Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Discrepancies with ARM4

  • 02-09-2010 03:47PM
    #1
    johnmf18
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4 ✭


    Hey lads im currently doing a thesis for my masters course in DIT Bolton Street on the QS perpective: 'Are we been served adequately by ARM4 in relation to M & E' and I have a query if someone can help me out with it.

    According to the new government form of contract (GCCC) we have to use a recognized method of measurement in conjunction with it, thus CESMM for Civil Works and ARM4 for Building Works. However in the GCCC provisional sums along with PC sums have been removed but are still present in the new ARM4.

    My question is how is this thus dealt with in practice, does it lead to any discrepancies and is there a need for a revision of ARM4.

    Any input would be appreciated.


Comments

  • #2
    FesterBeatty
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 406 ✭✭FesterBeatty


    ...there's a HUGE need for revision in terms of the GCCC - how about they get construction professionals involved next time they write something like that...not just accountants!!...Sorry, I could rant for hours about this and still not answer your question!:o


Advertisement