Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tensors

  • 09-09-2010 2:38am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭


    I have a few questions on tensors.

    How do you do basic operations on them?

    My intuition tells me you could write them by their components that and treat them like a matrix and do the said operations.(Someone would need to check this.)

    Such as the Riemann tensor.

    We have a Riemann tensor Riemann(u,v,w). If we write it as a matrix then we can have the components of each individual vector and then multiply it by another tensor, also written as a matrix, Riemann(r,g,c). What I am trying to say is that can it be written as a matrix and then been operated on?

    ANY help would be appreciated.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 966 ✭✭✭equivariant


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor#Tensor_product

    This explains how tensor products work in terms of coordinates. Note that matrix multiplication is not an example of tensor product. Rather it is an example of tensor product followed by a contraction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    Hey gentillabdulla you might appreciate working through this book first:

    Schaum's Outline of Vector Analysis with an Introduction to Tensor Analysis.

    If you use the "look inside" amazon feature you'll see that the book
    applies multivariable calculus/linear algebra to things like mechanics and
    even differential geometry which would be helpful in reading things on
    General Relativity. I doubt this book is of the utmost rigour but it can't
    hurt to get a fairly intuitive introduction to tensors knowing you have the
    prerequisites. I don't know how much you've studied but this book looks
    as though it requires no more than single variable calculus and some
    linear algebra.

    If this is a problem for you, or you find learning from a schaums book
    difficult, which I'll bet is possible, you should think of getting Serge Lang's
    Calculus of Several Variables which would be more than enough to be able
    to conquer this book.

    Just a suggestion ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭Anonymo


    gentillabdulla, it is possible to expand a tensor in terms of it's components. since in gr the general assumption is that you've a manifold this means that locally you can choose a basis. when you write a tensor out in terms of it's components you are essentially writing it out in terms of a basis. That's all fine but really what you're doing there is writing a globally defined quantity in terms of local quantities. A better language to understand tensors may be in terms of multilinear maps. Then manipulation of tensors is seen to follow the rules of linear transformations on it's components. With a bit of differential geometry you'll learn about things like inner products (though really you've seen this before by contracting with the metric), exterior products and hodge products - which are all better understood without writing them in terms of local coordinates.

    i hope this helps, even though it's more of a 'what not to do' rather than a 'what to do'


Advertisement