Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Contra Flow on Motorways? Possible?

  • 14-10-2010 12:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,409 ✭✭✭✭


    OK so most of the motorway network is still fairly young and working fine, but I hear all this talk about if work is needed the motorway would have to be shut down and traffic diverted onto old roads. I'm just wondering whether or not there are any designated gaps or removable bollards along the median barriers to allow a carefully coned section hop across to the other lanes of the motorway and contraflow. Has there ever been a contraflow set up on the motorways before?

    This too shall pass.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,804 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    flazio wrote: »
    OK so most of the motorway network is still fairly young and working fine, but I hear all this talk about if work is needed the motorway would have to be shut down and traffic diverted onto old roads. I'm just wondering whether or not there are any designated gaps or removable bollards along the median barriers to allow a carefully coned section hop across to the other lanes of the motorway and contraflow. Has there ever been a contraflow set up on the motorways before?

    Never seen it done in Ireland yet., but the gaps in the median barriers are there for it to happen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Aidan1


    Motorway surfaces generally have to be replaced after 9-10 years, depending on traffic volumes (Most of the PPP sections have these resurfacings in the contract, including one just before the section is handed back to the State). Most of the newer motorways have been built with this in mind - they have 'gates' in the concrete barrier every couple of kilometers to allow contraflows to be out in place during re-surfacing works. The 'gates' are essentially flush fitting steel panels on the barrier - fairly visible in most cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭Roryhy


    Aidan1 wrote: »
    Motorway surfaces generally have to be replaced after 9-10 years, depending on traffic volumes (Most of the PPP sections have these resurfacings in the contract, including one just before the section is handed back to the State). Most of the newer motorways have been built with this in mind - they have 'gates' in the concrete barrier every couple of kilometers to allow contraflows to be out in place during re-surfacing works. The 'gates' are essentially flush fitting steel panels on the barrier - fairly visible in most cases.

    Its more like every 20 years isn't it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭celticbest


    There was a contraflow on the M1 a few years back when they were putting in Junction 3 (Drynam). You can still see the crossover points on google maps.

    M1contraflow.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Aidan1


    Its more like every 20 years isn't it?

    Depends on traffic - some of our Motorways will be so lightly trafficked that it will be well in excess of 20 years (M9 being a case in point), but for heavily used roads, the design life of the wear surface is 9 years. The sections of N25that were built in the mid/late 1990s are a case in point (not Motorway I know) - parts of that road are in dire need of a re-surface, and have been patched already.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    It can depend on construction quality. The surface on the M1 Dunleer Bypass is in good order for the most part, 18 years later, but the section from Dunleer to Dundalk is by no means as good, although not more more than half its age.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 parklands


    There was a contraflow on the M7 Naas bypass last year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    ardmacha wrote: »
    It can depend on construction quality. The surface on the M1 Dunleer Bypass is in good order for the most part, 18 years later, but the section from Dunleer to Dundalk is by no means as good, although not more more than half its age.
    +1

    It baffles me to see the wear surface worn away on several small stretches of the Dunleer-Dundalk section of M1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,107 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The worn bits of the M1 are covered by the mainto bit of the PPP contract so I'm surprised the NRA haven't slapped CRG in to action over it yet.

    The M4 between Leixlip and Kilcock is 17 years old now and very heavily trafficed and just has some small patching one on carriageway. It should last to 20 without any bother.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 141 ✭✭NFD100


    MYOB wrote: »
    The worn bits of the M1 are covered by the mainto bit of the PPP contract so I'm surprised the NRA haven't slapped CRG in to action over it yet.

    The M4 between Leixlip and Kilcock is 17 years old now and very heavily trafficed and just has some small patching one on carriageway. It should last to 20 without any bother.


    CRG can't even pick the litter up on the stretch they are paid to 'manage' why would they be pushed to resurface any of it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,107 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    because they're contractually obliged to. Probably having to pour all their profits in to bypass at waterford though...


Advertisement