Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Question on Gravitational lensing.

  • 31-08-2010 9:46pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭


    I know that GR is a very well "proven" theory, with oodles of evidence to support it. I was just wondering however - :D - how it has been shown that the effects attributed to Gravitational Lensing is the result of Gravity, and not simply a case of the diffraction of light according to Huygen's principle and/or Snell's law?

    With regard to the gravitational lensig effect, of light bending around galaxies, could it not simply be attributable to light diffraction as
    the obstructing object provides multiple, closely-spaced openings, a complex pattern of varying intensity can result. This is due to the superposition, or interference, of different parts of a wave that traveled to the observer by different paths
    Diffraction - wiki

    Or would Snell's Law not apply, where the temperature in the near-vacuum of space would be different the closer the proximity to such things as galaxies, planets, stars, etc. and therefore the density of the near-vacuum would change.
    That is, does the density of the near-vacuum change the closer it is to planets, stars, etc. and therefore "invoke" Snell's Law?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭Gurgle


    Snells law requires a boundary between two materials, e.g air/glass air/water. This doesn't exist at the edges of a galaxy, the light travels through a vacuum all the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭ZorbaTehZ


    Snell's Law describes refraction which is a distinct phenomenon from diffraction - regardless, yes diffraction/refraction should occur around a planet, but the effects would be much too insignificant to account for what is observed (i.e. the lensing effect).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭roosh


    Gurgle wrote: »
    Snells law requires a boundary between two materials, e.g air/glass air/water. This doesn't exist at the edges of a galaxy, the light travels through a vacuum all the way.

    on Snell's law, does it not apply where the density of a substance changes e.g. light moving from cooler air through warmer air, and vice versa?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭roosh


    ZorbaTehZ wrote: »
    Snell's Law describes refraction which is a distinct phenomenon from diffraction - regardless, yes diffraction/refraction should occur around a planet, but the effects would be much too insignificant to account for what is observed (i.e. the lensing effect).

    cheers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭Gurgle


    mangaroosh wrote: »
    on Snell's law, does it not apply where the density of a substance changes e.g. light moving from cooler air through warmer air, and vice versa?
    Yes.
    You can look at this as a 'gradual' boundary or a series of gradiated boundaries. But you don't have this boundary condition between intergalactic vacuum and interplanatery vacuum within a galaxy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭roosh


    Gurgle wrote: »
    Yes.
    You can look at this as a 'gradual' boundary or a series of gradiated boundaries. But you don't have this boundary condition between intergalactic vacuum and interplanatery vacuum within a galaxy.

    with space being a near-vacuum, would the density of this near-vacuum not change with proximity to the sun, or planets no?

    also, would light leaving a star, be subject, at all, to Snell's law, as it leaves the heat of the star and moves into the colder intergalactic near-vacuum. Would there be a change of density there, that would affect it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31 jonathanmatt


    mangaroosh wrote: »
    with space being a near-vacuum, would the density of this near-vacuum not change with proximity to the sun, or planets no?

    also, would light leaving a star, be subject, at all, to Snell's law, as it leaves the heat of the star and moves into the colder intergalactic near-vacuum. Would there be a change of density there, that would affect it?

    I would say that the densities encountered in space would be negligible with respect to photons, and could be factored out

    Normally the term density is used when referring to a mass made of particles which are interacting e.g. solids, liquids.

    In space, densities would be so low that the particles are interacting (impacting, sharing vibrational energy etc) only extrememely rarely

    Jonathan

    __________________________

    http://ie.linkedin.com/in/jonathanwmatthews/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭roosh


    I would say that the densities encountered in space would be negligible with respect to photons, and could be factored out

    Normally the term density is used when referring to a mass made of particles which are interacting e.g. solids, liquids.

    In space, densities would be so low that the particles are interacting (impacting, sharing vibrational energy etc) only extrememely rarely

    Jonathan

    __________________________

    http://ie.linkedin.com/in/jonathanwmatthews/

    cheers!


Advertisement