Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Kursk disaster

  • 12-08-2010 12:24pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,987 ✭✭✭


    I was just browsing the BBC news site and I saw that the Kursk disaster was 10 years ago :eek:

    seeing that I remembered a video of a mother being forceably injected with a tranquilizer while berating and demanding explanations from group of Russian officials, unbelievably I cant seem to find this video online to show to my work colleague

    can anybody else remember this footage?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,595 ✭✭✭bonerm


    Strange Google didn't decide to make this their "logo of the day". They instead went for a more upbeat "Wizard of Oz" theme.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭genericguy




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    I do remember the mother going mental about it, didn't know she was injected with tranquilisers though.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Rabidlamb


    That sub was longer than the depth of the water it was in.
    Could have been lifted on end.
    Foolproof.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭PeterIanStaker


    Jasus it was 10yrs ago, I'm getting ould. Didn't the Russians refuse help?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Oddly enough, one of the sources who carried the best pictures, CNN, has "lost" the photos from its archives.

    This was the only one I could find.
    http://www.sptimesrussia.com/index.php?action_id=4&photo_id=2964

    I had no interest in the news back then, so this is all very interesting to read now :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    That sub was longer than the depth of the water it was in.
    Could have been lifted on end.
    Foolproof.

    Crumbs! would it have been that easy to lift a 500ft long 19,000 ton nuclear submarine on its end in rough seas?

    Its a pity you weren't there to take charge of the rescue efforts at the time.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,565 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f6/Kursk_wreck.jpg

    after it was raised
    Crumbs! would it have been that easy to lift a 500ft long 19,000 ton nuclear submarine on its end in rough seas?
    Its a pity you weren't there to take charge of the rescue efforts at the time.:rolleyes:

    They should really just have asked Chuck Norris


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,115 ✭✭✭Pal


    always amazed how time passes so quick

    its 9 years since 911


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭geeky


    I do remember it, yeah. I thought Putin was kinda kick-ass up until then (a president who could actually kill people with his thumb!) but was quickly brought into reality. Totally bizarre - I can't get my head around a Government that would allow so many innocent people to die out of sheer bloody pride.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20 bigswede12


    geeky wrote: »
    I do remember it, yeah. I thought Putin was kinda kick-ass up until then (a president who could actually kill people with his thumb!) but was quickly brought into reality. Totally bizarre - I can't get my head around a Government that would allow so many innocent people to die out of sheer bloody pride.

    When it comes to national security.i dont think there is a limit to what goverments will do to hide the truth unforunately!!!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭mecanoman


    Time does fly, i remember hearing how some of the crew survived
    for days in the aft quarters of the sub, they wrote letters
    to their loved ones and their Wills. Not a nice way to die.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Perhaps straying into the realms of CT, but a fascinating read here
    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/KURSK/kursk.html?q=KURSK/kursk.html


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,740 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    mecanoman wrote: »
    Time does fly, i remember hearing how some of the crew survived
    for days in the aft quarters of the sub

    Survive the blast, killed by a spark from a CO2 scrubber or something I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭The Sparrow


    Read this book about the Kursk disaster a few years ago:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Time-Die-Kursk-Disaster/dp/0553813854/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1281619610&sr=8-4

    It was an excellent read. Some of the lengths the Russian's went to try and cover it up were almost unbelievable and their refusal to ask for foreign assistance until it was too late was terrible and it really hampered the rescue operation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭kelle


    I remember it so well, the rescue couldn't take place for 10 days because there was a storm in the area and the sea was too dangerous for vessels to enter. And while the whole world held it's breath, you would think it would have been front page headlines in the papers but no - they were all about Nasty Nick of Big Brother and his shenanigans while the Kursk was relegated to page 2 and 3!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 drivealive


    It wasn't just the Russians trying to cover this up.
    The USS Memphis is what sunk the Kursk.
    Their are pictures of the USS Toledo in Bergen under repair after the incident.
    The Americans are more to blame for the loss of these sailors


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,551 ✭✭✭SeaFields


    They should really just have asked Chuck Norris

    Chuck norris put the sub there in the first place...."damn commies" he said



    Edit - post 1000 :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭General Zod


    Pal wrote: »
    always amazed how time passes so quick

    its 9 years since 911


    actually it's been 1099 years since 911.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    drivealive wrote: »
    It wasn't just the Russians trying to cover this up.
    The USS Memphis is what sunk the Kursk.
    Their are pictures of the USS Toledo in Bergen under repair after the incident.
    The Americans are more to blame for the loss of these sailors

    Wild allegations. Can you provide any kind of evidence for your USS Memphis allegation?

    Are you suggesting that the USS Toledo being repaired in a European port is unprecedented or suspicious in some way?

    Edit - forgot the obvious question: if the Memphis attacked the Kursk, why wasn't it destroyed outright with the immediate loss of all souls?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    drivealive wrote: »
    It wasn't just the Russians trying to cover this up.
    The USS Memphis is what sunk the Kursk.
    Their are pictures of the USS Toledo in Bergen under repair after the incident.
    The Americans are more to blame for the loss of these sailors

    Obligatory conspiracy theory rubbish.

    Moon landing - faked in a tv studio
    9/11 - us government job (although i do think they knew it was going to happen at some stage)
    Kursk - the yanks did it.
    Earthquakes - some people think thats the us governemt as well.

    Russia has a gigantic stockpile of warships & submarines that are basically decomposing in navy docks, waiting to be disposed of.

    Unfortunately the Kursk was still actively being used even though it was probably falling to pieces. A seriously tragic story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 drivealive


    topper75 wrote: »
    Are you suggesting that the USS Toledo being repaired in a European port is unprecedented or suspicious in some way?

    USS Toledo is nuclear powered. Norway has a strict policy not to allow ANY nuclear powered vessels military or otherwise inside its waters never mind to an underground dock for repair.
    topper75 wrote: »
    if the Memphis attacked the Kursk, why wasn't it destroyed outright with the immediate loss of all souls?

    I can only speculate as to why it was not completely destroyed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,565 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    It wasn't the US, it was the atrocious build quality of everything Russian (Soviet) back then I reckon. There are innumerable incidences of crappy Soviet build quality for every industry and machine type the built.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Poccington


    drivealive wrote: »
    USS Toledo is nuclear powered. Norway has a strict policy not to allow ANY nuclear powered vessels military or otherwise inside its waters never mind to an underground dock for repair.



    I can only speculate as to why it was not completely destroyed.

    So basically, you have no proof at all to backup your allegations?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭storm2811


    Wow,I would have been old enough to understand this when it happened but I don't remember any of it at all.

    Reading up on wiki though I found this
    Ironically, the cartridges appear to have been the final cause of death; a sailor appears to have accidentally brought a cartridge in contact with oily sea water, causing a chemical reaction and a flash fire. The official investigation into the disaster showed that some men survived the fire by plunging under the water (the fire marks on the walls indicate the water was at waist level in the lower area at this time). However the fire rapidly used up the remaining oxygen in the air, causing death by asphyxiation.

    Really awful.:(


    OP,the thing about the mother being sedated did happen,bit about it here,maybe search her name on youtube?
    On 18 August 2002 Nadezhda Tylik, mother of Kursk submariner Lt. Sergei Tylik, produced an intense emotional outburst in the middle of an in-progress news briefing about Kursk's fate. After attempts to quiet her failed, a nurse injected her with a sedative by force from the back, and she was removed from the room, incapacitated.

    Overall I'm shocked that I only know about this now,really saddening.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 119 ✭✭JackM_79


    Can't seem to find the video, but take a look at this pic

    http://g4rg4ntu4.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/kursk_woman.jpg

    The woman shouting is the mother of one of the sailors, the woman standing directly behind her is holding something which seems to resemble a syringe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,215 ✭✭✭Mrmoe


    Obligatory conspiracy theory rubbish.

    Moon landing - faked in a tv studio
    9/11 - us government job (although i do think they knew it was going to happen at some stage)
    Kursk - the yanks did it.
    Earthquakes - some people think thats the us governemt as well.

    Russia has a gigantic stockpile of warships & submarines that are basically decomposing in navy docks, waiting to be disposed of.

    Unfortunately the Kursk was still actively being used even though it was probably falling to pieces. A seriously tragic story.

    It would not be too surprising. It probably was the result of a collision rather than a direct attack. There was a documnetary on the Military History channel a month or two ago. They looked at these allegations. The Russians and US signed an armaments deal a while after that was very cosy for the Russians. There is a history of dodgy activity going on in international and sovereign waters. Just ask the Swedes.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    It wasn't the US, it was the atrocious build quality of everything Russian (Soviet) back then I reckon. There are innumerable incidences of crappy Soviet build quality for every industry and machine type the built.
    Pretty much identical to Chernobyl in that a series of screws-ups and cost-cutting initially caused the accident and then escalated it to disaster level. It wasn't an accident so much as inevitable.


Advertisement