Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

how come there have never been huge bombs that wipe out half of cities?

Options
  • 05-10-2010 1:32am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,005 ✭✭✭


    I read a post there about a supposed "848 pounds of ANFO in a ready made truck". He was only joking, but it would only take one lunatic to do it.

    One lunatic who knew how to put together a bomb and destruct a street or even more. I am not saying I wish this would happen, but how come not?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,817 ✭✭✭pebbles21


    Sure half of Cork was wiped out years ago by the looks of it:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,265 ✭✭✭SugarHigh


    Attacks on Gas Power Plants are fairly common and they do a massive amount of damage when they explode.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,145 ✭✭✭DonkeyStyle \o/


    CorkMan wrote: »
    how come not?
    it's against the law.


  • Registered Users Posts: 306 ✭✭high heels


    pebbles21 wrote: »
    Sure half of Cork was wiped out years ago by the looks of it:D
    It was in the war of Independence it is called the burning of cork. You should look it up


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    The names Hiroshima or Nagasaki ring any bells?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,583 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    CorkMan wrote: »
    how come there have never been huge bombs that wipe out half of cities?

    I hope you're not being serious...

    Because.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 610 ✭✭✭TerryTibbs!


    Corkman threads are the best


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    TheZohan wrote: »
    I hope you're not being serious...

    Because.....

    He's talking about using regular explosives.



    Tbh, I would imagine the danger of being discovered is a factor.

    That and keeping explosives around can be very dangerous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    SugarHigh wrote: »
    Attacks on Gas Power Plants are fairly common and they do a massive amount of damage when they explode.

    how common? how many have there been this year for instance?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 112 ✭✭google faps


    If i had to live in Cork, i'd imagine the urge would be overwhelming.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,137 ✭✭✭Balfie


    omagh not ring any bells? Its in the news enough to remember the devastation that was caused,


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,425 ✭✭✭FearDark


    Superman or Batman generally stop these type of things from happening...


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo



    That and keeping explosives around can be very dangerous.

    Not to mention running with them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 447 ✭✭shinobi




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,605 ✭✭✭Fizman


    Corkman threads are the best

    I read the thread title on the home page and knew it was him before I saw his name.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭evercloserunion


    Four Lions is a fantastic movie.

    I heard once that that the amount of explosives stored underneath the British Parliament as part of Guy Fawkes' plot would, if detonated, actually have destroyed not just the Parliament building but also everything within several streets of it.

    Not exactly what the OP was looking for but I thought it was interesting (if true).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,005 ✭✭✭CorkMan


    Ya man Timothy McVeigh was a right lunatic wasn't he?


  • Registered Users Posts: 444 ✭✭franklyshocked


    Hiroshima and Nagesaki would not agree with this thread.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    One lunatic who knew how to put together a bomb and destruct a street or even more.

    Not sure how young the OP is, but my immediate thought is Manchester 1996. That pretty much ruined the whole street.

    NTM


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Samba


    CorkMan wrote: »
    I read a post there about a supposed "848 pounds of ANFO in a ready made truck". He was only joking, but it would only take one lunatic to do it.

    One lunatic who knew how to put together a bomb and destruct a street or even more. I am not saying I wish this would happen, but how come not?


    :confused:

    Wonder how long it is before intelligence agencies pick up on this thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    CorkMan wrote: »
    I read a post there about a supposed "848 pounds of ANFO in a ready made truck". He was only joking, but it would only take one lunatic to do it.

    One lunatic who knew how to put together a bomb and destruct a street or even more. I am not saying I wish this would happen, but how come not?

    Cork would be first to go


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Samba wrote: »
    :confused:

    Wonder how long it is before intelligence agencies pick up on this thread.

    Probably after the bomb has gone off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭demakinz


    The docklands bombing in London was fairly big. £85 million worth of damage was done by the blast.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭mikerowsopht


    aren't there a few nukes missing around the world

    wonder where they are

    I can tell you they aren't on Ebay


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    how come there have never been huge bombs that wipe out half of cities?

    Just give it a little bit of time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Many people have gone to the trouble of sourcing the materials for such a bomb, constructed the bomb and then activated the bomb only to realise they're standing beside a really, really big bomb which causes them to lose control of their bowels and run away.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    Well most explosives aren't incredibly complicated. Anyone who really really wanted to do it..could. Buying enough material is a problem in a short period but if you've somewhere safe and dry and time on your hands..
    its basically not a phenomonal challenge from an engineering perspective..

    But why the hell would anyone WANT to destroy half a city? Its just silly.. While someone wanting to destroy a building or a symbol might be politically or religiously motivated, there ain't no benefit to mass destruction.

    --
    edit
    --
    also, making something like that is expensive


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,115 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    If i had to live in Cork, i'd imagine the urge would be overwhelming.

    spoken like a person whos wishs he was from cork :pac:.. always hate what you cant have:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭mikerowsopht


    twinytwo wrote: »
    spoken like a person whos wishs he was from cork :pac:.. always hate what you cant have:D

    I think Cork should be taken off the map via nuke


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,959 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    CorkMan wrote: »
    Ya man Timothy McVeigh was a right lunatic wasn't he?
    The bomb McVeigh used was 4,800 pounds of ANFO + nitromethane = about five times the 848 pounds mentioned by the OP, equivalent to about 2.4 kilotons of TNT. To put that in perspective: the 1917 Halifax arms ship explosion was about 3 kilotons, the Hiroshima nuclear blast was about 13 kilotons, and Nagasaki about 21 kilotons.

    So yeah, it has been done. When ANFO goes, it just goes. Unlike in the movies, you don't get to run away from an explosion.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



Advertisement