Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A list of major stocks with high upside

  • 27-09-2010 2:39am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭


    http://www.hotstockseveryday.com/2010/09/top-stocks-with-huge-potential-for-jump.html

    The List Below comprises of major stocks with current price below $3 but were priced above between $4- $10 within last 52-weeks. Most of the stocks are slammed down by the recession. Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition are few reasons for their current fate. Do your research on these stocks. With a good news these can jump back to their pre recession levels or at least to half of that level. Most of these stocks have lost almost 60-90% of their value in last 52 weeks.


    Stocks with 52 week high of $4-$8 and Current Price less than $2


    1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. FLWS
    AC Moore Arts & Crafts ACMR
    Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. ASTM
    Acura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ACUR
    Aerosonic Corporation AIM
    AgFeed Industries, Inc. FEED
    Agria Corporation (ADR) GRO
    Alanco Technologies, Inc. ALAND
    Allied Defense Group ADG
    Allied Irish Banks, plc. (ADR) AIB
    Alpha Pro Tech, Ltd. APT
    Alphatec Holdings, Inc. ATEC
    Alvarion Ltd. (USA) ALVR
    Ambassadors International, Inc. AMIED
    AMBASSADORS INTL AMIE
    American Caresource Holdings, Inc. ANCI
    American DG Energy Inc ADGE
    American Lorain Corporation ALN
    American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc. AOB
    Analysts International Corporation ANLY
    Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. AXN
    Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ARNA
    Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. ASTI
    AspenBio Pharma, Inc. APPY
    Astrotech Corp. ASTC
    Asure Software Inc ASUR
    ATA Inc.(ADR) ATAI
    Atlantic BancGroup, Inc. ATBC
    Atlantic Coast Federal Corporation ACFC
    Atlantic Southern Financial Group, Inc. ASFN
    BancTrust Financial Group, Inc. BTFG
    Bank of America Corporation SHK
    Bank of Virginia BOVA
    Banner Corporation BANR
    Barnwell Industries, Inc. BRN
    BigBand Networks, Inc. BBND
    BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. BDSI
    BioFuel Energy Corp. BIOF
    Bionovo Inc. BNVID
    Biostar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. BSPM
    Birks & Mayors Inc. BMJ
    Blue Dolphin Energy Company BDCO
    Bluegreen Corporation BXG
    Bovie Medical Corporation BVX
    Broadway Financial Corporation BYFC
    Broadwind Energy Inc. BWEN
    Builders FirstSource, Inc. BLDR
    Cadence Financial Corporation CADE
    CAMAC Energy Inc CAK
    Capital Bank Corporation CBKN
    Capitol Bancorp Ltd. CBC
    Capitol Bancorp Ltd. Capital Trust I CBC-A
    Capitol Bancorp Ltd. Trust Preferred Securities CBC-B
    Cardiac Science Corporation CSCX
    Celsion Corporation CLSN
    Central Virginia Bankshares CVBK
    Centrue Financial Corporation TRUE
    Cheniere Energy, Inc. LNG
    China Auto Logistics Inc CALI
    China BAK Battery Inc. CBAK
    China GengSheng Minerals, Inc. CHGS
    China GrenTech Corporation Limited (ADR) GRRF
    China Housing & Land Development, Inc. CHLN
    China Infrastructure Investment Corp CIIC
    China Mass Media Intl Adv Corp. (ADR) CMM
    China Nutrifruit Group Limited CNGL
    China Nutrifruit Group Ltd CNGL
    China Pharma Holdings, Inc. CPHI
    China Ritar Power Corp. CRTP
    China Technology Development Group Corp. CTDC
    Clearfield, Inc. CLFD
    CombiMatrix Corporation CBMX
    Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc. CWBS
    Community Bankers Acquisition Corporation BTC.UN
    Community Capital Corporation CPBK
    Conexant Systems, Inc. CNXT
    Conolog Corporation CNLG
    Constellation Energy Partners LLC CEP
    Copernic Inc. CNIC
    CorMedix Inc. CRMD
    Crawford & Company CRD.A
    Crawford & Company CRD.B
    Crescent Financial Corporation CRFN
    Crimson Exploration Inc. CXPO
    CryptoLogic Limited (USA) CRYP
    Cumulus Media Inc. CMLS
    CYANOTECH CORP CYAN
    Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals Inc. CYCC
    Cytokinetics, Inc. CYTK
    Dataram Corporation DRAM
    DayStar Technologies Inc. DSTI
    Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. DEAR
    Doral Financial Corp. DRL
    Dover Saddlery, Inc. DOVR
    Dyax Corp. DYAX
    Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. DYII
    EDAP TMS SA (ADR) EDAP
    Emerson Radio Corp. MSN
    Encorium Group Inc. ENCO
    ENGlobal Corporation ENG
    eOn Communications Corporation EONC
    Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. CLWT
    Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. EVK
    Evergreen Energy Inc. EEE
    First California Financial Group, Inc. FCAL
    First Community Bank Corp. of America FCFL
    First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas Inc FFBH
    First Security Group, Inc. FSGI
    Flow International Corporation FLOW
    Fonar Corporation FONR
    Food Technology Service VIFL
    FPB Bancorp, Inc. FPBI
    Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. FFEX
    FSI International, Inc. FSII
    FuelCell Energy, Inc. FCEL
    General Steel Holdings, Inc. GSI
    GigaMedia Limited GIGM
    GIGOPTIX INC GIG
    Gleacher & Company, Inc. GLCH
    Golfsmith International Holdings, Inc. GOLF
    Gramercy Capital Corp. GKK
    Gray Television, Inc. GTN
    Gray Television, Inc. GTN.A
    Grupo TMM, SAB (ADR) TMM
    Hanmi Financial Corp HAFC
    Hauppauge Digital, Inc. HAUP
    Helios & Matheson North America Inc HMNA
    Herald National Bank HNB
    Herald National Bank HNB
    Hercules Offshore, Inc. HERO
    HMG/Courtland Properties HMG
    Hoku Corporation HOKU
    ID Systems, Inc. IDSY
    ICAGEN INC ICGND
    ICOP Digital, Inc. ICOP
    Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IDIX
    IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc IMH
    IMPAC MTG HLDGS INC IMH
    Information Services Group, Inc. III
    Innodata Isogen, Inc. INOD
    Innovaro Inc. INV
    Intelli-Check - Mobilisa, Inc. IDN
    IntelliPharmaCeutics Intl Inc (USA) IPCI
    Interphase Corporation INPH
    Intervest Bancshares Corp IBCA
    inTEST Corporation INTT
    Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. JTX
    KV Pharmaceutical Company KV.A
    KV Pharmaceutical Company KV.B
    Kingsway Financial Services Inc. (USA) KFS
    Kingtone Wirelessinfo Solutions Hldg Ltd KONE
    Leading Brands, Inc. LBIX
    Lee Enterprises, Incorporated LEE
    Luna Innovations Incorporated LUNA
    Mannatech, Inc. MTEX
    Marina Biotech, Inc. MRNA
    Mattson Technology, Inc. MTSN
    MBT Financial Corp. MBTF
    MEMSIC, INC. MEMS
    MER Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. MTSL
    Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. MBR
    Merge Healthcare Inc. MRGE
    MERRILL LYNCH CAK
    Metalink Ltd. MTLK
    Microvision, Inc. MVIS
    Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MIPI
    Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. MCBF
    MoneyGram International, Inc. MGI
    MPG Office Trust, Inc. MPG
    Mueller Water Products, Inc. MWA
    National Bank of Greece (ADR) NBG
    NATIONAL COAL CORP NCOCF
    National Coal Corp. NCOC
    Nautilus, Inc. NLS
    New Concept Energy, Inc. GBR
    New York & Company, Inc. NWY
    Newcastle Investment Corp. NCT
    Nexxus Lighting, Inc. NEXS
    NIVS IntelliMedia Technology Group Inc NIV
    NIVS IntelliMedia Technology Group, Inc NIV
    NMT Medical, Inc. NMTI
    Noah Education Holdings Ltd. (ADR) NED
    Northern States Financial Corporation NSFC
    Novavax, Inc. NVAX
    Novogen Limited (ADR) NVGN
    Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Floating Rate Fund JFP
    OccuLogix, Inc. (USA) TEAR
    OceanFreight Inc. OCNF
    OCZ Technology Group Inc. OCZ
    Ohio Legacy Corp OLCB
    Old Second Bancorp Inc. OSBC
    Omega Navigation Enterprises, Inc. ONAV
    Onvia, Inc. ONVI
    Opexa Therapeutics Inc. OPXA
    Optelecom-NKF, Inc. OPTC
    Optical Cable Corporation OCCF
    Orckit Communications Ltd ORCT
    Orthovita, Inc. VITA
    Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. OXBT
    Pacific Capital Bancorp PCBC
    Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. PHHM
    ParkerVision, Inc. PRKR
    Peregrine Pharmaceuticals PPHM
    PharmAthene, Inc. PIP
    Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. FACE
    Plumas Bancorp PLBC
    Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. PARD
    Popular, Inc. BPOP
    Presstek, Inc. PRST
    PVF Capital Corporation PVFC
    Radio One, Inc. ROIA
    Radio One, Inc. ROIAK
    RadNet Inc. RDNT
    RAIT Financial Trust RAS
    Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. RPTP
    Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc FRZ
    RELM Wireless Corporation RWC
    Republic First Bancorp, Inc. FRBK
    Riverview Bancorp, Inc. RVSB
    Rodman & Renshaw Capital Group Inc. RODM
    Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. RBPAA
    Royale Energy, Inc. ROYL
    RTI Biologics Inc. RTIX
    RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation RXII
    Salem Communications Corp SALM
    Santarus, Inc. SNTS
    Schmitt Industries, Inc. SMIT
    SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SCLN
    Sealy Corporation ZZ
    Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. SHIP
    SearchMedia Holdings Limited IDI
    Servidyne, Inc. SERV
    Seven Arts Pictures PLC SAPX
    Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. SINO
    SinoHub Inc SIHI
    SmartPros Ltd. SPRO
    Socket Mobile, Inc. SCKT
    Sonde Resources Corp. SOQ
    Spherix Incorporated SPEX
    Sport Chalet, Inc. SPCHB
    SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. STRC
    SunLink Health Systems, Inc. SSY
    Superior Bancorp SUPR
    Supreme Industries, Inc. STS
    Sutor Technology Group Ltd. SUTR
    Synovus Financial Corp. SNV
    Tel Offshore Trust TELOZ
    The First Marblehead Corporation FMD
    The Phoenix Companies, Inc. PNX
    The Princeton Review, Inc REVU
    Thomas Group, Inc. TGIS
    Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co, Inc. TPI
    Tidelands Bancshares Inc. TDBK
    Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc. TBV
    Tix Corp. TIXC
    Tofutti Brands Inc. TOF
    Town Sports International Holdings, Inc. CLUB
    TranS1 Inc. TSON
    United Community Banks, Inc. UCBI
    United Microelectronics Corp (ADR) UMC
    United Western Bancorp, Inc. UWBK
    UQM Technologies, Inc. UQM
    ValueVision Media, Inc. VVTV
    Vantage Energy Services, Inc VTG.UN
    Versar Inc. VSR
    Verso Paper Corp. VRS
    Vical Incorporated VICL
    Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. VBFC
    Virco Mfg. Corporation VIRC
    Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. WBNK
    Wave Systems Corp. WAVX
    Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust WTU
    Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. RNIN
    WorldHeart Corporation (USA) WHRT
    WSB Holdings, Inc. WSB
    WSP Holdings Limited WH
    Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd. (ADR) XIN
    Yadkin Valley Financial Corp. YAVY
    YRC Worldwide Inc. YRCW
    Zale Corporation ZLC
    ZipRealty, Inc. ZIPR


