Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Question

  • 11-09-2010 11:44am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭


    What happens when the unstoppable force collides with the immovable object?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,699 ✭✭✭samhail


    at what sort of angle? unless it is at an exact 90deg to the surface it will ricochet off, right ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭thisisadamh


    the unstoppable force is coming towards the object at exactly 90 degrees
    tumblr_l8l0929Hgn1qcwgato1_500.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭El Siglo


    What happens when the unstoppable force collides with the immovable object?

    This?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    IT would fuse the atoms of the Object and the force could proceed right on through! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,616 ✭✭✭FISMA


    What happens when the unstoppable force collides with the immovable object?

    In most cases I believe a moderator relocates the thread from Physics to Philosophy. smile.gif

    An immovable object? In all reference frames? Would be a candidate for an absolute reference frame.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,155 ✭✭✭SOL


    I would say they pass right though each other, why does everything always have to collide?

    I would say this thread moves right to the philosophy boards, and that they are free to deal with it as they see fit...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭reverenddave


    The nature of the immovable object is that it can't be moved, and the nature of the unstoppable force is that it can't be stopped.

    So if they should meet they would form a new object with the nature of both entities. The nature of the new entity will be both immovable and unstoppable.

    OR

    By definition of Equilibrium and Newton’s 3 Laws there is no requirement that a force stop or a mass move in response to a force. (A mass can hang on a rope forever and nothing moves and there is tension (force) that never stops in the rope.)
    ''Force doesn't necessarily have to be in motion ''

    But then there is the word collide :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    The unstoppable force can't be stopped so it keeps going. The immovable object can't be moved so it stays put. It's pretty straight forward really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    The action might create a new paradigm or new demension of space and time diverting the unstoppable force into another dimension :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,095 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Splat


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭Selected


    The unstoppable force stops and the immovable object moves.

    Qed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Gary L


    I might be taking this too literally but i think its an oxymoron. An irresisteble force and an immovable object cant both exist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭AhSureTisGrand


    Gary L wrote: »
    I might be taking this too literally but i think its an oxymoron. An irresisteble force and an immovable object cant both exist.

    Agreed. How can any force be called irresistible if there is also an immovable object in existence? Then the force is not irresistible


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭himnextdoor


    The immovable object would have to be the universe and the irresistable force would have to be all the energy in the universe. The force exists inside the universe and cannot leave it and object would exist around the energy and cannot contain it. The result: constant expansion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭18AD


    The force would be redirected by the immovable object?

    Much like this plane hitting a concrete wall: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q35xHzjxB0&playnext=1&list=PL5FA549C9119BA312

    The force isn't stopped.


    An immovable object and an unstoppable force cannot both exist.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement