me at the time, but way to expensive and seemed too "pro" for my bedroom.

    all in all i would highly recommend just getting one off the shelf from pc world or something like that, just make sure its a high spec, then when you get it home you can tweak it, get rid of a load of unwanted programs and softs and tweak it to be more efficient, this is better than building you own because :

    when komplett sends you parts , half of the components will be corrupt, broke ,damaged on delivery, in which the trauma starts,where your taking bits out and buying new bits, and waiting endlessly for refunds and new parts, while your waiting you cant run it, so its sitting there gathering dust.

    aswell, its so easy to pick wrong components when buying the kit list, unless you know exactly what your doing, and many say its a simple to put the pc together, well yeah maybe after doing a few, but if its your first build then i suggest paying someone to build it for you.

    so you see if you buy the off the shelf pc, and something is up, just bring the whole thing back to em, and they may even just give you a new one straight away.

    another reason to buy off the shelf, is specs,

    people seem to have this notion that you need insane amounts of ram, and massive builds for good performance, this is where it all gets to be bollox, 2 gb of ram and a quad core processor is plenty.and there is certainly no need to overclock. there's producers out there still making making tunes on pentium 3`s with 512mb ram....


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,482 ✭✭✭JG009


    I looked at all options and ended up building my own,, biggest mistake ever, especially if your buying the parts from Komplett.

    the Carillon brands seemed good to me at the time, but way to expensive and seemed too "pro" for my bedroom.

    all in all i would highly recommend just getting one off the shelf from pc world or something like that, just make sure its a high spec, then when you get it home you can tweak it, get rid of a load of unwanted programs and softs and tweak it to be more efficient, this is better than building you own because :

    when komplett sends you parts , half of the components will be corrupt, broke ,damaged on delivery, in which the trauma starts,where your taking bits out and buying new bits, and waiting endlessly for refunds and new parts, while your waiting you cant run it, so its sitting there gathering dust.

    aswell, its so easy to pick wrong components when buying the kit list, unless you know exactly what your doing, and many say its a simple to put the pc together, well yeah maybe after doing a few, but if its your first build then i suggest paying someone to build it for you.

    so you see if you buy the off the shelf pc, and something is up, just bring the whole thing back to em, and they may even just give you a new one straight away.

    another reason to buy off the shelf, is specs,

    people seem to have this notion that you need insane amounts of ram, and massive builds for good performance, this is where it all gets to be bollox, 2 gb of ram and a quad core processor is plenty.and there is certainly no need to overclock. there's producers out there still making making tunes on pentium 3`s with 512mb ram....


    I suppose a first time build might be a much, I was assuming he would have as much experience as others. Yeah you might have a point about that part. I would still stand by the custom made ones though. Both for price and the freedom of expansion etc. I have saved a fortune in the past. Take for example the intel q6600, thats 2.4ghz standard, you can OC it 3.4ghz or more on certain boards.


  • Registered Users Posts: 801 ✭✭✭PMI


    Both great machines and would definately like one as a VST sample host but still do all real work ON A MAC :D:D:rolleyes::pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 176 ✭✭iquinn


    Thanks for the replies.
    A friend recommended a German place doing custom daw pc's, checking that out.
    Will either go with one of dv's synergy or the german crowd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 136 ✭✭progsound


    2 gb of ram and a quad core processor is plenty.and there is certainly no need to overclock. there's producers out there still making making tunes on pentium 3`s with 512mb ram....

    I dunno man, but my machine is barley coping with my projects with 4 gigs of ram and quadcore it really depends on what your doing im using a lot of virtual inst, drums, piano, throw in a few good few soft synths, amp sims, 100 or so tracks and all the plugins and you soon have meltdown i cant imagine what pentium 3 and 512 ram would be like.

    If i was upgrading now id be looking at 6-8 gigs ram, oc i7 quad core, good power supply and windows 7 which would be standard enough by todays standards anyway


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 801 ✭✭✭PMI


    and a 64 bit OS


  • Registered Users Posts: 478 ✭✭booooonzo


    had a carillon from way back too and wasnt overly impressed with the quietness 'for the money'.
    custom built my own Intel Q6600 from Komplett about 2 years ago and its still fairly smokin.

    IF you have the time browse the relevant boards for the software your using and copy the most popular/stable systems being used.
    Can't go too wrong that way.

    Oh ya I have an I7 MacBook Pro and while its great the 2year old Q6600 is still faster (although not a fair comparison) .


  • Registered Users Posts: 281 ✭✭Chloroplast


    progsound wrote: »
    I dunno man, but my machine is barley coping with my projects with 4 gigs of ram and quadcore it really depends on what your doing im using a lot of virtual inst, drums, piano, throw in a few good few soft synths, amp sims, 100 or so tracks and all the plugins and you soon have meltdown i cant imagine what pentium 3 and 512 ram would be like.

    If i was upgrading now id be looking at 6-8 gigs ram, oc i7 quad core, good power supply and windows 7 which would be standard enough by todays standards anyway

    yeah, your dead right actually, i wasn't thinking straight,i was thinking on a practical/budget type level, ,lol. as in, getting a decent system within a good budget,that still does the job, which would leave some cash for a soundcard/AI and some midi control.

    if one has the cash , by all means get a beast. although myself ive still to this day sucessfully managed to stay on windows xp. no win 7 with 64 bit plugs here. is there still only a handfull of developers out there that have 64bit compatibility or has the 64bit plugin thing totally standard now ?


Advertisement