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    When....OH! when are those chinese small cap stocks going to start reversing.
    RINO - BSPM - CRTP - SPU......

    Below are the top 10 Small Cap stocks with highest upside potential, UPDATED TODAY before 4:30 AM Friday, September 24, 2010 , based on the difference between current price and Wall Street analysts' average target price. One Chinese company (RINO) is on the list.

    Seabridge Gold, Inc. (USA) (AMEX:SA) has the 1st highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 159.5%. Its consensus target price is $80.50 based on the average of all estimates.

    RINO International Corporation (NASDAQ:RINO) has the 2nd highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 154.5%. Its consensus target price is $32.50 based on the average of all estimates.


    Cenveo, Inc. (NYSE:CVO) has the 3rd highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 141.9%. Its consensus target price is $12.00 based on the average of all estimates.

    Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALTH) has the 4th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 137.5%. Its consensus target price is $10.17 based on the average of all estimates.

    Skechers USA, Inc. (NYSE:SKX) has the 5th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 132.0%. Its consensus target price is $50.25 based on the average of all estimates.

    Rite Aid Corporation (NYSE:RAD) has the 6th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 126.3%. Its consensus target price is $2.15 based on the average of all estimates.


    Wabash National Corporation (NYSE:WNC) has the 7th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 120.5%. Its consensus target price is $14.75 based on the average of all estimates.

    AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAG) has the 8th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 111.5%. Its consensus target price is $39.95 based on the average of all estimates.

    Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (USA) (NASDAQ:IVAN) has the 9th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 111.0%. Its consensus target price is $3.55 based on the average of all estimates.


    Alliance One International, Inc. (NYSE:AOI) has the 10th highest upside potential in this segment of the market. Its upside is 110.0%. Its consensus target price is $8.00 based on the average of all estimates.



    http://www.cnanalyst.com/2010/09/top-10-small-cap-stocks-with-highest-upside-sa-rino-cvo-alth-skx-rad-wnc-amag-ivan-aoi-sep-24-2010.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    pirelli wrote: »
    http://www.hotstockseveryday.com/2010/09/top-stocks-with-huge-potential-for-jump.html

    The List Below comprises of major stocks with current price below $3 but were priced above between $4- $10 within last 52-weeks. Most of the stocks are slammed down by the recession. Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition are few reasons for their current fate. Do your research on these stocks. With a good news these can jump back to their pre recession levels or at least to half of that level. Most of these stocks have lost almost 60-90% of their value in last 52 weeks.

    This sounds like pure bottom feeding, picking the nastiest, riskiest socks out there using recency bias i.e. these stocks have great potential because they used to be higher. Heavy debt,Chapt 11 possibility, high competition makes these stocks very risky and low probability trades. I think you should acknowledge that before listing some imaginary upside targets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    ixus wrote: »
    This sounds like pure bottom feeding, picking the nastiest, riskiest socks out there using recency bias i.e. these stocks have great potential because they used to be higher. Heavy debt,Chapt 11 possibility, high competition makes these stocks very risky and low probability trades. I think you should acknowledge that before listing some imaginary upside targets.

    Well said. You have to love the thread title:

    "A list of major stocks with high upside" :rolleyes:

    It should read

    "A list of stocks that have failed to participate in the market rally that are over 50% down from yearly highs. Caveat Emptor"

    GLTA

    *** I apologize for being so blunt as i just now noticed that you said with good news ... In the case of ARNA
    (on your list) if they do get the good news of approval (5% chance IMO) next month then the stock is an instant 5-10 bagger. Maybe you're onto something here. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    Do not go anywhere near any Chinese stocks. Even Barron's have done a report in which they suggest that as many as 1 in 3 Chinese stocks are a scam.

    http://online.barrons.com/article/SB127448092382695075.html

    Maybe there are decent Chinese companies out there, but the risk of fraud and total loss of the investment is just too high to justify the risk of success.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    pirelli wrote: »
    When....OH! when are those chinese small cap stocks going to start reversing.
    RINO - BSPM - CRTP - SPU......

    Why would you even think of buying a China small cap stock? Just in the last few weeks a number of them have been called scams/frauds e.g. CSKI CHBT UTA FUQI
    There are no internal controls in the PRC. Be careful with these. JMHO.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    Do not go anywhere near any Chinese stocks. Even Barron's have done a report in which they suggest that as many as 1 in 3 Chinese stocks are a scam.

    http://online.barrons.com/article/SB127448092382695075.html

    Maybe there are decent Chinese companies out there, but the risk of fraud and total loss of the investment is just too high to justify the risk of success.
    drimadrian wrote: »
    Well said. You have to love the thread title:

    "A list of major stocks with high upside" :rolleyes:

    It should read

    "A list of stocks that have failed to participate in the market rally that are over 50% down from yearly highs. Caveat Emptor"

    GLTA

    *** I apologize for being so blunt as i just now noticed that you said with good news ... In the case of ARNA
    (on your list) if they do get the good news of approval (5% chance IMO) next month then the stock is an instant 5-10 bagger. Maybe you're onto something here. :)

    It's a long list and if you break it down and watch that smaller list closely you could make a profit from some of these with a relatively low risk if it is timed properly. Just time it right and perhaps some might stop out but the loss to profit will make it worthwhile.

    These obsese drugs are struggling to get through FDA, Yes some are betting their entire pipleine on one drug but look at the revelation that the cancer is confined to the particular anatomy of rats and not relvant to humans. Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. The share price is i think now at book value. It's been hammered and in deep trouble; Irregardless between now and the FDA approval date some news might likely come out forcing this up. I have seen a half dozen of these fittle away but sometimes they take off. If this succeeds then VVUS etc.. might move.
    drimadrian wrote: »
    Why would you even think of buying a China small cap stock? Just in the last few weeks a number of them have been called scams/frauds e.g. CSKI CHBT UTA FUQI
    There are no internal controls in the PRC. Be careful with these. JMHO.

