Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Surds Question

  • 29-08-2010 03:25PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7


    Hi there. I was just looking a t a past question in the LC and don't really understand the last bit. Here's the question:

    Solve sqrt(2x + 5) - 1 = x

    So squaring gives 2x+5 = x^2 + 2x + 1

    leaves us with x^2 - 4 = 0

    solving gives x = 2 or x = -2

    I'm fine with all the above but the book tells me to sub both numbers back into the original question to check.

    so for x = 2 we have sqrt(2(2)+5) = 2 + 1
    =sqrt(9)=3
    =3=3 so thats fine.

    But for x = -2 we have sqrt(2(-2)+5)=-2+1
    => sqrt(1) = -1

    The book now says that this is not a solution as sqrt(1) does not = -1. But I thought every postive number had two square roots. So the sqrt of 1 is also -1 so what am I not getting?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    It's true that for any positive real number x, there exist two real numbers, y and -y, such that y^2 = (-y)^2 = x.
    However, by convention, the sqrt(.) function means the positive solution of the equation above.

    If you think about it, it's totally necessary to make the distinction. Otherwise Sqrt(x) and -Sqrt(x) would mean the same thing, or would be ambiguous at best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,183 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    As you say, sqrt(1) = ±1 . If you square both sides of sqrt(1) = -1, you get 1 = 1, so I don't see a problem there. It just looks weird. :p

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭CJC86


    I'd have to disagree bnt. If we are talking about the function sqrt(.), then it is important that it is single-valued.

    Otherwise, you get into all sorts of trouble when you start to generalise x^y for a real number y. Any rational number y=m/n would have n values, and we couldn't really have functions such as x^(pi) since we would not have any sensible convergence. (This is just expanding on Fremen's point tbh)

    For this reason it is important that functions are single-valued, so for sqrt(x) we choose the "principal value", which is the positive real number that when squared gives us x. It may seem a bit pointless at Leaving Cert level, but there is a very sensible reason for making the distinction between sqrt(x) and a number y such that y^2=x.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    As Freman has said the square root function denoted by the radical sign i.e.

    [latex] \displaystyle f(x) = \sqrt(x) [/latex]

    is single valued (otherwise it wouldn't be a function), and always equals the positive square root when talking about roots of positive real numbers.

    So

    [latex] \displaystyle \sqrt(1) = 1 [/latex]

    or more generally for any real number x

    [latex] \displaystyle \sqrt(x^2) = |x| [/latex]


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    Ha, you just beat me to it CJC86. And you covered all my points, but better!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 SignTheContract


    Thanks a million folks. That makes a bit more sense now. Really appreciated the help! I'll probably be back on this forum for more help during the year!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,183 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Well, I'm going to argue with that level of abstraction. I can also see what you mean if I think terms of complex maths, in a 2D phasor representation, where a resultant phasor always has a positive magnitude. A negative magnitude would be nonsensical in that context. :o

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



Advertisement