Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Slo mo tattooing

  • 26-08-2010 12:49am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭


    I just saw this and thought it was pretty cool :cool:



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,123 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    Wierdly, it looks like it's bouncing off the skin rather than piercing it... :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,808 ✭✭✭✭chin_grin


    I'm watching that going......

    "ow.....ow.....ow.....ow....ow....ow.....ow.....ow...."

    'cept it's in slow mo. But it looks amazing though! What would the average RPM (or PPM - pr!cks per minute) of a tattoo gun be? I've heard that it's 1500. But that could just be bull.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭TangyZizzle


    When I got my first tattoo I swore I could see my skin bouncing up and down.. or vibrating, I thought I was just imagining it, now I know I wasnt :cool:


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    chin_grin wrote: »

    'cept it's in slow mo. But it looks amazing though! What would the average RPM (or PPM - pr!cks per minute) of a tattoo gun be? I've heard that it's 1500. But that could just be bull.


    It depends on the setup but it could be as high as 3000-4000 pricks per minute @ 130 cycles per second--machine is only in the skin for roughly half that cycle so you get 130/2=65x60(secs)=3900.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,808 ✭✭✭✭chin_grin


    Hellrazer wrote: »
    It depends on the setup but it could be as high as 3000-4000 pricks per minute @ 130 cycles per second--machine is only in the skin for roughly half that cycle so you get 130/2=65x60(secs)=3900.

    And dya know why that's impressive? Cos there's a formula! Thanks for quenching the curiosity. Eh, ah you know what I mean.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭SV


    That's seriously cool..thanks for that!


Advertisement