    I am careful. How more careful can one be to buy RINO at $12.88/$13 and have a stop loss the next day at $14.20. That is as careful as you get why else would i mention this. As for FUQI that was red hot a couple of weeks ago. It had a terrffic run. 46% If I recall.

    Now i might have bought YUII on thursday and got hit but it's back up again already. There are risks but these chinese companies have great fundamentals. They are worth being being patient for a low risk entry, and RINO was that Stock today.
    When....OH! when are those chinese small cap stocks going to start reversing.
    RINO - BSPM - CRTP - SPU......

    Below are the top 10 Small Cap stocks with highest upside potential, UPDATED TODAY before 4:30 AM Friday, September 24, 2010 , based on the difference between current price and Wall Street analysts' average target price. One Chinese company (RINO) is on the list.


    I even highlighted RINO. RINO was primed. Am i selling you anything or trying to con anyone. NO! I am just ringing the bell before the bulls come out. You would at least expect you fellas to wait and see if i am right before going on the attack.


    I am literally just highlighting stocks that will eventually Rally. I highlighted Rino because I was eager to buy it and it had the most coiled potential. I am very interested in CRTP but unfortunately it suffers from low volume but perhaps and very likely this or next quarter as volume builds it will reward. I do not put these on my portfolio they are only day trades/ swing trades sometimes a closely guarded Buy and hold that i watch carefully. Chinese companies tend to claw back in money so you have to be observant but they are by no means to be written off as worthless.

    I think I have a clue lads and would like to give more reasoning and detail to anything i suggest but i find there is not any interest from people on this forum to waste that kind of time. You could easily pick a dozen great stocks to put on a watch list form that larger list.

    Well here are the results from RINO.

    sc-10.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    RINO looks like a pure Dollar FX play to me.If a US stock didn't move up against the Dollar movement in recent days they really are dogs. When did you purchase? At the close of the doji before the gap up, or at the Hammer close?

    14.20 looks about right stop loss wise. Will probably be triggered by any dollar reversal today though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    RINO has had three auditors and four CFOs in the past four years, while restating its financials twice. In their latest 10Q they have reported yet another "material weakness" in their financials. If you're making money trading these on technicals, then fair play. Just make sure that you keep it in the back of your mind that this company has a very real chance of being a fraud.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    I am careful. How more careful can one be to buy RINO at $12.88/$13 and have a stop loss the next day at $14.20. That is as careful as you get why else would i mention this. As for FUQI that was red hot a couple of weeks ago. It had a terrffic run. 46% If I recall.

    RINO is down from a high of $35
    FUQI is down from a high of $30

    If you are daytrading (which you never mentioned initially) then good luck to you. Clearly you know the risks and so should everyone else that is the reason i gave my opinion.
    I think I have a clue lads and would like to give more reasoning and detail to anything i suggest but i find there is not any interest from people on this forum to waste that kind of time. You could easily pick a dozen great stocks to put on a watch list form that larger list.

    Well then show us the Major/Great stocks on the list and we will watch them with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    pirelli wrote: »
    These obsese drugs are struggling to get through FDA, Yes some are betting their entire pipleine on one drug but look at the revelation that the cancer is confined to the particular anatomy of rats and not relvant to humans. Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. The share price is i think now at book value. It's been hammered and in deep trouble; Irregardless between now and the FDA approval date some news might likely come out forcing this up. I have seen a half dozen of these fittle away but sometimes they take off. If this succeeds then VVUS etc.. might move.

    Did management say that they plan on tackling the rat tumor issue prior to FDA decision? If they were to get a CRL (70% chance IMO) then i think it should bounce from here. They have a market cap of around $90m at the moment which seems low.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    drimadrian wrote: »
    RINO is down from a high of $35
    FUQI is down from a high of $30

    If you are daytrading (which you never mentioned initially) then good luck to you. Clearly you know the risks and so should everyone else that is the reason i gave my opinion.



    Well then show us the Major/Great stocks on the list and we will watch them with you.

    I am watching some of the beaten down chinese stocks like ZOOM NEP SPU caas etc... for a swing trade. Also this rally has to try hard to break the previous high of the DOW 11200 in April before we see a strong pullback. That was always my logic to confirm a bearish sentiment or bullish sentiment and of course strong second quarter earnings meant it would have to try break that previous high of april 2009.. . Alot of weak data heading into third quarter earnings might see another correction or oppourtunity to get some atttractive prices in shares once again in blue chip stocks.

    As for major and great stocks it has to be solar stocks. They are the most reliable for swing trades. I just had a hunch the chinese ADR stocks were going to start to rally. I have yet to do my homework on these but I have yet to commit to short selling. There have been ample buying oppourtunites throughout this Market since march 6th 2009 ( I was not trading as early as that ) and the january correction was the only breather for sellers since then.


    If we ever do correct hard then solar will be my first stop to start buying again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    drimadrian wrote: »
    Did management say that they plan on tackling the rat tumor issue prior to FDA decision? If they were to get a CRL (70% chance IMO) then i think it should bounce from here. They have a market cap of around $90m at the moment which seems low.

    They witheld that data from investors so they will certainly IMO have to tackle that issue head on. They will be sued if they don't. VVUS while not in as hot water as ARNA is recovering from its steep collapse in share price from where it trailed off. It's not inconcievable that ARNA might also start to recover and while it's a tight deadline they might release some news on that issue.

    It has lost any substanial upside and was $2.90 before the rollercoaster so i suppose it will need some optimitic news to get even back there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    China International Marine Container has an increased revenue of 150% - 200%
    this year for the quarters 1 to 3 2010. They have cited the world recovery for the increase in boxes and shipping. This is great news for shipping. No wonder DRYS is recovering. Check out the link.

    China International Marine Container

    http://www.google.com/finance?q=SHE:200039


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    Here are the results so far of the stocks I recommended. NEP SPU RINO FEED BSPM etc.....


    sc-11.png

    sc-12.png

    sc-13.png

    sc-14.png

    sc-15.png


    sc-16.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    pirelli wrote: »
    I am watching some of the beaten down chinese stocks like ZOOM NEP SPU caas etc... for a swing trade. Also this rally has to try hard to break the previous high of the DOW 11200 in April before we see a strong pullback. That was always my logic to confirm a bearish sentiment or bullish sentiment and of course strong second quarter earnings meant it would have to try break that previous high of april 2009.. . Alot of weak data heading into third quarter earnings might see another correction or oppourtunity to get some atttractive prices in shares once again in blue chip stocks.

    As for major and great stocks it has to be solar stocks. They are the most reliable for swing trades. I just had a hunch the chinese ADR stocks were going to start to rally. I have yet to do my homework on these but I have yet to commit to short selling. There have been ample buying oppourtunites throughout this Market since march 6th 2009 ( I was not trading as early as that ) and the january correction was the only breather for sellers since then.


    If we ever do correct hard then solar will be my first stop to start buying again.

    ZOOM has been in a long downtrend but it too might bounce of $3.60+ .... NEP SPU CAAS RINO FEED have all performed as predicted. GLTY


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    I am watching some of the beaten down chinese stocks like ZOOM NEP SPU CAAS etc... for a swing trade. Also this rally has to try hard to break the previous high of the DOW 11200 in April before we see a
    pirelli wrote: »
    ZOOM has been in a long downtrend but it too might bounce of $3.60+ .... NEP SPU CAAS RINO FEED have all performed as predicted. GLTY

    CHARTS for FEED SPU BSPM RINO CASS and NEP
    pirelli wrote: »
    Here are the results so far of the stocks I recommended. NEP SPU RINO FEED BSPM etc.....


    sc-11.png

    sc-12.png

    sc-13.png

    sc-14.png

    sc-15.png


    sc-16.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    BOVA is one of the ticker listed on my list. Here is some news. If this deal goes ahead it is an easy 30 - 45% in share value.Right now it has a tiny volume so would be too risky but hopefully when the news comes out it will surge in volume.


    Bank of Virginia shareholders last week voted in favor of a deal that could bring the struggling bank fresh capital and some new leadership.

    The $217 million Midlothian-based bank and its potential Washington, D.C.-based suitor, Cordia Bancorp, now must wait for regulatory approval for the deal that would inject Bank of Virginia with at least $6 million and up to $15 million in capital.

    According to Bank of Virginia spokesperson Michelle Hastings, the deal must receive approval from the Federal Reserve, though there is no official timeline on when approval can be expected.
    The bank in its initial announcement of the deal said regulatory approval was expected during the third quarter. Hastings couldn’t give any details on dates except to say they hope approval will come before the end of the year.

    Regulators have been slow to approve recent deals among banks. One such delay derailed a deal last year between the parents of First Capital Bank and EVB. (You can read more about how the regulatory delays ended that deal here. )

    Bank of Virginia is one of three local banks, along with Central Virginia Bank and Virginia Business Bank, under an agreement with regulators to turn around precarious financial situations. Each is now looking to raise capital.

    If the deal between Cordia and Bank of Virginia is approved, the bank will be giving up leadership and major ownership in exchange for capital. Cordia will buy up to 5 million shares of the bank’s stock for $3 per share and could own as much as 52 percent of the bank. Cordia’s CEO Jack Zoeller, would take over as chairman and CEO of the bank and Cordia executives and investors would also get six seats on the bank’s board.

    “Management and the board look forward to solidifying the partnership with Cordia Bancorp. We feel this partnership will bring not only additional financial resources, but will also bring considerable banking experience to the team,” said Bank of Virginia’s President and CEO Frank Bell in a statement.

    The deal came about after the bank lost $5.5 million through 2008 and 2009. It most recently reported a loss of $358,000 in the first quarter of 2010.

    The losses have been fueled primarily by rising levels of non-performing loans. According to reports it filed with the FDIC at the end of the first quarter of 2010, the bank had $10.1 million in loans classified as past due or in non-accrual status. Those loans were primarily from commercial and land development lending.

    The bank’s deposit base shrunk by almost $4 million in the first quarter to $189 million. Its loan portfolio also shrunk by $3 million in the first quarter to $168 million.

    Michael Schwartz covers banking for BizSense. Please send news tips to Michael@richmondbizsense.com.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    ixus wrote: »
    This sounds like pure bottom feeding, picking the nastiest, riskiest socks out there using recency bias i.e. these stocks have great potential because they used to be higher. Heavy debt,Chapt 11 possibility, high competition makes these stocks very risky and low probability trades. I think you should acknowledge that before listing some imaginary upside targets.

    Well i provided the link where i found this information and the article listed the upside. It is not uncommon for these types of articles to include an upside. It is not a recommendation that the share price will reach this price but just a means of guaging the high and lows of the share price.

    From the charts i have provided you can see that of the 5 or 6 i picked they have already returned a reward far in excess of the risk even GRRF has returned over 10%. In fact alot of the stocks listed have returned 5- 10% in the last few days. These laggard stocks generally find their feet after a signifigant rally and are relatively low risk at these prices.

    I think you IXUS you have fallen victim of the same negative attitude from awhile back. Your attitude is the type that does not factor in trading on the stock market.

    As a moderator you will just have to accept that trading means thinking outside the box and also means taking some risk. It requires technical and other knowledge and you can never dissmiss good trading ideas outright like you did or jump to assumptions.

    Most posters here know i day trade and swing trade and i did clarify that.

    5 out of 6 accurate picks validates my opinion. I only share my knowledge to give people something to focus on if they are scouring for a quick 10% or 15% gain.

    Those stocks are still going up since i posted those charts CAAS and NEP have added another few percent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    pirelli wrote: »

    I think you IXUS you have fallen victim of the same negative attitude from awhile back. Your attitude is the type that does not factor in trading on the stock market.

    As a moderator you will just have to accept that trading means thinking outside the box and also means taking some risk. It requires technical and other knowledge and you can never dissmiss good trading ideas outright like you did or jump to assumptions.

    Eh, I trade for a living (I'm not permitted to discuss my trades). I manage risk and "think outside the box" on a daily basis.

    It's rare I try and dismantle some ones trade ideas on this forum. Instead, I try and highlight the downside where I feel it necessary. Not necessarily for you but, for other posters/lurkers who may not fully understand the risks involved with trading/investing. I think it's vital for such a subject matter.

    As a trader, my focus is on not losing money (to follow the Paul Tudor Jones mantra). It's hard enough to earn it.

    EDIT: I also asked about your decision making in post No.8 to show I was actually interested in your entry/exit thoughts. See, I'm not that bad, honest ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    pirelli wrote: »
    I am watching some of the beaten down chinese stocks like ZOOM NEP SPU caas etc... for a swing trade. Also this rally has to try hard to break the previous high of the DOW 11200 in April before we see a strong pullback. That was always my logic to confirm a bearish sentiment or bullish sentiment and of course strong second quarter earnings meant it would have to try break that previous high of april 2009.. . Alot of weak data heading into third quarter earnings might see another correction or oppourtunity to get some atttractive prices in shares once again in blue chip stocks.

    As for major and great stocks it has to be solar stocks. They are the most reliable for swing trades. I just had a hunch the chinese ADR stocks were going to start to rally. I have yet to do my homework on these but I have yet to commit to short selling. There have been ample buying oppourtunites throughout this Market since march 6th 2009 ( I was not trading as early as that ) and the january correction was the only breather for sellers since then.


    If we ever do correct hard then solar will be my first stop to start buying again.

    Don't forget the Solar stocks after the correction they will be the first to bounce. That's if this is just a regular correction....:D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    The chinese stocks are roaring ahead. I can understand being cautious but I think we had a good run with these.


    sc-21.png

    sc-20.png

    sc-18.png

    sc-22.png

    sc-19.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    Do not go anywhere near any Chinese stocks. Even Barron's have done a report in which they suggest that as many as 1 in 3 Chinese stocks are a scam.

    http://online.barrons.com/article/SB127448092382695075.html


    Maybe there are decent Chinese companies out there, but the risk of fraud and total loss of the investment is just too high to justify the risk of success.


    drimadrian wrote: »
    Why would you even think of buying a China small cap stock? Just in the last few weeks a number of them have been called scams/frauds e.g. CSKI CHBT UTA FUQI
    There are no internal controls in the PRC. Be careful with these. JMHO.


    Well are you ready to admit your not at all clever, that should never give opinions about trading because you have no clue. The biggest eejits on these forums are the losers who think they have to go about telling be people to be careful the market is a fraud is IMO acceptable and posts liek that belong on the conspiracy forum and not here.

    It is not as if people can just walk into a shop and buy shares in a company!!!
    If your reading this forum and trading then your already aware of the risks and if your not then how are you able to trade because Brokers require you to read and sign risk disclosures. So it's rather fool proof and this drivel about warning people about trading is so pathetic and unprofessional.

    If you smarties can give me a 7 tickers (stocks) that you can guarantee will reward me 30 -40 % in two weeks I would be most grateful. If you can even give me a ticker (stock) that will uptrend and reward me in a moderate period of time.

    I hate to think you guys are my peers, it's embarrassing.

    Every Pick I gave has produced a solid safe and secure uptrend. Even one of these picks would have lifted your portfolio into a nice profit.

    If I recall chinese stocks in 2009 flew then we had credit tightning from china goverment and worries about china's bubble. Many chinese stocks dropped in volume. Now obviously they were oversold and the worries had subsided or were unrealised and shipping is up and technically they are ripe to run.





    sc-23.png


    sc-24.png

    sc-25.png


    sc-26.png

    sc-27.png

    sc-27.png


    sc-29.png


    sc-30.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    ixus wrote: »
    Eh, I trade for a living (I'm not permitted to discuss my trades). I manage risk and "think outside the box" on a daily basis.

    It's rare I try and dismantle some ones trade ideas on this forum. Instead, I try and highlight the downside where I feel it necessary. Not necessarily for you but, for other posters/lurkers who may not fully understand the risks involved with trading/investing. I think it's vital for such a subject matter.

    As a trader, my focus is on not losing money (to follow the Paul Tudor Jones mantra). It's hard enough to earn it.

    EDIT: I also asked about your decision making in post No.8 to show I was actually interested in your entry/exit thoughts. See, I'm not that bad, honest ;)

    Posters/lurkers..... WTF!

    There are no lurkers and there are no posters that can just trade at a whim. All brokers are required to explain the risks and even have traders sign a risk disclosure. They are required to read a lengthy explanation of all the different risks associated with stocks. If they do not understand it then they shouldn't have signed it.

    Please just accept that people that trade are adults that are all too aware of the risks of trading and are liable for their own risk taking. You can't trade ADR's without reading risk disclosures. Every 10Q has a risk disclosure. We will never be able to share and exchange idea's if this is your attitude IXUS.

    Show me one poster that encouraged trading those tickers I gave. That gave any kind of a bullish outlook. It is just as stupid to give a bearish outlook when the stocks are extremely bullish. I am sure the lurkers and posters that shorted these stocks on the above posters advice are delighted with you IXUS.

    By the way you have no right to warn people about risks that hardly even exist except in your own perception of things. That's misleading.

    Well I hope you twits are happy that no-one profited from these trades.Another job well done by you eejits :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    pirelli wrote: »
    Posters/lurkers..... WTF!

    There are no lurkers and there are no posters that can just trade at a whim. All brokers are required to explain the risks and even have traders sign a risk disclosure. They are required to read a lengthy explanation of all the different risks associated with stocks. If they do not understand it then they shouldn't have signed it.

    Please just accept that people that trade are adults that are all too aware of the risks of trading and are liable for their own risk taking. You can't trade ADR's without reading risk disclosures. Every 10Q has a risk disclosure. We will never be able to share and exchange idea's if this is your attitude IXUS.

    Show me one poster that encouraged trading those tickers I gave. That gave any kind of a bullish outlook. It is just as stupid to give a bearish outlook when the stocks are extremely bullish. I am sure the lurkers and posters that shorted these stocks on the above posters advice are delighted with you IXUS.

    By the way you have no right to warn people about risks that hardly even exist except in your own perception of things. That's misleading.

    Well I hope you twits are happy that no-one profited from these trades.Another job well done by you eejits :mad:

    Pirelli, don't take offense to this question because it is genuine but, are you Irish? It's just I think we may have a communication problem on both sides.

    For starters, no one who reads this forum should take advice on investing or trading in the markets from a post on boards.ie That is a clear disclosure.

    Now, as you mentioned above:
    By the way you have no right to warn people about risks that hardly even exist except in your own perception of things. That's misleading.

    Maybe you have a short memory but, here are some excerpts from posts by you in this thread:
    Most of the stocks are slammed down by the recession. Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition are few reasons for their current fate. Do your research on these stocks. With a good news these can jump back to their pre recession levels or at least to half of that level. Most of these stocks have lost almost 60-90% of their value in last 52 weeks.
    ......
    It's a long list and if you break it down and watch that smaller list closely you could make a profit from some of these with a relatively low risk if it is timed properly. Just time it right and perhaps some might stop out but the loss to profit will make it worthwhile.
    ......
    These obsese drugs are struggling to get through FDA, Yes some are betting their entire pipleine on one drug but look at the revelation that the cancer is confined to the particular anatomy of rats and not relvant to humans. Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. The share price is i think now at book value. It's been hammered and in deep trouble; Irregardless between now and the FDA approval date some news might likely come out forcing this up. I have seen a half dozen of these fittle away but sometimes they take off.
    .....
    There are risks but these chinese companies have great fundamentals.
    ....
    Chinese companies tend to claw back in money so you have to be observant but they are by no means to be written off as worthless.

    So, by your own words the risks are:
    1.Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition
    2.Timing it correctly (or incorrectly)
    3.some are betting their entire pipeline on one drug...Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. (therefore any bearish news would be the opposite. Right?)
    4.There are risks but these chinese companies have great fundamentals. (Not sure I can elaborate further....)
    5.Chinese companies tend to claw back in money (same as 4)

    Now, those risks that you say don't exist are actually from your own words.

    I, nor anyone else in this thread, suggested shorting any of these stocks.

    Additionally, I asked you about how you decide upon your entries and exits. You are, of course, not obliged to do so but, I am genuinely interested in how you go about selecting these stocks. I'm confused about this because you mention sound fundamentals yet, you're only looking for a quick 10-15% in a few weeks. At the same time, you talk about technical's.

    I don't want you to reveal your secret in full because anyone who can make 10-15% in two weeks picking stocks due a rally is obviously extremely talented and should keep their winning formula to themselves. But, give us a hint. What plays a big factor in your trade entries? The 50 Day MA, Fundametals, articles you read, good news,timing, intuition that a stock will eventually rally, a hunch? (note - these are all things you mention apart from the 50 day MA which is in your charts)

    Another thing, why the anger if your trades are so successful? Are you not happy to be making such a killing? Sure, it's a shame some posters may have put your ideas down but, is your P&L not doing great? It is only the internet.

    And, finally, mind your manners on this forum. We don't tolerate personal abuse here.

    To other posters who may take exception to pirelli's post, please remain civil.

    Love,
    Ixus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    pirelli wrote: »
    Well are you ready to admit your not at all clever, that should never give opinions about trading because you have no clue.
    Relax.

    Firstly, I will readily admit that I don't have an iota about short-term trading. Secondly, I have never slagged you off, not once. If you're making cash trading these stocks, then like I said; I tip my hat to you.

    However, you have to be aware that this place is filled with sheep and the stocks you're looking at are lighting up like Christmas trees with all the red flags attached to them. There are very real fraud concerns with some of the the stocks you're discussing, I definitely think the sheep here need to be aware of that before they go blowing their children's college fund or inheritance (I am not joking - there are threads on this forum to prove that) on risky stuff like this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    pirelli wrote: »
    Well are you ready to admit your not at all clever, that should never give opinions about trading because you have no clue. The biggest eejits on these forums are the losers who think they have to go about telling be people to be careful the market is a fraud is IMO acceptable and posts liek that belong on the conspiracy forum and not here.

    WTF? These stocks are all trading near their yearly lows with the overall market climbing to yearly highs. So because they all bounced since the OP i should hang my head in shame. You have serious issues. As i said before i won't touch any of these China small caps as there are no internal controls in the PRC. Has that changed recently? How many times has FUQI been delinquent on their filings? Give me a break.
    If your reading this forum and trading then your already aware of the risks and if your not then how are you able to trade because Brokers require you to read and sign risk disclosures. So it's rather fool proof and this drivel about warning people about trading is so pathetic and unprofessional.
    The only drivel i read was the nonsense in the OP i.e. major stocks with high upside.
    Every Pick I gave has produced a solid safe and secure uptrend. Even one of these picks would have lifted your portfolio into a nice profit.
    I'm very happy for you. Well done. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    ixus wrote: »
    Pirelli, don't take offense to this question because it is genuine but, are you Irish? It's just I think we may have a communication problem on both sides.

    For starters, no one who reads this forum should take advice on investing or trading in the markets from a post on boards.ie That is a clear disclosure.

    Now, as you mentioned above:

    Maybe you have a short memory but, here are some excerpts from posts by you in this thread:



    So, by your own words the risks are:
    1.Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition
    2.Timing it correctly (or incorrectly)
    3.some are betting their entire pipeline on one drug...Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. (therefore any bearish news would be the opposite. Right?)
    4.There are risks but these chinese companies have great fundamentals. (Not sure I can elaborate further....)
    5.Chinese companies tend to claw back in money (same as 4)

    Now, those risks that you say don't exist are actually from your own words.

    I, nor anyone else in this thread, suggested shorting any of these stocks.

    Additionally, I asked you about how you decide upon your entries and exits. You are, of course, not obliged to do so but, I am genuinely interested in how you go about selecting these stocks. I'm confused about this because you mention sound fundamentals yet, you're only looking for a quick 10-15% in a few weeks. At the same time, you talk about technical's.

    I don't want you to reveal your secret in full because anyone who can make 10-15% in two weeks picking stocks due a rally is obviously extremely talented and should keep their winning formula to themselves. But, give us a hint. What plays a big factor in your trade entries? The 50 Day MA, Fundametals, articles you read, good news,timing, intuition that a stock will eventually rally, a hunch? (note - these are all things you mention apart from the 50 day MA which is in your charts)

    Another thing, why the anger if your trades are so successful? Are you not happy to be making such a killing? Sure, it's a shame some posters may have put your ideas down but, is your P&L not doing great? It is only the internet.

    And, finally, mind your manners on this forum. We don't tolerate personal abuse here.

    To other posters who may take exception to pirelli's post, please remain civil.

    Love,
    Ixus


    ?

    Pirelli, don't take offense to this question because it is genuine but, are you Irish? It's just I think we may have a communication problem on both sides.


    I do take offense IXUS.

    Your either half reading my posts are your just been annoying. I clearly explained that i did not write the article and even supplied a link. So stop disseminating the article. Raskolinkov supplied a link to barron's ( that incidently doesn't work ) in relation to his comment. My links do work.

    From that article that i posted i picked two/ three tickers. CRTP ( which is now almost 100% in profit from september 27th.) RINO and i gave an example of one i was watching BOVA. You can see it clearly CRTP and RINO and the others listed in BOLD.

    Had you actually read my post IXUS i was selecting potential runners from that list. NEP SPU RINO etc.. and particuarly CRTP.


    As for timing - Most of these companies had recently expanded their production lines and the cost was absorbed into the share price and we were just on the cusp of this being reflected back into the share price after funding this expansion by share offerings. This was the ticking clock along with being oversold and growth cycles coming into play and also essentially when Amercians would plough money back into these ADR's which is always technical and partly fundamental and also plays on the naviety that people shouldn't buy chinese because they are fraudlent.


    IMO They the chinese just do business their way , so what if the ceo buys a house or loans his friends some money. That's their way and no better or worse than then shenanigans in wall street.

    I chose stocks that were expanding their production lines from the money they clawed from the stock market and re invested into their companies.

    If the ceo also buys a house for his concubine - i do not care. However CRTP and SPU are all top of their game for nows at least.

    CRTP
    SPU
    NEP
    CAAS..etc

    If you can not trade chinese stocks how on earth are you ever going to be able to trade South american, vietnam and indian and African stocks. They are the emerging economies. Maybe stay at home and trade AIB and BOI but please dont give persons reading my thread financial advice particuarly if you cannot even trade china the biggest and strongest economy in the world.

    The key to many ADR's is timing. Americans love technicals. If you don't understand the psychology than your missing an important part of what trading is.


    Also if you make a profit on a trade like this then that is your RISK. Your financially secure to risk that profit on your next play. I have some money that I have gained that I can RISK.

    As for you IXUS and what you said about taking/giving financial advice is correct and that why you should foster a thread (based on an article and not my advice) such as this into a fair and intelligent discussion. That way we are in compliance with the forum rules. Yet you come on here and start off with the crap you first posted than it makes the threads purpose redundant.

    I think you should read your first post and consider how constructive you were being in fostering a fair and unbiased discussion. The purpose of any thread is to break information down and try get some stocks into discussion and yet you delibertly tried to damage the thread with your reckless comments before even considering what i was doing. I even updated baout shipping news from china.

    Also this crap about sheep is silly. A sheep in bulls clothing who accepts to follows the bulls with a trailing 10% stop loss makes the most money. Just like those that remained bullish and followed since 2009 made all the profit. This was a sheepish market in my opinion with pigs and bears getting hurt.

    Obviously none of you guys are making any money for your clients. Then when the market does tumble your clients money will dissappear with it.


    Pirelli, don't take offense to this question because it is genuine but, are you Irish? It's just I think we may have a communication problem on both sides.

    IXUS - what difference does it make if i am irish? Are you going to infract me because your feel i am not irish. That's a narrow minded moderator at work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    pirelli wrote: »
    Pirelli, don't take offense to this question because it is genuine but, are you Irish? It's just I think we may have a communication problem on both sides.


    IXUS - what difference does it make if i am irish? Are you going to infract me because your feel i am not irish. That's a narrow minded moderator at work.

    Pirelli, let me make it clear to you. Your nationality is of absolutely no concern to me. As I said, there seems to be a communication problem between us and I think it's your use of the English language and interpretation of mine and other posters. I asked because it could explain why we are having this issue.

    You seem to think I said that you wrote the article. Where did you get that from? And this:
    So stop disseminating the article
    What do you mean by this? disseminate means to spread. I really don't understand the context you are using it in here.

    As regards fraudulent and you're discussing CEO's openly using company funds for purposes other than the company's benefit IS fraudulent. How can you even mention good fundamentals in the same post? Again, I think this may be a communication issue. Maybe you think that because China is an emerging economy ( I think it's a superpower) , that every company has good fundamentals?

    Your discussion of risk in this post again doesn't make any sense. You say you risk what you trade and only risk your winnings. Ok, but when I talk about risk I am referring to the downside potential that another investor may incur and how this could potentially occur.

    I stand by my first post as you yourself have proven it to be highly accurate in your subsequent posts.

    I asked you a question about what made you choose your entry and, as far as I'm concerned, you have just given me waffle with this:
    As for timing - Most of these companies had recently expanded their production lines and the cost was absorbed into the share price and we were just on the cusp of this being reflected back into the share price after funding this expansion by share offerings. This was the ticking clock along with being oversold and growth cycles coming into play and also essentially when Amercians would plough money back into these ADR's which is always technical and partly fundamental and also plays on the naviety that people shouldn't buy chinese because they are fraudlent.

    There is nothing quantifiable about this. Don't show me a chart with the price going up and not be able to explain your technical analysis on it.

    As regards the psychology of trading and the markets; this is something I have studied extensively and posted about here.

    Your tone, or how I perceive it in your recent posts, is completely unacceptable and I have given you a warning on that already. Really, the only reason I am engaging in discussion with you is because I think there is a communication breakdown as I have already mentioned. My patience is wearing thin with every post of yours I read and re-read. I'm actually beginning to think you are a troll because of the absolute nonsense you are posting.

    Answer these questions for me and maybe I can better understand you.

    What are the fundamentals you are talking about?
    What are the technicals you are talking about?
    What was your entry and what prompted it?

    I'll need specifics on these, further waffle will result in this thread being closed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    ixus wrote: »
    Pirelli, let me make it clear to you. Your nationality is of absolutely no concern to me. As I said, there seems to be a communication problem between us and I think it's your use of the English language and interpretation of mine and other posters. I asked because it could explain why we are having this issue.

    You seem to think I said that you wrote the article. Where did you get that from? And this: What do you mean by this? disseminate means to spread. I really don't understand the context you are using it in here.

    As regards fraudulent and you're discussing CEO's openly using company funds for purposes other than the company's benefit IS fraudulent. How can you even mention good fundamentals in the same post? Again, I think this may be a communication issue. Maybe you think that because China is an emerging economy ( I think it's a superpower) , that every company has good fundamentals?

    Your discussion of risk in this post again doesn't make any sense. You say you risk what you trade and only risk your winnings. Ok, but when I talk about risk I am referring to the downside potential that another investor may incur and how this could potentially occur.

    I stand by my first post as you yourself have proven it to be highly accurate in your subsequent posts.

    I asked you a question about what made you choose your entry and, as far as I'm concerned, you have just given me waffle with this:

    There is nothing quantifiable about this. Don't show me a chart with the price going up and not be able to explain your technical analysis on it.

    As regards the psychology of trading and the markets; this is something I have studied extensively and posted about here.

    Your tone, or how I perceive it in your recent posts, is completely unacceptable and I have given you a warning on that already. Really, the only reason I am engaging in discussion with you is because I think there is a communication breakdown as I have already mentioned. My patience is wearing thin with every post of yours I read and re-read. I'm actually beginning to think you are a troll because of the absolute nonsense you are posting.

    Answer these questions for me and maybe I can better understand you.

    What are the fundamentals you are talking about?
    What are the technicals you are talking about?
    What was your entry and what prompted it?

    I'll need specifics on these, further waffle will result in this thread being closed.

    1.
    You were publishing snippets of an article that I had no hand in making.

    To disseminate, in terms of the field of communication, means to broadcast a message to the public without direct feedback from the audience. Dissemination takes on the theory of the traditional view of communication, which involves a sender and receiver. The traditional communication view point is broken down into a sender sending information, and receiver collecting the information processing it and sending information back, like a telephone line.

    2.

    Fundamental analysis of a business involves analyzing its financial statements and health, its management and competitive advantages, and its competitors and markets. When applied to futures and forex, it focuses on the overall state of the economy, interest rates, production, earnings, and management. When analyzing a stock, futures contract, or currency using fundamental analysis there are two basic approaches one can use; bottom up analysis and top down analysis.[1] The term is used to distinguish such analysis from other types of investment analysis, such as quantitative analysis and technical analysis.

    Fundamental analysis is performed on historical and present data, but with the goal of making financial forecasts. There are several possible objectives:

    -to conduct a company stock valuation and predict its probable price evolution,
    -to make a projection on its business performance,
    -to evaluate its management and make internal business decisions,
    -to calculate its credit risk.


    3. I posted the fundamentals about CRTP, SPU COGO etc...in my last thread. If you do not read it then you shouldn't bother me with your criticism and least of all call me a troll. I would have felt your comment was trollish.. I do not consider CRTP, RINO or SPU to be nasty bottom feeding stocks. What's NASTY about them IXUS. They are reputable companies listed on major exchanges. I think you have the communication problem.

    CRTP: The fundamental for this stock are rather lengthy

    Briefly from what I recall.

    It's involved in LITH battery. Lithium is a growth story of all it's own but CRTP has also great fundmentals and has just taken a chunk out of the american market so this was one to watch.

    It has huge revenue and profit growth quarter after quarter and year after year, it is rapidly expanding it's production lines. It has an excellent balance sheet and a good share structure.

    Management are excellent.

    Negatives:

    It is a growth stock and while it has excellent credit lines it might dilute to expand. It is an ADR and so sensitive to both US markets and the chinese goverment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    pirelli wrote: »
    1.
    1.You were publishing snippets of an article that I had no hand in making.

    2.
    Fundamental analysis of a business involves...

    3. I posted the fundamentals about CRTP, SPU COGO etc...in my last thread....

    Pirelli,

    1.every quote I posted and attributed to you came directly from you not a link or something you quoted. It was your words. Now, whether you were quoting the article and not highlighting that it was a quote, I can't tell.

    2.Thank you.

    3. I don't read every post and every thread so, if I missed another thread where you highlighted the fundamentals, I missed it. I certainly didn't see them in this thread.

    I don't post to say, you are wrong and I am right. Self-validation doesn't interest me. I think we need to draw a line in the sand here for now, I've made my points and would only be repeating myself. If you want to continue on the thread, do so. If you want me to lock/delete it because it has become derailed, I will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    ixus wrote: »
    Pirelli, don't take offense to this question because it is genuine but, are you Irish? It's just I think we may have a communication problem on both sides.

    For starters, no one who reads this forum should take advice on investing or trading in the markets from a post on boards.ie That is a clear disclosure.

    Now, as you mentioned above:

    Maybe you have a short memory but, here are some excerpts from posts by you in this thread:



    So, by your own words the risks are:
    1.Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition
    2.Timing it correctly (or incorrectly)
    3.some are betting their entire pipeline on one drug...Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. (therefore any bearish news would be the opposite. Right?)
    4.There are risks but these chinese companies have great fundamentals. (Not sure I can elaborate further....)
    5.Chinese companies tend to claw back in money (same as 4)

    Now, those risks that you say don't exist are actually from your own words.

    I, nor anyone else in this thread, suggested shorting any of these stocks.

    Additionally, I asked you about how you decide upon your entries and exits. You are, of course, not obliged to do so but, I am genuinely interested in how you go about selecting these stocks. I'm confused about this because you mention sound fundamentals yet, you're only looking for a quick 10-15% in a few weeks. At the same time, you talk about technical's.

    I don't want you to reveal your secret in full because anyone who can make 10-15% in two weeks picking stocks due a rally is obviously extremely talented and should keep their winning formula to themselves. But, give us a hint. What plays a big factor in your trade entries? The 50 Day MA, Fundametals, articles you read, good news,timing, intuition that a stock will eventually rally, a hunch? (note - these are all things you mention apart from the 50 day MA which is in your charts)

    Another thing, why the anger if your trades are so successful? Are you not happy to be making such a killing? Sure, it's a shame some posters may have put your ideas down but, is your P&L not doing great? It is only the internet.

    And, finally, mind your manners on this forum. We don't tolerate personal abuse here.

    To other posters who may take exception to pirelli's post, please remain civil.

    Love,
    Ixus

    So, by your own words the risks are:
    1.Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues due to high competition ( from article )
    2.Timing it correctly (or incorrectly) ( A response to a post directed to me by another poster so relevant only to that poster)
    3.some are betting their entire pipeline on one drug...Any bullish news resolving the rat cancer issue will likely see a nice bounce. (therefore any bearish news would be the opposite. Right?) ( No! Stock is beaten down and priced in failure and was trading at book value.) Incidently it did follow VVUS as suggested and has gained 20 cents.Again this was in response to a post directed at me..)
    4.There are risks but these chinese companies have great fundamentals. (Not sure I can elaborate further....) ( I have already discussed these stocks and fundamentals in my previous thread.)
    5.Chinese companies tend to claw back in money (same as 4)
    ( I see that as an oppourtunity rather than a risk , as with crtp it had share offering and slowly ran down but the money was so well invested a savvy investor would see the potential in cooling off during a share offering- same as most stocks. )

    My P & L is good as of late although i am busy with other matters and i am unable to follow my ideas as closely as i would like. So i would have liked to see some encouragement ...which I found elsewhere.

    I have no secrets but watch stocks closely. I have merit in what i say.

    You would be crazy not to pay attention to forums and websites, they are invaluable in that they alone specialize in trading and often give news and insights you wouldn't discover in mainstream media.

    i.e
    Proposition 19 in california concerns the marijuana industry and CBIS was pipped to run on the news. It had a generous run up. there was no way i would read about that in financial times. It is very risky trading but there is no other way.

    Ixus; Do you really expect me to take your scolding seriously when you finish your post with
    love,
    IXUS.

    You are aware why I was annoyed with you calling my stocks NASTY and termed it bottom feeding. I find that rude if not cynical. We have the rules of the forum and neither you or i were being polite but i won't lower the bar so far as to telling you to mind you manners. That would be just silly. I did not start the Baiting or antagonising to get a response by being cynical, i belive that you started that and de-railed the thread.

    Anyway the potential in the stocks i picked in coming to an end for now. If you wish to accept you missed an oppourtunity ..almost 100% in two picks and up to 40% in these stocks listed on major index's and would like to me to give a heads up in future on other exciting trades then we can draw a line in the sand.


    Incidently i judge the success of my picks on what they return and not the attitude of some of the repsonses. I would hope other posters see the wisdom in that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ixus


    You would be crazy not to pay attention to forums and websites, they are invaluable in that they alone specialize in trading and often give news and insights you wouldn't discover in mainstream media.

    I 100% agree with you on this. I have sourced an enormous amount of information using forums and blogs. It's why I use boards. I know they are monitored in the trading world, well, because I monitor them daily and see others doing the same.

    Yes, I was being antagonistic with the term love. I probably crossed the line as a Mod. But, don't be so self-righteous when in the previous post you go around calling other posters idiots numerous times. You directly quoted two posters then used the term idiot after and I also took it as an indirect referral to me.

    The reason I used the term nasty and bottom feeding is because you headlined it with
    Heavy debt, possibilities Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and less revenues
    . If companies linked to such words are not so, I don't know what is.

    I can totally accept I missed an opportunity because the stocks went up. I miss more opportunities than I take.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭rugbyman


    Pirelli/All

    I have read these threads for four years on a pretty much daily basis.
    Attitudes are/have been displayed which dismay me. i like to learn,like to pick up snippets, frequently find charts and stuff a bit above me, liked the debate years ago on analysis and "market already knows everything".

    Why people want to come on and make narky comments about others comments is beyond me. I note also that some of those who made these comments have toned down somewhat, I put that down to maturing,

    these boards could provide daily info/debate. lots have gone away or been driven away.

    Pirelli I like your stuff and was glad to see you back. I would like to read more . (Am I wrong on that or did you wander off when Bullish did?)

    Regards, Rugbyman


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    pirelli, you have a history in trading companies that have been actively engaging in fraud.

    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=61785286&highlight=spng#post61785286
    Another stock to watch is SPNG (sponge tech delivery) its trading at only .14 cents and was once a high risk stock. It had 2.75 billion shares Authorised and at one stage 1.25 billion out standing with a market cap of a less than a hundred million. Promises were made to reduce the A/s but then they increased it so people were skeptical .

    However they have reduced it as of august 21st 2009 to 900 million authorized shares. They have reduced their O/S to 700 million shares. They are listed on the SHO ( naked short selling list ) which is also good because this prevents short selling of which they were a victim.


    So all in all their revenue is set to increase well over 1000% and they cannot but make a profit higher than last years so people will be happy with a few cents per share. If you research this company you will be impressed with its highly visible brand imaging and huge marketing campaign and fast selling product. Its trading at .14 cents now. It will be releasing its 10k soon. It's expected to be a very good 10k, although the marketing campaign was expensive so not sure on net income but revenue will be enormous.

    Certainly a stock to watch it is an OTC stock but company is planning on getting listed on NASDAQ.
    A few months later - http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-70.htm
    Washington, D.C., May 5, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged New York City-based Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc., an affiliate, and five people involved in a massive pump-and-dump scheme that deceived investors into believing they were buying stock in a highly successful company.

    The SEC alleges that Spongetech CEO Michael Metter and another senior executive, Steven Moskowitz, hyped fictional customers and grossly exaggerated sales figures through dozens of bogus press releases and fraudulent SEC filings to pump up demand for stock in Spongetech, a company that sells soap-filled sponges. After flooding the market with the false information to fraudulently inflate the stock price, Metter, Moskowitz, and Spongetech dumped approximately 2.5 billion shares by illegally selling them to the public through affiliated entities in unregistered transactions. They spent portions of their illicit profits in highly visible sponsorship deals with professional sports teams to further create the aura that Spongetech was a well-known and prosperous business.
    Trading on the company has been suspended and it's likely that the people involved will be going to prison.

    All I can say is that you have neck to even open a debate with me about my pick on my thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    Pirelli

    I contacted a friend of mine who is an active trader like you. He kindly gave me a list of a few websites that he uses on a daily basis that are full of traders sharing information in real-time. If you would like to speak to him personally PM me and i will give you his email.

    FireFox browser (using Tiletab add-on for split screens)
    thelion.com
    premieretrader.net
    financialchat.com

    I'm not familiar with the split screen so you might want to ask him. Anyway i wish you continued success in your future endeavors.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    drimadrian wrote: »
    Pirelli

    I contacted a friend of mine who is an active trader like you. He kindly gave me a list of a few websites that he uses on a daily basis that are full of traders sharing information in real-time. If you would like to speak to him personally PM me and i will give you his email.

    FireFox browser (using Tiletab add-on for split screens)
    thelion.com
    premieretrader.net
    financialchat.com

    I'm not familiar with the split screen so you might want to ask him. Anyway i wish you continued success in your future endeavors.

    Thanks drimadrian.
    I use some of these already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    Do not go anywhere near any Chinese stocks. Even Barron's have done a report in which they suggest that as many as 1 in 3 Chinese stocks are a scam.

    http://online.barrons.com/article/SB127448092382695075.html

    Maybe there are decent Chinese companies out there, but the risk of fraud and total loss of the investment is just too high to justify the risk of success.
    drimadrian wrote: »
    Why would you even think of buying a China small cap stock? Just in the last few weeks a number of them have been called scams/frauds e.g. CSKI CHBT UTA FUQI
    There are no internal controls in the PRC. Be careful with these. JMHO.

    Trading smaller chinese stocks is mostly done using ADRS listed on the USA exchanges. For that reason you have to be cautious to what Americans are doing. You almost have to second guess what they are doing and if wall street are off chinese stocks then i wouldn't be keen to trade them either but anything that cools of in walls street eventually gets pumped back up again and the chinese stocks were like a golden nest egg quietly waiting for attention.


    http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2010/10/14/double-down-on-these-home-run-hopefuls.aspx


    Article from motely : ( Fuqi has already had a fairly good run but here is what they are saying)

    3 stocks for a possible double down
    The following stocks are all trading way below their 12-month highs and accordingly have dirt cheap price-to-earnings ratios. Of course, there could be great reasons why the shares have been battered, but if you own them, now could be the time to check back on the fundamentals and possibly double down on your original investment.

    Fuqi International (Nasdaq: FUQI)

    •72% below its 12-month high
    •3.9 price-to-earnings ratio
    Fuqi is an online jewelry developer and seller in China and has been on a tremendous roller-coaster ride in the past few years. Investors bid the stock nearly to $30, believing in the profitability of the company and having faith in its cash-rich balance sheet. However, the stock has gotten pummeled because the company failed to file last year's 10-K and subsequent quarterly filings, and short-sellers smelled something afoul.

    Nevertheless, the company recently filed an 8-K with the SEC illustrating that its accounting firm's reports on its 2007-2008 statements didn't include any adverse opinions. The bottom line is that if you own this stock and believe management, then your thesis may be still be intact -- but now you can actually invest at a much better price.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    pirelli, you have a history in trading companies that have been actively engaging in fraud.

    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=61785286&highlight=spng#post61785286

    A few months later - http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-70.htm
    Trading on the company has been suspended and it's likely that the people involved will be going to prison.

    All I can say is that you have neck to even open a debate with me about my pick on my thread.

    Spng was a true outright fraud. It made many traders very rich who had nothing to do with it's corruption. If you lost money on this stock you should have recieved a notice to join a class action. I received one and could sue them if i choose to. I am not going to as I would have to show a worthwhile loss.

    I am sorry but this was a real white collar crime and very cleverly concealed. What i think happened was they has sold distribution rights and yet declared the sales as profit and then dumped billions of shares onto the market. Using the proceeds they continued to advertise and sponsor major baseball teams. this was an elaborate scam and they will likely go to jail.

    Your pick SOPK.OB might well be a great business but if it is in violation of SEC then it too might be another dodgy investment or even a scam. Sponge was a great business but just like SOPK.OB they issued sales that were not really sales.

    There are some brazen people that don't mind doing time once they make a millions. It would be just as hard to imagine sopk.ob would be foolish enough to do the same thing. unbeliveable huh! It was just as that reasoning that sponge tech was ligit and people were missing a huge oppourtunity and the share price did go up twice making it irrelevant if it was a scam to traders making a quick buck.

    You might make money on sopk.ob but again with these stocks it is alwasy best to take your profits as often as possible. I think that is always the most important thing to remember with penny stocks.

    Then you have short selling, undisclosed dilution etc.. Pennies are nightmare but the golden rule is usually to day trade them unless they are proven legitimate and even then have to be cautious.

    i think i was quite clear about the real risks rather than just saying that you could lose all your money. I was more concerned how to trade these stocks and not get burned rather than take a gamble on whether they are legitimate.
    I explained the never ending risks with pinks in great detail if i recall.

    Just say SOPK.OB is a fraud which is is possibly how it is seen. Then they started the usual scam of releasing News Pr every week and boasting massive sales figure and really did get attention from smaller investors. You could still trade it for a profit on high volume. Where it is now with SEC investigations and low volume i do not see the point unless you quite sure they have investors concerns at heart which is so very unlikely with so many of these penny stocks and as soon as any trouble happens they siimply are unable to care about investors.

    Another stock was ECOS and SUNV both of which have tanked. Yet if ECOS get some real contracts ( even the indian bus contract ) and some real money and start to look good i would be back in there in a heart beat.

    Also same with SUNV if they ever get their act together. Most of these companies half give a damn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    rugbyman wrote: »
    Pirelli/All

    I have read these threads for four years on a pretty much daily basis.
    Attitudes are/have been displayed which dismay me. i like to learn,like to pick up snippets, frequently find charts and stuff a bit above me, liked the debate years ago on analysis and "market already knows everything".

    Why people want to come on and make narky comments about others comments is beyond me. I note also that some of those who made these comments have toned down somewhat, I put that down to maturing,

    these boards could provide daily info/debate. lots have gone away or been driven away.

    Pirelli I like your stuff and was glad to see you back. I would like to read more . (Am I wrong on that or did you wander off when Bullish did?)

    Regards, Rugbyman

    Thanks rugbyman.

    I do miss bullish, he was great for bouncing ideas off. To be honest it wasn't just bullish as i am able to message him. I have been ' how can i put this ' painting the town red ... for long while and kind of fell of the bandwagon.

    I have been Just trading occasionally without doing half as much research but i have been doing ok and was actually trading blue chips for a while. Research is very time consuming and i have only a modest principle.

    I am going to have to reduce my watch list signifigantly and hopefully that will allow me to focus more accurately on a few hopefuls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    FYI Just got an email this morning from my trader pal.

    RINO admits to accounting fraud. Stock halted.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSGE6AI0GF20101119?feedType=RSS&feedName=governmentFilingsNews&rpc=43

    He says it will be delisted from Nasdaq now and will probably trade on the Pink Sheets for pennies.

    Always do your own DD. GLTA.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    drimadrian wrote: »
    FYI Just got an email this morning from my trader pal.

    RINO admits to accounting fraud. Stock halted.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSGE6AI0GF20101119?feedType=RSS&feedName=governmentFilingsNews&rpc=43

    He says it will be delisted from Nasdaq now and will probably trade on the Pink Sheets for pennies.

    Always do your own DD. GLTA.

    This is old news... at this point. If you only got that email this morning, :)

    My trades were swing trades. I don't buy and hold particuarly in chinese stocks with continued tightning meaures by china. Rino was just one of 6 picks i had and I said they were over when they over.


    Muddywaters first research report was on ONP which was controversial to say the least with credibility swaying between the company and the analyst. Muddywaters next report was on RINO which tanked. Obviously ONP tanked aswell since wall street was suddenly giving credibiltiy to muddywaters. But ONP recovered almost everything it lost that day.

    So if you believe muddywaters then short ONP. If not go long Rino.

    RINO apparently claimed to have customers that when contacted had no dealings with Rino..Rino exaggerated revenue etc.

    Do you want me to fly over to china and do some undercover DD before I commit to a basic swing trade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 drimadrian


    pirelli wrote: »
    This is old news... at this point. If you only got that email this morning,

    This is not old news. The company admitted to accounting fraud today. Even Barrons came out with an article i think yesterday saying the company are working on a rebuttal to the allegations.

    As i said before you have serious issues. You clearly do no DD and you jump from one stock to another trying to predict short term movements. It's just ridiculous.

    I have no interest in conversing with you anymore. You can have the last say. Good Riddance. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    drimadrian wrote: »
    This is not old news. The company admitted to accounting fraud today. Even Barrons came out with an article i think yesterday saying the company are working on a rebuttal to the allegations.

    As i said before you have serious issues. You clearly do no DD and you jump from one stock to another trying to predict short term movements. It's just ridiculous.


    I have no interest in conversing with you anymore. You can have the last say. Good Riddance. :)

    :D WTF?

    A tad bitter aren't we!

    You dredged this thread up. Try understand the internet as it is, which is a very transient source of information; while on the other side of the page insults traded do last longer.

    So a chinese company on the other side of the world is working on a rebuttal to accusations of fraud. How does that make me offensive or deserving of ridicule. I am not the chinese Ambassador.

    If I take pride in Dublin Bus and you get in a fight on a Dublin bus. I suppose you think you can call me up and trade petty insults at me. I am entitled to my opinion.

    There is no need for your attitude. Why associate in order to disassociate. Why put a smiley face after writing good riddance!

    Your behaviour is undesirable and should be kept as anonymous as your user name and handful of posts.
    This is not old news.

    It is very old news

    Muddywaters released that report a good while back and it began to sell off On Nov 9th/10th and was delisted Nov 17th. Your trader pal emailed you on the 19th of November. Either get a better trader pal or get a new attitude or both.

    Link with dates.
    http://www.google.com/finance?q=rino


Advertisement